Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet investigations/GizzyCatBella

Protected edit request on 26 June 2018
As I suspect the technical CU will be inconclusive (due to the long track record), I would like to add the following new evidence:
 * 1) On 24 June 2018, GizzyCatBella reverted once and then reverted again after being challenged (mangling the infobox on the way) to a version containing a highly defamatory WP:HOAX - I refer to the AE closure here. What is of interest to the SPI case, is that this is an article with around 4 page views per day (when it is not a subject at AE). Poeticbent has a very long history with this article and this version, as reverted repeated challenges to this version over the years: in Apr 2016, April 2015, April 2015, Feb 2014, Mar 2013. The WP:HOAX version was first inserted by Lewinowicz who per Loosmark SPI archive was matched to Poeticbent - in March 2011 -.  WWII material (not in hoax turf) was also added by Stawiski in Aug 2018 who per Loosmark SPI archive was also matched to Poeticbent - . Most of the editing history from the addition of the material in 2011, to its removal in March 2018 - consists of challenges to the Material and Poeticbent reverting - almost every else is minor gnoming or random vandalism (e.g. ).
 * 2) As of 26 June 2018, per  GizzyCatBella edited 390 unique pages, per editor intersection - 186 of them intersect with Poeticbent - or 47.6%. I suspect the mainspace intersection rate is even higher, but I haven't been able to figure out how to get a unique page edit count per main space (144 of the 186 intersection are on mains pace articles - suggesting article space intersection would be much higher). Icewhiz (talk) 06:17, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:21, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Evidence from Piotrus
I just want to say the following:
 * Poeticbent has disclosed his real life identity on Wikipedia, it is linked from his user page
 * Tatzref and GCB did not. I've exchanged several emails with both of them. GCB is using an anonymous email and does not reveal anything identifying. She directly told me she is NOT Poeticbent when I've asked about this in a recent email (for what's a statement like this is worth it). Tatzref, however, is also using what appears to be a real name ID. In fact he contacted me few months ago and asked how can he edit Wikipedia, after I explained it to him he registered an account and became active. For privacy reasons, I am not willing to disclose his real life ID (WP:OUTING, basic decency, etc.) but unless I am a victim of some elaborate deception I very much doubt he is a sock of anyone's.
 * For what it's worth, I believe those are three separate individuals, connected at best by similar interest. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:54, 2 July 2018 (UTC)