Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Inputbox blank report for CU request

. -- IRP ☎ 03:30, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Exactly. There's no harm in sticking to AGF-wording in the SPI request, and the formal wording should very much assume that the accused are non-socks. If you still want this changed, please seek some consensus at WT:SPI first. -- Amalthea 23:15, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, but we try to assume good faith until we accuse them of sock puppetry. Once we believe that someone is sock puppeteering, we no longer assume good faith. We assume bad faith. Nevertheless, it does happen from time to time that one or more people are wrongly accused. -- IRP ☎ 20:19, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * One editor might, but that doesn't mean that the template should do the same. Personally, I think the "party or parties" wording is more awkward, and I don't see the benefit. -- Amalthea 09:30, 8 April 2009 (UTC)