Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Wikipedia policies and guidelines/Userbox content

Page format
I'm still unsure on whether we should follow the "endorse/oppose this summary" format, or just have threaded discussions. Any suggestions? - Mtmelendez (Talk) 15:08, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Makes it hard to reply with neutral or opposing comments. Adding neutral/oppose subsections to each summary would be impractical. I'd say we could leave the separate summaries, just lose the "I endorse" subsections and allow free discussion below each summary.  Equazcion •✗/C • 15:13, 17 Jan 2008 (UTC)
 * Done. - Mtmelendez (Talk) 16:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't see what's done, but ok :)  Equazcion •✗/C • 16:15, 17 Jan 2008 (UTC)
 * K, now I do :)  Equazcion •✗/C • 16:16, 17 Jan 2008 (UTC)
 * Yep, got momentarily busy with something else in between editing. :) - Mtmelendez (Talk) 16:18, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Wikiquette alert for User:WebHamster
I've posted a wikiquette alert at WP:WQA. I've never done one of these before so I don't know what exactly happens next, but there it is.  Equazcion •✗/C • 20:33, 17 Jan 2008 (UTC)

Hm.
What exactly do people think to gain from this discussion?  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  23:57, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Some sort of fair consensus on how to handle this issue, maybe? This user feels the status quo is flawed. -- Kendrick7talk 00:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Kendrick summed it up. It doesn't hurt to have a centralized good-faithed discussion on hot topics every once in a while, does it? - Mtmelendez (Talk) 01:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Summary?
Can someone summarize the history of the issue? Not the particular MfD that got us here but the history of userbox deletions and POV in userspace.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 03:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Ooops, I guess you're doing this in the Project Space not the talk space, the link posted on MfD's talk took me here. Guess I better do some reading.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 03:17, 18 January 2008 (UTC)