Wikipedia talk:Suspected sock puppets/ScienceApologist

Interesting
Well, this will be interesting, given that PoToast is speculated at WR to be somebody else :-) Shot info (talk) 04:04, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * WR?  Seicer  (talk) (contribs) 04:06, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Shhh, special secret cabal stuff if you don't know what that is, which makes the result even more delicious in it's unfolding :-) Shot info (talk) 04:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * ^ What are you talking about? Please show respect for your fellow editors and don't ignore questions, particularly not with a flippant and taunting commment. Dlabtot (talk) 04:24, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * He just won't learn of my secret goodies now.  Seicer  (talk) (contribs) 04:32, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia Review. It's seems to be for those who feel WP doesn't already have enough drama. :) Ronnotel (talk) 04:38, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I just registered there. They need an update to this dead thread. :O)  Seicer  (talk) (contribs) 04:41, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Heck Dlabtot, your words of wisdom have overawed me into silence. I'm truely impressed with your editorial management techniques.  < for those-that-should-know-better-but-don't, that's said firmly with tongue in check. Shot info (talk) 04:51, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Again I ask: What are you talking about? Is this an attempt at humor? Dlabtot (talk) 04:56, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * (restart) Sarcasm. I'm angry not at that, but because there is no thread at WR about me!!! :O(  Seicer  (talk)

(contribs) 04:57, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Ignoring Dlabtot's attempts to inflame the situation: Seicer, thought you might appriciate what you will find on there.  Look up PoT while you are there.  Shot info (talk) 05:00, 15 February 2008 (UTC)