Wikipedia talk:Right to vote

Rejected proposal
this proposal was rejected by the community; see Right to vote/Proposal-- Phoenix 15 11:23, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

"Official wikipedia membership"
I have no idea what this phrase is supposed to be referring to. Please elucidate. John Carter (talk) 02:07, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Still rejected
Per the reasons outlined in the last discussion.

This proposal still does not address concerns that
 * New editors may still contribute useful ideas to discussions and decisions;
 * Save for ArbCom elections – which already have suffrage requirements – no Wikipedia processes are treated as straight up-and-down votes;
 * Current Wikipedia practices and procedures are still quite good at detecting single-purpose accounts, sockpuppets, votestacking, and other problems; and
 * This proposal may discourage newcomers from participating fully in Wikipedia.

Indeed, the proposal is virtually identical to the original, rejected document. Changes made were to wording rather than substance. I'll also note that this proposal's chief proponent doesn't qualify to 'vote' under the criteria that he has proposed. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 02:59, 3 March 2008 (UTC)