Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet investigations/Applodion

This page has been created in the Wikipedia talk namespace due to restrictions on page creation by unregistered users. Please move this page to the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you. This edit request was created automatically by the SPI template. 84.216.128.207 (talk) 09:38, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: The page already exists (Sockpuppet investigations/Applodion), you should be able to add this to it yourself. Tollens (talk) 20:01, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
User Special:Contributions/Dl.thinker kept reverting ALL edits that contradicts the Zionist narrative regarding the Battle of Jenin in 1948 This is the article in question: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Jenin_(1948)

Dl.thinker kept spamming the revert-function to ALL edits that contradict the neutral POV in favor of the extremist Zionist narrative. By all accounts the Battle of Jenin is the most significant battle of the 1948 war and the fanatical Zionist militias resorted to using human-wave formation attacks against the highly professional British-trained Iraqi army in a desperate attempt to capture Jenin. This of course didn’t happen, and they suffered 1600 casualties including 600 dead against the defending Iraqis’ 48 dead. I warned Dl.thinker to cease his disruptive and extremist behavior, but he refused to answer. Instead, his sockpuppet (? not sure how many accounts he runs and which one is the master, but there is a very strong overlap betweeen Special:Contributions/Dl.thinker  and Special:Contributions/Applodion It wouldn’t surprise me if we were to discover and root out a large pro-Zionist botnet if we conducted a checkuser. 84.216.128.207 (talk) 09:38, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


 * To clarify, I wrote the article Battle of Jenin (1948) in 2019. Several years later, another editor (Dl.thinker) also began editing the article in question, just as several other editors did. I have never used any sockpuppets, and any clerk is welcome to check my data in this regard. It seems that the anon who opened this request was annoyed that their unsourced changes to the article in question were being reverted. Applodion (talk) 21:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC)