Wikipedia talk:Requests for investigation/Archives/2006/01 (2)

Pages

 * - The article has had its AfD tag removed multiple times. // James084 22:15, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * This is an issue to be taken up with the individual editor if he continues, over at WP:AIV. I'll look into whether a block is needed, but this is not an alert that needs to be listed here. // Mo0 [ talk ] 08:08, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * * - Repeated vandalism by multiple parties (including Gelfling, 68.11.247.132, and 70.176.129.48) (please see history). ShAd0w N1nJa 07:39, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * This seems to be an edit war between you and Gelfling over a POV tag. I have temporarily protected the article, please see Dispute resolution or discuss on the article's talk page.  Protection prevents edit warring while it is in place, but inevitably one version gets protected and not the other; this does not constitute an endorsement of one version over the other. -- Curps 08:05, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * As Curps said, this article was protected. // Mo0 [ talk ] 17:03, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * - repeated addition of uncited assertions by 211.30.206.11 (static address) -- Chris Q 07:45, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No recent heavy vandalism. // Mo0 [ talk ] 17:03, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * - Some idiot radio station has apparently encouraged its listeners to vandalize this page. Vandalism by multiple anons in progress. --Malthusian (talk) 10:59, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Semi-protected. Ian13ID:540053 18:47, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Penny arcade is displaying a strip in which this page is vandalized. Well, monkey see, monkey do. Melchoir 16:56, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Added as a "watch" because while this article probably won't be vandalised as much as, say, when the strip was on the front page, the strip is still recent enough that people browsing through recent archives might still get funny ideas. // Mo0 [ talk ] 00:40, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Moved to Media attention list. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 17:16, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * - mentioned on national radio. David Johnson [ T|C ] 16:48, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Now locked - thanks to whoever did that. David Johnson [ T|C ] 16:57, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * - as above, article was mentioned on national radio. David Johnson [ T|C ] 16:57, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Article was semiprotected from vandalism. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 17:16, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * reverts by AndriyK and Rydel 13 times since mid-December. Despite my numerous appeals for discussion. --Kuban kazak 10:00, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * User Kuban kazak deleted important info repeatedly. I restored it. The incident ha nothing to do with vandalism.--AndriyK 12:10, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Article protected due to reversion war, see the dispute resolution process. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 17:10, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * अमेय आर्यन DaBroodey [[Image:Flag of India.svg|20px]] 05:11, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No recent vandalism. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 17:10, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * - There's been a revert war going on here for a while, but now lots of anons (which are probable sockpuppets) are getting involved. In particular, check the history page, where the anons are leaving many vandalism-style comments in their edit summaries. Also note User:200.69.177.214, whose user contribution page indicates an interest in overt racism and WP:NPA violations, and whose user talk page indicates he/she doesn't care a whole lot about the rules. --Aaron 01:51, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Article has been semi-protected. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 16:40, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * repeatedly vandalized by anons --EvilZak 21:13, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Article was semi-protected, watchlisted by admin. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 16:29, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * has been repeatedly edited by several IP addresses with identical first three numbers (it is my opinion that a couple of students or some such are editing it) to include statements such as "F2 rocks" and "F2 still rocks". Battlemonk 20:04, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * It appears that the vandalism has ceased for the time being. Battlemonk 21:51, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * The range 142.150.0.0 - 142.150.255.255 is owned by the University of Toronto; due to the large range and potential for good edits on some IPs, a range block isn't feasible. The page has been watchlisted, please relist if the level of vandalism becomes more intense. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 16:24, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * had a small but significant inaccuracy. The painting of the Crowning of Napoleon was labelled as the "Crowning of Josephine by Napoleon". I don't see how this could be a mistake. I changed it rather than reverted it because the false edit seems to have buried under many legitimate edits. I don't know how to find who made this specific edit. It worries me because even though it's small, it seems deliberate and could be misleading: to someone who does not know about the subject, the false label is very believable. Eje211 00:54, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * high-profile page watchlisted by a large number of users and administrators, no further need for listing here. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 16:04, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * has vandalized with stupid joke (...He might have choked on a piece of his favorite Matso food...), same process in Russian wiki. --Winterheart 16:53, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No recent heavy vandalism. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 16:04, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * repeatedly vandalized by anons. --Stlemur 17:15, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No recent heavy vandalism. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 16:04, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * MosheZadka has changed the words of the quote in this page [] and deformed its meaning into what he likes. Mansari 09:43, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Wikiquote has its own administrator presence; see Wikiquote:Administrators'_noticeboard. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 10:24, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * is being repeatedly defaced by Anon IPs (probably the same person). I've reverted about 5 times today and about 10 times over the last 2 days. It might be worth locking the page for 48 hours or something. Megapixie 05:43, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Article watchlisted by vandal-fighters, vandalism level manageable. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 10:24, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * One or more anonymous editors have made several edits a day to this page over the past few days, adding repeated outrageous POV. --TreyHarris 22:56, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * 69.156.37.211 has repeatedly vandalized this page. I reverted but I'm sure they will do it again.  Probably also using 67.70.10.72 as vandalism is exactly the same. Scottanon 05:01, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Vandal is now using 64.231.244.230 to make exact same vandalism. No point in reporting them, they'll just use a new IP. Scottanon 15:51, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
 * After a several-day holiday break, it's been vandalized again, now from 64.231.246.93. --TreyHarris 02:25, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No recent heavy vandalism. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 07:44, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * seems to be the subject of competing vandalism by 62.254.173.98 and 62.254.173.97
 * The users in question have already been blocked. // Pathoschild 14:14, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * user Oahc is having revert wars with me,he keeps using a picture of a bleached hair women instead of a person with natural blonde hair.
 * Content dispute, article protected. See the dispute resolution process. // Pathoschild 06:05, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * - constantly being vandalized by an unknown troll who insists that a character named "April" that was created in a fanfic story is canon with the TV show's and book's universe. The troll's latest reincarnation seems to be IP address 64.106.85.129 . Latest reincarnations has also taken to attacking a regular contributor.
 * No recent reforms to that effect. Ian13ID:540053 17:27, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

December 2005

 * a Stanford student named Matthew Warren Vassar keeps adding his vanity bio (grafting it onto the main entry) despite numerous warnings. He has done this 32 times already, from numerous IP addresses. I think the only solution is to lock this page. --TrinityC 03:07, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Update: User:Master and Commander appears to be a sockpuppet account he has created to edit this article. --TrinityC 07:02, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I am not. All I've done is remove the inappropriate notice as two previous users have done.  Check the edit history.  I have not vandalized the article, only removed the notice. Master and Commander 07:32, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No recent heavy vandalism. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 07:44, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Someone has added two new characters to the list that are obvious frauds. They added two video game characters to the page. This article needs to be corrected and the vandal dealt with. --Donkey_314
 * No recent heavy vandalism. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 07:44, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Persistent vandal, editing from a variety of IP addresses, repeatedly adding a commercial link, often removing legitimate links to non-noncommercial resource lists in the process. -- Jmabel | Talk 04:34, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No recent heavy vandalism. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 07:44, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * has been vandalized several times over the last few days by IPs from the 201.217/16 range. -- Ze miguel 09:11, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I semiprotected the page for now. --BorgQueen 00:03, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No recent heavy vandalism. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 07:44, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Vandal has replaced image with pornography, please revert their changes. --Revolución (talk) 18:03, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * never mind. I just reverted it --Revolución (talk) 18:06, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * It has happened again (multiple times?), and on the page the image has been removed so that the vandalism doesn't show up; maybe some protection of the image is in order and the picture can be returned to the article.  Also, it may help if reverting images was a little bit more difficult for non-admins. Smmurphy(Talk) 19:35, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No recent vandalism. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 07:44, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Editor Cyde keeps removing POV tag when POV is clearly present, and Cyde also keeps restoring personal attacks in violation of wikipedia policy on my talk page. Goodandevil 16:11, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I see no personal attacks on your talk page by Cyde. I realize that while there is some subjectiveness in what people may see as a personal attack, in my opinion his remark breaks neither civility nor NPA. --Syrthiss 16:15, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * User alert concerns a user or content dispute; please see the dispute resolution process. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 07:26, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Many articles:, , , , and others under attack from a person that is using at least these accounts: User:Vesa, User:Gildyshow, User:Projects, User:66.99.2.62, User:66.99.1.4, User:4.252.203.232, and possibly others. Also has blanked user pages, removed delete tags, and more. Hard to keep up with all this and some of his edits are slipping through. Also hard to follow step-by-step warning procedure if user keeps changing identity. Request fast fast fast relief, thanks. Herostratus 03:56, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Apparently no recent heavy vandalism. // Pathoschild 09:17, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * . An editor from several different accounts keeps putting up a notice that former Baltimore Ravens quarterback Grbac died in a car crash this April. If this is true, it's never been reported on the internet, and the internet keeps track of football quite impressively. I guess I could be wrong that this is vandalism, but I don't think it is. Help, please.--Mike Selinker 03:06, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No recent heavy vandalism. // Pathoschild 09:17, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * ; someone obsessed with her has been repeatedly and inexplicably removing sourced images to replace them with unsourced copyright infringing images (see here for a partial list). He has uploaded the same images under several different names, and has switched them with the sourced images under three different user names now, all blocked by me after he has failed to respond to warnings or comment on his actions.  He has also inexplicably uploaded several copies of the same fair use magazine cover image, randomly switching them with the identical one linked to from the article.  Please block anyone on sight exhibiting the same conduct.  Other articles to watch for the same behavior (though of less interest to our obsessed fan) are Anna Nicole Smith and Jennifer Walcott.  Postdlf 21:19, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No recent heavy vandalism. // Pathoschild 09:17, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * . (High Severity) Consistent vandalism by character currently masquerading as 68.175.26.54.  Vandal also has taken form of alternate IP's and Bobbydoop Niffweed17 20:52, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Currently semi-protected, watchlisted by administrators. // Pathoschild 09:07, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * repeatedly being vandalized by User:162.58.0.60.
 * No recent heavy vandalism. // Pathoschild 09:07, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * User:Dzonatas has been trying to use the United States Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 as a usage manual for copyediting . When I exlained that the two subjects are completely unrelated he created a fictitious linguistics article and three templates.  I've nominated them for speedy deletion.  Please look out for patent nonsense from this editor. Durova 18:33, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No recent heavy vandalism. // Pathoschild 09:07, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Consistant attack over the past few days, most recent involved the replacement of all images with Star Wars inspired ones. Also edits have been made to the template of Canadian Prime Ministers (with PM being replaced by young Anakin Skywalker), I am not sure how to edit that bit.Snap Davies 11:38, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Popular page, should not be listed per new guidelines. // Pathoschild 09:07, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * (talk), being vandalised by one or several users over the past couple of weeks - deletion of content, possible spamming, and POV rants about the organisation, etc (see list on talk page). User's/users' defence is to vandalise my userpage.  Joe D (t) 22:10, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No recent heavy vandalism. // Pathoschild 08:39, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * - an anonymous IP address user has twice in the last few days replaced the text of this page with rants against Redmond for being a "champagne socialist". Angmering 17:42, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No recent heavy vandalism. // Pathoschild 08:39, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Apparent members of Web-forum that started a vanity page not accepting encyclopledic treatment of their topic. User:SExposingtheJournalisto blanked entire page (except first paragraph) and replaced with content discussion. Example
 * Content/user dispute, see dispute resolution. // Pathoschild 08:39, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * - 60.226.225.127 is Vandalising this page right now! --Activision45 19:05, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No recent heavy vandalism. // Pathoschild 08:33, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Talk Page: user:tznkai keeps blanking my comments as personal attacks when not one person was attacked and two persons (including tznkai) were actually lauded for their contributions. The discussion is relevant and in the proper location, despite the fact that tznkai prefers the comments be deleted. Goodandevil 17:54, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Content or user dispute, see dispute resolution or Administrator intervention against vandalism for comment removal. // Pathoschild 08:33, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * - repeated vandalism from several IPs, probably the same person. Many of them have already been banned. I was shocked to find that the repeated vandalism has been going on since at least early October. -- Mac Davis  &#xE0D;&#x19B;.10:25, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No recent heavy vandalism. // Pathoschild 08:33, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * - most recent vandal is IP 72.225.201.174 please stop slandering other people -
 * No recent heavy vandalism. // Pathoschild 08:33, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * - various vandals, redirects. --Kenyon 19:54, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Added to heavy media attention list.
 * - numerous vandals from GameFAQs football board Sceptre 18:08, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No recent heavy vandalism. // Pathoschild 08:21, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * - rampant vandalism that has survived (and spread) over subsequent edits. someone clean and protect? 03:20, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No recent heavy vandalism. // Pathoschild 08:21, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * (medium severity) - numerous IP vandals; probably due to the award being announced tonight; but it's a pain to even keep up. Peyna 02:12, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No recent heavy vandalism. // Pathoschild 08:21, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * (high severity) - vandalized by numberous editors, which replacing content with the info of a band (which probably don't pass WP:MUSIC SYSS Mouse 15:15, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Not vandalism, see dispute resolution process. // Pathoschild 06:42, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * is getting trash added to it repeatedly by one IP. This topic just got a link from Josh Marshall, which will probably attract even more "contributions" to it. betsythedevine 18:09, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
 * No recent heavy vandalism. // Pathoschild 06:42, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Racial slurs / Mrs. Parks truly deserves to have her story told without this BS. Would fix it if I could. Thanks. Jimaginator 21:11, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * High-profile article, should no longer be listed here per new guidelines. // Pathoschild 06:36, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Both and  are getting a lot of attention from novice editors and troublemakers as a result of recent controversies. --Dystopos 01:54, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Alert added to heavy media attention list. // Pathoschild 06:32, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Attracting vandalism (in both English and Turkish) in wake of criminal case. Would really appreciate folks putting this on their watchlists. Thanks. Perodicticus 14:23, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Alert added to heavy media attention list. // Pathoschild 06:32, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * ,, and have been under a constant external-link edit war by anonymous users for the past couple weeks. --Quarl 07:07, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No recent heavy vandalism. // Pathoschild 06:22, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * being persistently vandalised, please can regulars keep an eye on this, ta quercus robur 01:25, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No recent heavy vandalism. // Pathoschild 06:22, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * low severity. Many people are adding adverts for a Counter Strike clan.  Bart133 21:13, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No recent heavy vandalism. // Pathoschild 06:22, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Repeated vandalism--profanity/obscenity. Please protect. EdwinHJ | Talk 19:38, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No recent heavy vandalism. // Pathoschild 06:22, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Repeated vandalism by 69.79.38.181. Fightindaman 02:44, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * ** No recent heavy vandalism. // Pathoschild 06:22, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Repeated vandalism by 222.165.170.72. U238 19:55, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No recent heavy vandalism. // Pathoschild 06:22, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * repeated POV/reverting by anonymous users. --Quarl 09:36, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Vandalism rate back to normal level. // Pathoschild 08:30, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * (ironic) and pages.  Someone is inserting images into ref tags? Cybergoth 17:55, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Vandalism designated long-term alert due to constant vandalism, no recent vandalism to Dominion of Canada. // Pathoschild 08:04, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Pandit Bhajan Sopori Repeated removal of the copyvio tag without explanation by multiple addresses in the 221.134.* range Hirudo 21:54, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * The page was successfully deleted. // Pathoschild 07:44, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Daria - Target of blanking vandalism, so far by and . I have handed these two users 24-hour blocks. - Mike Rosoft 18:41, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No recent vandalism. // Pathoschild 07:42, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * has vandalised user pages more then 10 times he has vandalised ituh user page today and should be blocked.
 * Please see Administrator intervention against vandalism for cases of clear vandalism. // Pathoschild 07:35, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Neurotically Yours It looks like a team of vandals has been attacking this page for weeks now, and is being vandalized right now. --Kevin L&#39;Huillier 22:08, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No recent vandalism. // Pathoschild 06:43, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Louis Braille is the top link given from Google's holiday logo. As a result it is seeing huge traffic and vandalism.  Instead of protecting it we are defending it, but will probably need more help.  Please pitch in as you can.  Wikibofh(talk) 18:07, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Google has since changed their logo. // Pathoschild 06:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * KaDee_Strickland - currently repeatedly being vandalised by different IPs, likely one and the same person. -- Solitude\talk 17:52, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * This article is today's featured article and thus linked from the main page. As per Protection policy, please do not protect it since all daily featured articles generally become targets of vandalism. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 19:30, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Featured articles should no longer be added to this list per the new guidelines. // Pathoschild 06:31, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Several vandalism attempts on [[Omnipotence paradox|Today's Featured Article}}.
 * Featured articles should no longer be added to this list per the new guidelines. // Pathoschild 06:31, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 208.183.225.11(talk) keeps adding pointless edits to Characters on Drawn Together. According to their user page, this person's contributions seem to consist of vandalism exclusively.
 * Please report vandalism by a single user at Administrator intervention against vandalism. // Pathoschild 06:27, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Brown hair User:69.117.27.68 keep changing a image to a Kristin Kreuk Photo which doesn't show any visable brown hair
 * Content dispute, page protected and users referred to the dispute resolution process. // Pathoschild 06:08, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

IP Addresses

 * -- personal attacks on Agent0042 and constant vandalism on Arthur (TV series) page with the "April" fanfic entry. Believed to be a sockpuppet of a few past warned users who also tried to put "April" into the guide.
 * No recent major vandalism. // Mo0 [ talk ] 17:13, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * -- Persistently removing valid links from SHOUTcast, and adding links to his own commercial website. --AndrewMrse 21:27, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * SHOUTcast vandalism appears to have stopped. Mo0 [ talk ] 17:10, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * repeatedly vandalizing Mikhail Gorbachev. Has been warned already. Also he is an ex-vandalist--Ugur Basak 12:11, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Blocked 1 month. Ian13ID:540053 18:52, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * - same IP address vandalising multiple pages. multiple dates. static IP.
 * Blocked for 24 hours. Ian13ID:540053 18:45, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * vandalized Clarence Darrow (put vandalism back after it was reverted), and then went on a bit of a spree hitting Adolph Hitler and Osama bin Laden as well.
 * Blocked for 24 hours. --Wgfinley 15:20, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * repeat reverting to push his/her theory on a number of pages involving south India. Pl see edit history and discussions. - Cribananda 04:50, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Blocked for 24 hours. Ian13ID:540053 17:53, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Has been vandalising Ante Pavelić, once or twice a day since the begining of the month. --BadSeed 05:43, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Blocked for 31 hours. Ian13ID:540053 17:53, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Slew of vandalism, no useful contributions, prior 1 week block.
 * blocked for one month. --Wgfinley 21:41, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Has vandalised multiple articles two days in this month. Some isolated vandalism registered in 2005 by this IP. Not a single useful contribution. --John C PI 22:29, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No recent vandalism. Ian13ID:540053 17:46, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * -- Vandalising, despite warnings.--Ugur Basak 01:17, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Was obviously using some kind of bot and has a history, blocked for 1 week. --Wgfinley 01:28, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Thought there was a prior block on IP, wasn't, changed block to 48 hrs. --Wgfinley 01:38, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * - Persists in vandalism although warned several times. PatGallacher 15:21, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * -- vandalising Svinesund Bridge with partial blanking, more than once. Vandalised Brandenburg concertos with nonsense. Has been warned twice (not all the way to final warning yet) but could stand watching. ++Lar: t/c 18:37, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * -- Keeps putting a wrong date in PBS idents. Georgia guy 00:55, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
 * User blocked one week. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 08:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
 * -- linkspamming for an Indian music site. Has hit dozens of Indian cinema related articles. PLEASE rollback all these edits. It would take me too long to do it one by one. Zora 09:16, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
 * User stopped after last warning, should have been reported at WP:AIV otherwise. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 08:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
 * -- repeat vandalism of Rogers Park, Chicago since october, has intensified yesterday and today; user removes sections of article and replaces with 'too many niggers' and similar garbage.  Apparently static IP. -- MattHucke(t) 19:11, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
 * User was blocked one month. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 08:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
 * -- 3 edits, 3 vandalisms - St Edmunds Hall is "one of the shi**est colleges of the university of oxford etc. etc. Tomber
 * No warnings, no history of vandalism, and no evidence of being an open, static, or unshared. Please follow the page guidelines before and when reporting. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 08:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
 * User talk:Lucky 6.9 This vandal deleted my article 5 seconds after I posted it Irish Kennel Club. I left a message on her talk page and notice others were complaining about the same issue.  Please discuss and discipline this person, so they stop deleting pages without even any discussion.  Thank you SirIsaacBrock 03:34, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No apparent violation of policy, although the administrator should have provided a reason for the deletion. The scope of this page does not extend beyond this; please see the dispute resolution process]. // [[User:Pathoschild/s|Pathoschild (admin / talk) 07:48, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
 * - seems to have a history of slight changes that is vandalism.  Steve-O 01:44, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Moved alert from "pages" to "IP addresses". // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 16:13, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * All recent edits appear to be in good faith; no need for administrator intervention. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 07:48, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I have reversed the vandalism of a few times today in  and other places. I just wanted people to know about this problem. I have left two warnings. Kukini 17:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Moved alert from "pages" to "IP addresses". // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 16:13, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No recent edits, no need for administrator intervention. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 07:48, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
 * has been vandalized 6 times in the last two days by . This user was previously blocked for vandalism last week. — J3ff 02:27, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Moved alert from "pages" to "IP addresses". // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 16:13, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * User already dealt with. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 07:48, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
 * . Warned about zillion times, blocked couple of times, nothing helps. Right now raging on Vietnam War. Pavel Vozenilek 22:03, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * User was blocked two minutes before the alert. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 07:48, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
 * See next entry.
 * Vandalism already dealt with, should have been reported at Administrator intervention against vandalism. // Pathoschild 06:52, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Series of purile changes in various articles--it looks like two teenagers in one computer lab in Oregon. They've both been warned. Justin Eiler 18:30, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Vandalism already dealt with, should have been reported at Administrator intervention against vandalism. // Pathoschild 06:52, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * -- Vandalizes with generally comedic or puerile changes to articles. I'm new here and I wasn't quite sure how to do what Syrthiss said in a previous note for an IP Address.  If you can point me to a page that tells me how, I'll gladly do it myself!--Silverhand 17:58, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Has 1 warning so far, lets see how it develops. They stopped vandalizing after that warning. I'm replying on your talk page with more info. --Syrthiss 18:04, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No further vandalism, should have been reported at Administrator intervention against vandalism. // Pathoschild 06:52, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * -- A history of vandalising pages with nonsense. // Christy747 15:44, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * warned vandal with test4 and placed a repeat vandal notice on their page, but they have stopped for now. Please make sure that you warn vandals with the proper test templates when you catch them vandalizing.  Thanks! --Syrthiss 16:10, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Shared IP address, see Administrator intervention against vandalism. // Pathoschild 17:52, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Repeated vandalism of Altair BASIC Has been given many warnings and a last warning this month NeOak 17:14, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * -- Vandalism; Has consistently posted this groups supposed secrets after several warnings; has been on this block log list before but still continues to do this. // Lk281 22:07, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Content dispute with previously unwarned and unblocked user. Issued 3RR warning. Ian13ID:540053 17:34, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Registered users

 * All P**fed Up - Asterisks are missing in actual name, which violates the no offensive user names policy. He has been asked to change it but has not yet responded. Contributions seem to be OK, They're albeit rather trivial ones that relate to Tintin books but they're not vandalism. Arno 05:34, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I'd love to have a chat with this user about his username, but you didn't tell us what's behind the asterisks, so I can't go to his userpage. Mo0 [ talk ] 05:23, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * It's the letter 'o' that the asterisks replaced. However, he has not entered anything in his/her user page; the talk page is where you need to go. He/she is still using this user ID. Arno 02:42, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Is "poof" a slang term that I'm not aware of? I don't see anything wrong with this username. Mo0 [ talk ] 03:32, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * It's a swear word, for goodness sakes!! A derogatory word for homosexual, to be precise.Arno 03:38, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Really? Being gay myself, you'd figure I would've known about that one already. I think it's meant more in the sense of a pillow being poofed up to look more... poofy.  I don't think this is really a username that presents a problem, and the user is not vandalising at all, so I'm moving this to the archives. Mo0 [ talk ] 08:06, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * -- User has warned many times but still blanking pages--Ugur Basak 02:40, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Blocked 31 hours. Ian13ID:540053 18:59, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * -- Blanking France. --Pixeltoo 15:33, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Blocked 24 hours. Ian13ID:540053 18:55, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * User:Roger Danger Field Account created today appears to be someone's sockpuppet, probably a blocked or banned user. Is vandalizing pages and leaving profane responses to RfC requests. Durova 17:58, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I haven't vandalised anything. Wikipedia does not have a swear filter, and it has been widely said that the censoring of content deemed bad by some ages is not part of the agenda. That said, I can swear if I feel like it, as long as I'm making my point. If you don't like it, then I'm sorry, I'll try not to swear as much, but calling it vandalism when I'm clearly making valid points is incorrect. I also am not a clone, if that's what I assume you mean by "sockpuppet". Thank you. Roger Danger Field 18:32, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Refer to this user's edits at Jordan. User:Roger Danger Field vandalized it three times today, including once after I left a note on his/her userpage and filed this notice.  This user violated WP:3RR in order to claim that the country of Jordan exists as an excuse for Michael Jordan.  With one of those edits (the second ever on this username), this editor requests discussion on the talk page.  A genuinely new user wouldn't know Wikipedia that well. Durova 21:17, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * You are incorrect sir. I reverted twice, not 3 times. The first edit was adding a quote, which got some coverage when it was said. It was also a prominent quote on Jordan, which did have some coverage at the time it was made. So I'd like to make clear this is not vandalism, but a content dispute. Clearly, some of you have not read the "biting the newcomer" thing, which may I add is a cracking read. You have not once asked me or gave a reason why the line needed to be removed, and I think there is a certain amount of bad faith in that. Some of the honourable gentlemen here need to realize that some of us are learners, and that if content shouldn't be where it is, you should help not continually go on a defaming exercise. Content Disputes are not vandalism. Roger Danger Field 09:10, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No action taken. The content the user added to the page in question was valid trivia; whether it belongs in the article or not is a matter for discussion. There was no violation of the three-revert rule, and the user responded to warnings with reasonable civility. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 18:25, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * -- This user is on a mission to evangelize Wikipedia . She has repeatedly inserted "It's the one true religion." into Christianity, using multiple sock puppets:
 * All indef blocked. Ian13ID:540053 18:21, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * -- vandalasing pages, replacing with his thoughts etc. Also vandalised my user pages. He has warned 2 times--Ugur Basak 01:23, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Indef blocked as vandalism only account. Ian13ID:540053 18:12, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * has vandalised my Userpage. and i have good reason to believe he is a socketpuppet of User:Cooliomccool
 * Moved alert from "Pages" to "Registered users". // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 17:21, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Indef blocked as vandalism only account. Ian13ID:540053 18:12, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Jebubby placing offensive images on random pages. RealityDistortionField 07:02, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Indef blocked as vandalism only account. Ian13ID:540053 18:12, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Abuse of tags. Bad-faith placing of tags on articles that do not meet such criteria. Vandalism is in progress as he keeps nominating only Christian biography entries for deletion; most of which are authors of numerous books and presidents of universities. He is up to 10 and counting. --Jason Gastrich 05:47, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * User A.J.A. is, apparently, a Christian. Gastrich's complaint is based on the fact that it's his articles that are being nominated.  Gastrich's obvious disagreement that the articles should be deleted is not evidence of bad faith on the part of A.J.A., nor is it vandalism. - WarriorScribe 06:01, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Untrue. I didn't write all of those articles. When a person nominates only 10 Christian biographies in the same day (some of which you voted to keep), it's vandalism. --Jason Gastrich 06:05, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I sit corrected. Indeed, not all were originally written by Gastrich.  However, there is no definition of vandalism that I know of that says that an editor (and a Christian) nominating articles for deletion that he/she feels should be deleted constitutes "vandalism."  By the way, I only voted to keep one.  It's still not vandalism.  - WarriorScribe 06:07, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm trying to correct the fact that there are a bunch of unencyclopedic stubs (mostly started by you) about people in your little corner of fundamentalism. A.J.A. 06:09, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Cleaning up an encyclopedia is certainly a noble goal. I'm still waiting for how it is that the fact that they happen to be "Christian" biographies, most of which Gastrich either wrote or edited (and many of which are, hey, surprise, affiliated with LBU) is "vandalism" or constitutes "bad faith" editing. - WarriorScribe 06:14, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm mostly agnostic (literally and figuratively in this debate) but as an outsider, this certainly looks like a vendetta, A.J.A. Could be coincidence, as some of your AFD noms look legit, but others are hard to construe as good faith, try as I might.  Not really vandalism by my definition, but especailly in light of the personal attacks I have to wonder about your motivations. - Jaysus Chris 06:37, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I had a look and if I thought it wasn't notable, I nominated it. There were some I didn't nominate. A.J.A. 06:46, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, but it might serve you to review Notability. "Published authors, editors, and photographers who have written books with an audience of 5,000 or more or in periodicals with a circulation of 5,000 or more."  I don't have time to go through all of your AFD nominations, every one I have looked at more than satisfies this criterea. - Jaysus Chris 06:50, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Given Mr Gastrich's dubious conduct in relation to these AfDs, including vote recruiting based on some perceived vendetta, I'm surprised he's drawing attention to them. I haven't seen a policy forbidding vote recruiting, but going on about this persecution is at least skirting WP:NPA and WP:AGF. Given his experience on this website he should understand our deletion policy by now, and why nominating 10 or indeed 100 articles in good faith does not constitute vandalism. --Malthusian (talk) 09:31, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Let's make one thing clear.I'm looking up each person individually on the internet and forming an independent opinion of each before I vote.Because of this I won't even have time to look at some of the names until tomorrow.If I were just rubber stamping each right in a row you would have a right to complain, otherwise it's ridiculous. No where on that talk page do I promise how I'll vote.I said I would check out.I don't know how I will vote until I look at each one. Are you trying to obstruct freedom of speech between other wikians ? This is getting to feel more like some sort of vendetta by the moment. California12 03:13, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Assuming you're talking to me (please use indenting so people can follow the thread structure (fixed since post) ), I haven't ever suggested, neither here nor in the AfDs, that you shouldn't vote just Gastrich notified you of the discussions, or that your votes were rubber stamping. All I'm saying is that a) nominating several similar articles is not vandalism (true), that going onto talk pages to ask people to vote a certain way is generally bad form (true) and that nailing oneself to a cross directly violates WP:AGF, skirts WP:NPA and is generally not a constructive way to develop this encyclopaedia (true). --Malthusian (talk) 11:30, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Jason notified me because I've been discussing with him several cases where possibly biased actions were taken against articles or users that were Christian.I am the one who originally initiated these discussions.He asked me to vote and voice an opinion, but he did not ask me to vote a certain way.California12 04:06, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I can't help feeling that's a rather academic distinction when he begins his request with bemoaning the atheist cabal and attacking a good editor as a troll. --Malthusian (talk) 12:18, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No action taken. As this is either a content or a user dispute, depending on the way you choose to look at it, please see the dispute resolution process. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 15:46, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Cooliomccool has been vandalising India related pages since yesterdays, , . When i confronted him on his talkpage, he racially abused me .अमेय आरयन AMbroodEY 18:37, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Blocked by Longhair. Wikibofh(talk) 18:44, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Moved alert from "Pages" to "Registered users". // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 16:13, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * has been removing links to Bogdanov affair from articles. His second-ever edit was to replace the redirect at Bogdanoff affair with a copy of the page itself. Crossposting this to WP:AN/I. --Angr ( tɔk ) 14:11, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No action taken, as this appears to be a content dispute. The user has removed references to a disputed theory from pages that describe various hoaxes, which may be a good-faith desire to disassociate a potentially valid theory from known hoaxes. Please see the dispute resolution process and relist if the user makes any arguably bad-faith edits. // Pathoschild 05:30, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * - user has been uploading nonattributed images of various World Wrestling Entertainment divas, as well as altering articles on said divas to include them. Possible clueless newbieism, however nature of images (photo spreads on Playboy, wardrobe malfunctions, etc) may be a sign of vandalism.  Perhaps user believes Wikipedia is an image repository, for which it is not. kelvSYC 08:23, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Also to add: vandalized Trailer Park Boys.
 * No action taken. This user does not seem to have made any edits that are clearly bad faith, and there has been no attempt that I can see to discuss the issue with the user. Uploading images of semi-dressed or undressed woman in not in itself an indication of bad faith, nor is their inclusion into articles. Please see Assume Good Faith and the dispute resolution process. // Pathoschild 05:39, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * - Mikeabundo has been constantly deleting links from the community pages simply because the deleted links in question appear to be competing against one cosplay webpage he owns that had already listed in the community sites. He is also close to breaking the 3RR rule, having edited more than once a day several times, and usually every time the link he has been deleting is re-added. Attempted tries to reach dispute resolution has failed. Mirshariff 11:44, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No action taken, as this seems to be a content dispute; please see the dispute resolution process. If good-faith attempts to do so have failed, please provide links supporting this (in particular, links to any requests for comment, requests for mediation, and requests for arbitration pages if applicable). This alert will be archived soon if no further activity is reported. // Pathoschild 05:19, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * - Repeated malicious/nonsense edits to Jesus. Justin Eiler 19:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No action taken, user stopped after warnings.. // Pathoschild 05:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * - keeps making the following edit on the David Irving article: -Carabinieri 15:10, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * User already blocked one day for 3RR violation. // Pathoschild 05:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * - Super Grover has made several personal attacks on User:Chadbryant, repeatedly adding his picture to the Terry Funk article and making libellous allegations. He has also persistently edited the Percy Pringle page without explanation and in the face of accepted facts. Several other registered users, e.g., have made virtually identical edits to Super Grover, so an IP check might be prudent in case sokc puppets are being used. McPhail 20:42, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * The user is already indefinitely blocked. // Pathoschild 05:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * - user has been uploading nonattributed images of various World Wrestling Entertainment divas, as well as altering articles on said divas to include them. Possible clueless newbieism, however nature of images (photo spreads on Playboy, wardrobe malfunctions, etc) may be a sign of vandalism.  Perhaps user believes Wikipedia is an image repository, for which it is not. kelvSYC 08:23, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Also to add: vandalized Trailer Park Boys.
 * No action taken. This user does not seem to have made any edits that are clearly bad faith, and there has been no attempt that I can see to discuss the issue with the user. Uploading images of semi-dressed or undressed woman in not in itself an indication of bad faith, nor is their inclusion into articles. Please see Assume Good Faith and the dispute resolution process. // Pathoschild 05:39, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * - Mikeabundo has been constantly deleting links from the community pages simply because the deleted links in question appear to be competing against one cosplay webpage he owns that had already listed in the community sites. He is also close to breaking the 3RR rule, having edited more than once a day several times, and usually every time the link he has been deleting is re-added. Attempted tries to reach dispute resolution has failed. Mirshariff 11:44, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No action taken, as this seems to be a content dispute; please see the dispute resolution process. If good-faith attempts to do so have failed, please provide links supporting this (in particular, links to any requests for comment, requests for mediation, and requests for arbitration pages if applicable). This alert will be archived soon if no further activity is reported. // Pathoschild 05:19, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * - Repeated malicious/nonsense edits to Jesus. Justin Eiler 19:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No action taken, user stopped after warnings.. // Pathoschild 05:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * - keeps making the following edit on the David Irving article: -Carabinieri 15:10, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * User already blocked one day for 3RR violation. // Pathoschild 05:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * - Super Grover has made several personal attacks on User:Chadbryant, repeatedly adding his picture to the Terry Funk article and making libellous allegations. He has also persistently edited the Percy Pringle page without explanation and in the face of accepted facts. Several other registered users, e.g., have made virtually identical edits to Super Grover, so an IP check might be prudent in case sokc puppets are being used. McPhail 20:42, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * The user is already indefinitely blocked. // Pathoschild 05:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

December 2005

 * Replacing U.S. state articles with F...CK YOU!! repeated quite a few times Macintosh User 00:18, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Already indefinitely blocked for vandalism. // Pathoschild 02:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * keeps hitting Template:User GWB, while pleading ignorance of wiki norms, obviously a user who's been registered since 2004, can't be allowed to plead "newbieness" in order to excuse blatent vandalism--63.22.72.236 05:21, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Misunderstanding, no action taken. // Pathoschild 02:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * - keeps adding general nonsense and also reverts the warnings on his page to nonsense. Djegan 20:12, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
 * User stopped after last warning, list at WP:AIV after proper warnings if they persist. // Pathoschild 02:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * - Has just a few edits, but since they include a (now deleted) page
 * User already indefinitely blocked for vandalism. // Pathoschild 02:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)