Wikipedia talk:Suspected sock puppets/Henchman 2000

I would just like to note that as a rules lawyer the sockpuppetry case did not follow correct procedure.

On WP:SSP, it says

1. "Largely used for legitimate activies"? I would say yes. Sure, there has been some suspected inappropriateness, but that wouldn't qualify as "largely"

2. "Tag the user page of the suspected puppet account." This was not done. Only Henchmen's account was tagged. (AFAICT at least)

Just sayin' McKay 05:40, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, I did tag Bowsy's userpage . Also, "legitimate" means "appropriate", not "inappropriate". So, around the time the sockpuppet case started, basically, the only subject Bowsy edited that Henchman didn't was Racing Frogs. I knew when the case was closed that they are seperate individuals, not sockpuppets. –Llama mantalkcontribs 01:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)