Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/LIGerasimova

15th day of lingering complaint
If I am not mistaken, according to rules a complaint must be considered within 48 hours and should be either acceptd or rejectd. But it's been already 15th day that my complaint lingers in "candidate page" status. (!). I would appreciate any feedback and/or advice from concerned Wikipedians on how should I proceed further with my complaint: shall I appeal for arbitration or shall we try to resolve this issue here?..--Tabib 12:24, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)

"Outside view" by "user" Kiramtu Kunettabib
I ask neutral Wikipedians to treat with utmost caution the post by "user" Kiramtu Kunettabib in "outside view" subcategory where he defends LIGerasimova and repeats her earlier groundless accusations. The whole argumentation is extremely biased and is directed against me and without exaggeration is libelous, as everything was exactly the opposite. I NEVER lowered myself to User:LIGerasimova’s level (who among all other insults wrote, that “[I] suffers from pathogenic INFERIORITY COMPLEXES, obviously on account of [mine] Turkic background”-!? . I repeatedly called her to stop her personal attacks and I did it in a clearly civilized manner. Neither this "user" nor LIGerasimova herself can bring one single evidence when I attacked her personally.

I ask all neutral editors to view this user’s contribution log and you’ll see that this “user” was created today (march 2) namely for the reason of confusing Wikipedia community and perhaps waging future disruptive actions.

Moreover, I think it will be interesting for neutral Wikipedians concerned with Honesty and Truthfulness to know that within last 48 hours I have been attacked deliberately and in a well-organized manner by several vandal users operating under different nicknames. I call everyone to view Nagorno-Karabakh talkpage as well as my request for arbitration against one of the players in this unprecedented farce in Wikipedia.--Tabib 20:27, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)