Wikipedia talk:Suspected sock puppets/86.175.64.136

What is going on here?
The first IP edit was not a revert to any previous version, it was a brand new edit. The IP editor was then faced with Traditional unionist undoing edits without explanation, misusing Twinkle, and also had to face another editor abusing rollback. Traditional unionist reverted five times and was edit warring before the IP editor even arrived, and IP editor who was then appallingly treated and had this ridiculous sockpuppet report made with no evidence whatsoever. Traditional unionist has a long history of blocks for edit warring, so to say he was treated unfairly when he received only a 24 hour block for his fifth block for edit warring is ridiculous, especially considering the circumstances. One editor broke 3RR, and were it not for abuse of automated tools by more than one editor the IP editor wouldn't even have needed to keep reverting. Domer48 (talk) 20:31, 5 June 2008 (UTC)