Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Oranjelo100

Outside view by Tom Morris
Thank you for your comments and suggestions! You're right, at times I became less calm than I should've been. That was simply due to having the same and obvious thing repeated numerous times, with zero results and no viable feedback, and unfortunately that made me somewhat emotional. That's something for me to heed, so I can also become better. &mdash; Dsimic (talk) 17:23, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Outside view by Robert McClenon
Thank you for your suggestions. At the same time, please allow me to provide further explanation, regarding whether I tried to advise Oranjelo100.

As we know, working with someone is a job for both sides – the "educator" provides suggestions and points out the rules that should be in place etc., while the "educated" side provides feedback, learns the rules, asks questions etc. The issue there is that Oranjelo100 does not want to hear anything, turning the whole "education" thing into a useless monologue and making the whole process pointless. It is like driving a car on the wrong side of the road, while completely ignoring the people waving and ponting out it is plain wrong.

So, what should I do? Just sit there and allow the articles to rot, or keep spending hours fixing the damage? That is why I asked for some third opinions, as I simply could not reach out to Oranjelo100. Please do not get me wrong, I would love to see Oranjelo100 improved, just as I wrote within the RFC. &mdash; Dsimic (talk) 02:20, 28 November 2013 (UTC)