Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet investigations/Random account 39949472

Trying to close your own case
The now-confirmed sock User:Tilliego tried to decline and close the case against her before anyone might notice. Is this a common experience? WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:38, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Haven't seen it happen very often, but reverting, blocking, and ignoring is the way to go for this. Glad to see if got handled. NW ( Talk ) 21:40, 30 November 2009 (UTC)


 * It's a sign that the sockmaster is getting savvy to the SPI process. Pretty unusual, surprisingly, and if it continues you might have to consider alternate methods of getting checkuser assistance. Nathan  T 21:45, 30 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, given the number of SPI reports I've filed -- not even counting anyone else's efforts -- it would be surprising if she weren't. I'm also convinced that she keeps tabs on Special:Contributions/WhatamIdoing and/or watchlists this page.
 * Should we think about handing future reports via e-mail to a CU editor? WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:17, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * It'd probably be better to keep the record here. Then when "the Jessica Liao sock" is referred to, the history is very easy to see. It's obvious she's watching this page and quite adept in it, but that doesn't have much bearing on needing to keep it quiet. tedder (talk) 00:31, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

(On a side note) Non-clerks can not endorse/decline or archive cases, the bot will not allow it. I mean, they can make the edit but it will not do anything so there is no needs to worry there. Cheers, Tiptoety  talk 00:23, 4 December 2009 (UTC)