Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/RidjalA

Regarding Desired Outcomes
I have responded to this report in full in the way Fordx12 and ajaxfiore presented it, and I think that for the sake of fairness to both sides and their respective arguments, both parties should leave this report as is, save for minor fixes. RidjalA (talk) 22:24, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Somebody requested a 3rd Opinion.
Somebody requested a 3rd Opinion. I'm your opinionator. Take this dispute back to the article's talk page with a neutral editor - me. All 3 of you have been edit-warring and tag teaming. Ex-facie, some of you seem to be Single Purpose Accounts. Don't misuse Wikipedia processes like this. RobertRosen (talk) 07:35, 10 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I have done what you requested. Thank you for being willing to help us out. I must riterate my stance here. I do wish for RidjalA to continue contributing to wikipedia and the LLDM article. Fordx12 (talk) 01:45, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Having looked at some things, I have to agree that this RfC/U is probably an overreaction. I also noted that about 40% of one editors total number of edits have been to the articles (not including talk pages) of material related to this subject. That raises very serious SPA concerns. So far as I can see, I can't say that I see that the first few steps, which include trying to find all available sources, have necessarily been tried. That would seem to be the first priority here. I too have concerns over some of conduct here, but I think those concerns extend to all the parties involved. John Carter (talk) 16:49, 12 November 2012 (UTC)