Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/MalachiMartin

I have repeatedly tried to have a constructive dialogue with the complainant. However, I have been accused of bias on several occassions, with no apparent supporting evidence. The amendments I have made to the lead reflect an obituary made in a mainstream newspaper (LA Times) that talks about Martin's "obsession with satanism". Indeed, this is what he is most notably known for - his writings about exorcism. Likewise I have tried to reflect in the lead the suggestion elsewhere in the article that he was a promoter of unsubstantiated claims against the Catholic Church and believed in conspiracies. Not only is this supported by the article (which sets out claims about freemasonry, communist pacts, and atheism among senior clergy which cannot be substantiated by the complainant) but is also directly supported by a reference to Martin's own words. My concern is that this article remains badly written - most of the sources within it are highly partisan nor mainstream and there is a level of detail which seems only intended to give an over-importance to the article subject which is not merited. Furthermore the complaint hasmade claims about Martin's popularity which are not backed up and makes claims about regular tv coverage which is not supported by the sources. Contaldo80 (talk) 08:57, 6 September 2012 (UTC)