Wikipedia talk:Suspected sock puppets/TheYieldCurve

Comment about case
Would you please discuss my deletions from this project page rather than deleting them? Your behavior recently has been erratic.

I think I am acting more in the spirit of a Wikipedia editor than you are. You are a deletionist or disinclusionist. Whereas, I am an inclusionist. Also, I now start a discussion on the talk page for major (though not minor changes); this is something you asked me to do and I am following it to the best of my ability!

As you know, my comments to the project page were NOT a disruptive edit because you allowed it to stand for 5 days. Also, my text was added to the comments section (rather than the evidence section); I believe I have an equal right (as all non-admins do) to weigh in; so you shouldn't have erased it, whether you thought it was or wasn't relevant. The farthest you should have gone is used --strikethrough-- text, but not blanked my text.

I think my text was relevant because it showed that Shalom's statement lacked credibility. I was trying to 'help' you by displaying this shortcoming in this case; this should have spurred other editors joining the conversation, rather than having a chilling effect. I would ask that you please tone down your unilateral behavior. I am trying to act as a better member of the community and act bi- or multi-laterally and I hope you do too. --Inetpup:o3  ⌈〒⌋▰⌈♎⌋ 09:19, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Your edits are not helpful because they don't add any evidence or relevant information within the context of this case. All you're trying to do is stir up more drama on a project page over a user who has since left Wikipedia. Knock it off. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 18:58, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * User:Shalom Yechiel has left Wikipedia, not the users in the case. If you continue to add irrelevant or antagonizing messages on this page I will report you. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 15:55, 23 July 2008 (UTC)