Wikipedia talk:Suspected sock puppets/Subhash bose (3rd)

Comment: - Actually the report (checkuser) came out inconclusive while admin dab (no friend of Netaji's) stated "I came across your account, and your statement that you were mistaken for a sockpuppet of . I see, indeed, no strong indication that you are". As for edit counts, Hkelkar has 117 which means he has enough edit counts to not seriously be considered a sock. Terry J Ho has barely twice that much. If you look at main space edits, Hkelkar has 55 while terryJHo has only 64. As for Terry's insinuation that I am a meatpuppet (with his IP), at this point I have over 13 times as many main space edits as him.Bakaman Bakatalk 19:23, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the comments,the Admins who deal with these cases know what to do, your informing them of the background is irrelevant.Ideally, it is for the user who is under scrutiny to give their comments.TerryJ-Ho 19:32, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Reply - In this case it is quite relevant, noting that User:Haphar and User:Geek1975 made accusations like that against me (of being a sock of Subhash), and that you are fairly cozy with Geek1975. I still havent forgot the sock case harrassment.Bakaman Bakatalk 19:35, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Quantity is not the sole indicator of how well you have contributed - a well referenced source from well respected newspapers and journals far more better.You give the impression that I have dubious behavior when you say that "....(with his IP)" - you should note the very next edit made a minute after where I inserted my user name.Also what made you conclude that you are fairly cozy with Geek1975as far as I remember,I have only had one communication with him so far. May I request you to use the discussion page of this article for your comments hereafter if you wish TerryJ-Ho 20:01, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

- I never said it was your sock, I merely documented that you made an edit from your IP.Bakaman Bakatalk 20:07, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The way it was mentioned could have led others construe that TerryJ-Ho