Wikipedia talk:Requests for removal of adminship/Straw poll/2015

RfC

 * A Request for Comment on a proposal to create a new process to allow for removal of adminship through community discussion. I welcome everyone's thoughts on this. - jc37 05:22, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Support

 * Support Looks to be simple and uncontroversial enough to work. But where are the other voters? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Per Wikipedia talk:Requests for removal of adminship. Delegating desysopping to ArbCom is better than letting the community handle most of it. ArbCom is slow, but will eventually desysop unfit admins. Sure, the recent desysop of has been criticized as rash, but if members of the community can't elect, in their view, responsible arbitrators, then they probably can't desysop admins responsibly. If ArbCom is the bottleneck, then maybe a streamlined "Level III" process for admin desysopping (for cases that don't fall under Level I and II removal procedures) would be better? Esquivalience  t 21:16, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose, same issues these proposals usually have, with the main issue (although certainly not the only issue) being a lack of evidence that there are vital desysoppings that would go through this process that can't otherwise be handled by the community or by Arbcom. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:24, 8 November 2015 (UTC)