Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Noloop

We've got three people
But how come were not listed at the RFC place? Abce2 | Aww nuts!  Wribbit!(Sign here)  14:20, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Never mind. Abce2 | Aww nuts!  Wribbit!(Sign here)  13:38, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

RFC...
If you've gathered all the relevant info and people involved, you may want to go ahead and move on to the WP:Arb next step in the chain. An RFC w/o the subject isn't going to move forward, as everything is voluntary. Soxwon (talk) 03:16, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * How? Could you do it? I'm not going to be on anymore. Abce2 | Aww nuts!  Wribbit!(Sign here)  15:13, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Under what category should I put? I want to get this through before I leave. Abce2 | Aww nuts!  Wribbit!(Sign here)  16:51, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Should I? Abce2 | Aww nuts!  Wribbit!(Sign here)  17:33, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not involved with the RFC, nor do I really want to be. See the WP:arb page if you want to move forward. I'll where I can, but I think you might want to reconsider leaving. Soxwon (talk) 17:35, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I have been. But which category and should I? Abce2 | Aww nuts!  Wribbit!(Sign here)  17:37, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * It looks fine as it is, you just need to get other people adding more detailed comments. Soxwon (talk) 19:16, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Outside view by Man With A 69th LIghtswitch
''moved from main page. Ncmvocalist (talk) 08:52, 16 August 2009 (UTC)''

Topic ban all editors involved (including Noloop)-- Lightswitch 23:47, 11 August 2009 (UTC) Now indefinitely banned as a sockpuppet of User:Free Hans -- Web  H amster  12:44, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

"Stalking"
Please note that this term is much more serious than wiki-"hounding". See the relevant policies. If users can clarify what they mean in the description, and elsewhere, that would be great. Cheers, Ncmvocalist (talk) 09:00, 16 August 2009 (UTC)