Wikipedia talk:Sociology of Wikipedia via Rorty and Berger

Untitled
The wikipedians were here.

this would be a low template:copyedit prioity I'm sure, but it needs work. my gut tells me even those in relevent academic fields would agree that some of this language should be clearer. However, I'm not entirely qualified to make a good guess what the authors intent is in certain sections. I'll point out specifics if needed. the style's a little ,,, hmmm muddly I guess? needs a rework. I'll do it, if no one else comes a long after a bit. Kzz Rzz  Knocker  19:37, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

As an essay, this is such a low priority article for copy-editing that unless the authors want to do it, or someone actively wants to do it, I don't think it should have the copy-edit tag. If no one looks at this in the next week, I'll take the tag off.Cricketgirl 16:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Copyediting help offered - but the other problems are too big
This article needs so many things, I don't know where to begin.Levalley (talk) 01:48, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm in agreement with Cricketgirl above - the copyedit tag needs to go. Not even fair to write a personal essay and then expect wikipedians to make it read properly.--Levalley (talk) 23:55, 9 April 2009 (UTC)