Wikipedia talk:Suspected sock puppets/Ronyoung99

It is true that the response I made to the discussion about Claus Moller was my first entry, but that does NOT mean that I'm pretending to be somebody else. I did a search for Claus Moller as I was planning on attending one of his seminars that a friend recommended and as I looked through the search results in Google, I was intrigued to see an entry into Wikipedia that was marked for deletion. Having gone in to read about it, I felt it necessary to correct some of the obvious wrongs being stated by other reviewers and created an account in order to do so. This does not mean that this will be my only contribution to Wikipedia and, as you will see, I have already started adding content to other articles as well. Being Danish means that I have grown up seeing Claus Moller on TV, reading about him in newspapers and attending several of his seminars while I still lived in Denmark. With regards to being a sock puppet because I frame my argument properly is just downright frivolous on your behalf. I majored in communications at university and therefore know how to construct an argument. Unfortunately, this is more than can be said for several of the people on here. It seems to me to a case of if it isn't American it isn't good enough to be on Wikipedia. Well, I, for one, am proud of my Danish roots and would like to see more Danish people who have brought a real contribution to the world in terms of improving people's lives rather than profiles of contestants on one of numerous American reality/trash TV programmes.PRasmussen (talk) 10:51, 3 April 2008 (UTC) Just to make the point about the very American bias. If you have a look at the profile for Jan Leschly it states that This article about an American businessperson is a stub. As you will see from his Wimbledon record as well as the very first line of the Wikipedia entry he is Danish.PRasmussen (talk) 11:11, 3 April 2008 (UTC)