Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet investigations/Tbf69

Other sock puppet
just trying to help a little, so in regard to, shouldn't the fact that user has also been blocked as a sock puppet of user  be recorded and archived with this investigation's report? perhaps somewhere else? perhaps the is sufficient?  P.I. Ellsworth &thinsp;, ed.  put'er there 00:49, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * , there's a link to the sockpuppet category in the SPI header, which I think is sufficient, but you can point out the other account in the "Comments by other users" section if you want. The issue with your original edit was that I didn't block the account you added in my initial filing - they were blocked based on CU evidence after the fact, so none of the information in my filing actually pertains to that account. It's not really a big deal, but it could be misleading to people who are unfamiliar with SPI procedures. Spicy (talk) 00:59, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Ah, you can count me among those people unfamiliar with procedures here – I totally missed the link to the category. Probably shouldn't add any more to a closed SPI, so I'll leave things as they are. Thank you very much for your counsel on this! Oh! and congratulations on your recent good fortune!  P.I. Ellsworth &thinsp;, ed.  put'er there 01:15, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * "recent good fortune"? Did you get money you failed to tell me about? After all, I voted for you; that's worth at least a nickel.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:28, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah, after I passed RfA they doubled my salary. Spicy (talk) 01:39, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * If you had failed, they would've tripled it.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:56, 14 April 2023 (UTC)