Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Prem Rawat 5

Purpose
The Aldridge sentence that we spend a month discussing has been dealt with. I am reluctant to raise old issues, even if they were not fully discussed, just for the sake of having something to talk about. While it's possible that another issue will come up sooner or later that will require mediation, I suggest we withdraw this request until it's actually needed.  Will Beback   talk    03:34, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Agree. I think we have all acted commendably in solving the above problem. Hopefully that will continue. Rumiton (talk) 15:59, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Continue to make mountains out of molehills? I hope not.   Will Beback    talk    20:07, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Will, I am going to give you a "sigh". Here it is: sigh. Rumiton (talk) 09:04, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Agree to withdrawing the request for mediation on this issue. -- Mael e fique (t a lk) 21:17, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Agree with Will. Though sometimes there are tricky caverns hidden under what appears to be "molehills"...--Rainer P. (talk) 13:16, 10 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your comments all. I've rejected the request. If mediation becomes necessary at any point in future, please do file a fresh request. Regards, AGK   11:43, 11 June 2010 (UTC)