Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Ross Jeffries

Okay, I guess we'll start even though WoodenBuddha still seems to be on wikibreak. If it's okay with both of you, I think it would be best to begin with issues that do not seem to concern WoodenBuddha. (I think that would be whether speed seduction is a cult, whether Ross Jeffries is relevant, and whether court cases involving Ross Jeffries are relevant, and should be included in the article.) Armedblowfish (talk|mail|contribs) 22:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 22:40, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Some opening questions

 * Would you consider speed seduction's status as a cult or non-cult to be a fact (something that is either true or false) or opinion? If a fact, why, and is there another term that would be considered less controversial? If an opinion, isn't this really about presenting both points of view in a neutral way?


 * What, specifically, is in dispute regarding the issue listed as "Wiether Ross Jeffries is relevant"?

Armedblowfish (talk|mail|contribs) 22:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 22:40, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Are these court cases, in your opinion, relevant to Ross Jeffries' notability? Is there enough information to verify Ross Jeffries' involvment in these cases? Is there any reason to think that this would raise WP:BLP concerns?

Closed
See project page. Armedblowfish (talk|mail|contribs) 20:34, 12 September 2006 (UTC)