Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet investigations/VarahaDas

Insulting doesnt improves your argument at the eyes of wise people
Insulting doesn t improves your argument at the eyes of wise people. @Skyerise The first article has lines that suggested intention of complete difamation, using not neutral words that lot of users dennonced. I just saw that when the article was renewed, there was somethings that didnt still work for a page with the reputation of wiki, as puting in personal life, as only point, a rumour born from some people wich was descredit throught judicial way. The court prove wrong what they claimed and as the damage of one person has to be prevented by justice,they forbidden publish on newspapers. And then you put a rumour of this people as only point in personal life, not but is nonsense and even ridiculous. You claim that im a puppet, or somekind of fake arguer, but is wrong, im actually an artist, Instagram :@3spinosa_art i dont live in the ashram, but know already my Guru and trust him, he changed my life. By insulting without even describing what for you is a puppet, you are only showing that you have no arguments apart from difamation techniques. You are doing pressumptions and free accusations while carrying spiritual names wich karmically is very dangerous. But notice that our interest is not speak with you all life, but at least the article should have some degree of neutrality and written with property. And if i try to help for that you can come and call us puppets, if you want, i dont care, only you show what kind of reasources you justify with your articles, because is the same mess. Vishnu Das Rafael Espinosa (talk) 14:34, 19 September 2023 (UTC)


 * We report what the reliable sources say. Nothing more, nothing less. Subject's PR firm shouldn't be editing here. Skyerise (talk) 15:35, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Im not public relationship nor in Bhakti Marga neither in any enterprise. People consider that this kind of users, who lie, probably are the same/s with different nicknames, and difamate without giving more argument that negative words put in a mustbe neutral context..so you decide what is reliable? So exactly like what was proved at court as fake? You play the game of using words very cheap… But God knows better, dont forget Vishnu Das Rafael Espinosa (talk) 15:51, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 * What appears in the news and what doesn't is all the play of the divine, is it not? And how Wikipedia's rules for sourcing and balance interact with what appears in the news, why that's all part of the divine play too. But there has been recruitment here from reddit, and that's not playing by the rules. It's still part of the divine play, though, right? Skyerise (talk) 16:00, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Please wikipedia, i will not answer more. Take care please of this burden…you can see there is not valid techniques that this people use appart of free accusation cheap and insults degrading people. i thought i was diplomatic and accurate in what i say, too busy in my life to be pr, bye Vishnu Das Rafael Espinosa (talk) 16:01, 19 September 2023 (UTC)