Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/evolution

I'm not sure of the right format for this, nor do I think the format matters. I'm not trying to "build a case" against anybody. However, it looks like a handful of Wikipedians are trying to censor a point of view that they disagree with, and that is (or should be) against policy.

Some of them have even made personal attacks against me. Not that I mind the hurtful remarks, but if I don't defend myself others will feel hopeless in the face of similar attacks, so for their sake at least I must speak up. Uncle Ed 22:41, 28 September 2005 (UTC)


 * um, what POV is that? it seems like you're going around to every article that even contains the word evolution and arguing that it and all reference to it should be removed, including the article on evolution, and despite making the statment that you're not being 'anti-science' you seem to be showing up in articles like, oh, I don't know science and arguing that all evolution must be removed, if the article is going to continue to exist, there don't even seem to be disputes prior to you visiting these articles, not to mention, no body seems to have explained to me why this page even exists, I mean, aren't RfCs supposed to be about people? or specific users? not articles themselves?--Bah' 00:36, 7 October 2005 (UTC)