Wikipedia talk:TWA/Portal/Archive 3

Feedback
I really liked the guided step-by-step. And the music clips!
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Possibly an added Note on embedded file formats v. uploaded image file formats...I think many Users will see a 'short' file format that might be confusing if the User isn't aware of the difference. This clarification might be helpful since both options are available.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Ladyj88 (talk) 18:39, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
I really loved the adventure! I thought I cannot know more about Wikipedia, it just feels amazing to finally know how to use it perfectly, I only had one mistake, I can't actually believe it, it is better than any tutorials I have played on, considering the cool background for the game, and the live-chat tutorial! I had fun and I don't regret wasting these times I've had with it!
 * What I liked:

Actually, the mistake I had traveled upon was one of the hardest questions, that is to choose between 3 categories, I think the game needs more of that AWESOME tips before they take the question.
 * What I didn't like:

Tips before questions.
 * What I wanted more of:

Nothing is unnecessary! I feel pumped!
 * What was unnecessary:

Nah, I personally said all that I wanted to share above.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--~Cry (talk) 19:16, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--122.105.146.208 (talk) 00:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Feedback on 'The Wikipedia Adventure'
From a beginner's perspective, I think 'The Adventure' provides a fairly good introduction and walkthrough to Wikipedia. It was fine to have 'Earth' as the recurring article to work with and add to as the introduction progressed. I got a good 'feel' of the user interface and the way to do things. But that's only from a beginner's perspective. Experienced editors may have something they would like to add. Maybe I myself will change my mind about 'The Adventure' when I get more experience, it is difficult to say beforehand...
 * What I liked:


 * What I didn't like:
 * I didn't like the toon character. The various drawings of the toon were poorly made. I think you should make up another toon from scratch. Have a graphical designer or a cartoonist look into it, please.
 * In Mission 4 on 'The Neutral Point of View', there was a particular message I didn't like. The message said: "The NPOV policy: Articles must not take sides, but should explain the sides, fairly and without bias. This applies both to what you say and how you say it. Give this a good, deep brain inhale. Let it soak into your cortexes. Think you got it?" I think the tone of this message is way out of place. It sounds impatient, unfriendly and aggressive. Maybe the administrative layers of Wikipedia are tired of explaining the same things over and over again to the newcomers - but hey, that tiredness is of no concern to the newcomers. Please, think this one over. Thx.

By the end of 'The Adventure', I would like a short list of the 'what is next', the more advanced editing techniques and issues. This list should contain a short description of these editing techniques and issues, and then some relevant links to further reading. Also, some sample articles displaying the 'what is hot and what is not' when editing Wikipedia would be useful.
 * What I wanted more of:

Nothing unnecessary
 * What was unnecessary:

No, not for the moment.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Gaeanautes (talk) 13:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
Not exactly new to editing wikis but I still played through it, the badges looks pretty sweet.

I saw the thing about using section edits in the bugs section. I want to second that and add that the markup at the top of the page might be a bit confusing to new editors, if we used the section edit feature it would hide those text (at least in the parts before we add sections and where there is a level 1 heading in the earth article).

Another thing is that for the earth article you might want to point out that we don't usually use level 1 headings. and at some point that level 1 heading disappeared. I also suggest introducing templates somewhere in the tutorials because it might be one of the more confusing aspects of editing wiki pages especially if it is used in this tutorial.

--Jinbobo (talk) 15:58, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

feedback(i'm french-not new in editing wiki)
pony = wrong... not the ponyyy i want the flower :)

more seriously:

You say click on "edit" but: if i click on "edit" it is the visual editor and the game don't work.

You would say "click on "edit source".

I wonder why you don't do the game for visual editor, to modify article. There you choose the wikicode interface and never speak about the 2 interfaces(wikicode and visual editor).

Often, if i don't do what is said, like wikilink, and i click "save page". If i don't remember what was required to do, i am bloqued. It say to me "modify the comment of the edit then click to save" but i am blocked, In order to avance, i have to remember what the game wanted i do: make a wikilink on the word XX. If i remember, i can do, click on save, and advance (change page of the game). If i don't remember, i am blocked, and i have not succedded on find the request i had to do (not return when you click on "save").

Vatadoshufrench 10:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

I think about a point that have not be mentionned in the "game": the sandbox. the sandbox is important for a "newbie" who want to write an article and you don't speak once about it.

Vatadoshufrench 19:20, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
Very helpful, but I would have preferred to have been linked to this course immediately as soon as I created my account Amalek 0123456789 (talk) 21:52, 1 June 2015 (UTC) Nowhere in the tutorial are one learning the concept of "New Section" perhaps you should add that? Amalek 0123456789 (talk) 21:55, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
The format, also the editing.
 * What I liked:

Nothing.
 * What I didn't like:

How to undo vandalism. Everything was great.
 * What I wanted more of:
 * What was unnecessary:

None.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Quantum Particles (talk) 14:13, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
Nice teaching thingy!
 * What I liked:

Nothing
 * What I didn't like:

Bugfixes
 * What I wanted more of:

Hmmm.. nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

Recommended
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Hans5958 / Hans T.M ║ Lets Talk! ║ Sign my Guestbook! 11:57, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked: How it moved smoothly

...
 * What I didn't like: nothing

...
 * What I wanted more of: humor

...
 * What was unnecessary: I don't know

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share: nope.

--Skylivy (talk) 23:42, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Updated 'What to do next' section - Tips library
Greetings, Over the last several months I have updated WP:TIPS and thought it would be helpful to add a link to the Tips library for TWA. Regards, JoeHebda (talk) 02:25, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
The basic design, looks like it was illustrated by a super idealistic and smart child. =)
 * What I liked:

Sometimes I did a task but because I accidentally clicked back had to start over. But learned not to over time, no biggie.
 * What I didn't like:

I wish the music was cooler.
 * What I wanted more of:

The sound recordings, at least like this. Would be better to use that field more creatively, maybe an inspirational short pep talk?
 * What was unnecessary:

I loved this game, thank you so much for setting me on my adventure!
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--KeremTimurGunes (talk) 22:34, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 27 June 2015
Paula frederick (talk) 05:27, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I have deactivated this requeast as it's not clear what changes, if any, you want to be made. - Evad37 &#91;talk] 05:47, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
Everything.
 * What I liked:

Nothing.
 * What I didn't like:

It needed nothing more of anything.
 * What I wanted more of:

Nothing.
 * What was unnecessary:

I loved your game.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Coconuts31 (talk) 17:36, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
Interactive, like real Wikipedia pages
 * What I liked:

???
 * What I didn't like:

More advanced topics such as some formatting stuff like that, maybe in another Adventure thing?
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Very nice tutorial.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--RTao (talk) 21:05, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Duplicate badges
Hi... i started the adventure the other day. completed some sections. it seems i redid a couple of sections and more than one badge was added to my page for completing them correctly. any chance you all can delete the redundant badges and then i will complete any sections i haven't. thank you much for your help. Taoyin2004 (talk) 12:22, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi Taoyin2004. Click edit on your userpage and delete the duplicated badges.  You have to do it manually, but you can do it yourself.

Just remove the extra ones. Cheers, Jake Ocaasit &#124; c 17:11, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 17 July 2015
Wikilover1001 (talk) 23:58, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * You have not specified any changes you want to make, so I have deactivated this request - Evad37 &#91;talk] 03:25, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
... This was fun.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 19:17, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... Someone mentioned celebration music. Disappointed that I didn't hear it. Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 19:18, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Jinda 1288 (talk) 06:14, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
...This was a very helpful instructional tool.
 * What I liked:

...I need more guidance about how to submit images to create files for wikimedia commons and articles.
 * What I wanted more of:

...Thank you for designing this educational resource for Wikipedians. I learned what wiki wiki means.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 20:44, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
...is about the step-by-step guide for new users ( me). It is really helpful for me.
 * What I liked:

...is about the glitch of the pop-ups. When you go to another tab, the pop-up will still be present. LOL
 * What I didn't like:

...About the image guideline, I think a caption guideline should be added since it is needed to describe the image.
 * What I wanted more of:

...Nothing is unnecessary in the 'game' which is good!
 * What was unnecessary:

...Maybe the Teahouse can be introduced better in the 'game'?
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Vincent60030 (talk) 06:10, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
The narration is jargon-free and easily understood, more than other help articles in Wikipedia.
 * What I liked:

A bug I found. Here is the explanation, situation, and result. I was playing on the first mission, and had finished the italics part. I skipped the link part accidentally and couldn't go back, and I had already saved and couldn't go on. It should have said 'don't save yet'. I was forced to close the window, as there was no way to continue. So I restarted and earned the editor badge twice, which you can see on my page.
 * What I didn't like:

Previewing pages before you edit them! It was all about saving immediately.
 * What I wanted more of:

It's designed for people for whom it is their first time. Not necessary, as it ignores the people who have had an account for a short time and have gone experimenting. As a teen myself, the approach seemed geared for younger people. I could deal with it, but it seemed kind of strange.
 * What was unnecessary:

I have had a few wikipedia accounts that I have forgotten the information of, like 'brackpedia'. So I have edited before. I had leapt straight into editing, and had mainly gone off of help articles, before playing this. It should be more friendly to people like that, instead of saying your only contributions are on your own page when you have also de-orphaned two pages, expanded a stub, and clarified the difference between fact and fiction on an article struggling with that(Dragonology)
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Brackattax (talk) 19:18, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
I loved the way TWA motivated me to keep going through it and presented it in a fun way.
 * What I liked:

Oh, I liked the audio clips too.

I wish it had more information of vandalism and how to monitor it, and what, exactly counts as vandalism.
 * What I didn't like:

I also with it contained more formatting, such as setting a background, or creating a table/chart.

More missions and advanced topics, please.
 * What I wanted more of:

Nothing I could think of.
 * What was unnecessary:

I feel like it could use some more user interaction, as most of it was just copying and pasting text, or choosing an obvious answer. But it was great fun and I learned more information on how to make Wikipedia a better place!
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

You should have more people see this, as I only stumbled on TWA from Teahouse links on other users' pages.

--PrimateOfKnowledge (talk) 04:37, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
...the step by step guide
 * What I liked:

...nothing in particular
 * What I didn't like:

...more details on citing references that are not available online, such as old newspaper articles that are not available online
 * What I wanted more of:

...nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...Thank you for creating such a wonderful opportunity for everyone to pitch in the world knowledge collaboratively.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Rishi Mano (talk) 07:05, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
Guides me through the basics of editing. Clear step-by-step tutorial and compliments to keep me moving.
 * What I liked:

NOTHING!
 * What I didn't like:

More fun! The copy and pasting. Nothing.
 * What I wanted more of:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Ethan Chui (talk) 03:29, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked: The wittiness and easy learning experience

...
 * What I didn't like: This is a hard to answer. I liked it all.

...
 * What I wanted more of:Technicalities and depth of coverage.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Repeated additions of image for all the subheadings and other repetitive works. We can learn them at once without need fr repetition. Repetitions should be at most 2.

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:Keep encouraging the people to contribute. Love it.

--Faiz7412 (talk) 11:42, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
the whole idea was great. thank you for the trip
 * What I liked:

we followed instructions, posted on FireFox and were speedily deleted ... If this is a sandbox that's what it should be. Not something that goes live and leads to deletions and warnings.SotoWriters (talk) 15:55, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
 * What I didn't like:

about using images, such as alignment
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

how to add images to wikimedia
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Radbleu (talk) 08:05, 20 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi User:SotoWriters, as I explained on your talk page, there were some issues with your userpage. Although the game is 'sandboxed', your userpage is immediately real and public.  We do that so you will have a more established presence right after you play the game.  I'm sorry for the confusion and will try to make it more clear. Jake Ocaasit &#124; c 16:42, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
... I very much enjoyed the guided approach to teaching users the culture and methods associated with Wikipedia editing. I appreciated the interactive aspect, the use of badges as a motivator, and altogether the user-friendliness of the activity. I wish that there were more like it covering advanced concepts!
 * What I liked:

... I can't think of anything I disliked about the activity.
 * What I didn't like:

... I would appreciate it if the tutorial went on a more detailed tour of the Wikipedia interface, especially considering that it is geared towards new users.
 * What I wanted more of:

... If there is anything that I would consider 'unnecessary', it is that a few of the exercises (the 'adding headings' and the 'adding images' exercises were the two that stood out to me the most) ask you to perform the same task several times. While it does certainly give you experience with adding images, etc., the tasks in question weren't overly difficult (in my opinion, at least), so I feel that the practice was a little excessive.
 * What was unnecessary:

... I personally think it might be beneficial to add another module to guide users through advanced editing, so that novice editors might be able to better contribute to Wikipedia from the very beginning. I would also love to see the creators of Wikipedia Adventure create modules on how to make a similar tutorial of one's own. I, for one, would love to help with any future iterations of this project if possible.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

I appreciated the opportunity to provide feedback on this activity as well :)

--Sapientia42 (talk) 03:48, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
...Everything that you thought
 * What I liked:

...Im using E-Tab so it was bid for me to write. But I like all the session it thought me a lot. Thanks
 * What I didn't like:

...Technical skill of writing
 * What I wanted more of:

...Nothing unnecessary
 * What was unnecessary:

...Yes. I'd like to join with the Co-op to experience some ideas.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

-- Ras Benjih &#47; RasTalk 08:44, 31 Jul 10:44, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Feedback

 * What I liked:
 * It shows the basis of Wikipedia very well.
 * The amazing graphical design.


 * What I didn't like:
 * The dialog.
 * cannot be moved.
 * annoying when I want to view another page during a mission.
 * easy to close accidently, and I have to start over when this happens.
 * I have to make a dummy edit to continue if I save a page before prompted to save. It would be better if it disabled the save button before prompting to save.
 * Not all images seem to be suitable for the section where it's placed to.

How to find sources to cite.
 * What I wanted more of:

None.
 * What was unnecessary:

None.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Ctwabn (talk) 05:00, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--จริยาภรณ์ ก้อนกั้น (talk) 07:41, 28 August 2015 (UTC) I would like to understand this easier.

Feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--จารุวรรณ นาหมีด (talk) 12:42, 28 August 2015 (UTC) I want to see everyone understands. This survey

Feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--มนต์ตรา ไชยเลิศ (talk) 13:15, 28 August 2015 (UTC) I hope Wikipedia will be able to connect the world with interesting articles from around the world.

Feedback
... Using easy to understand language ...none ...Resolution of the recommendations should be more than this. ...Not, everything is desperately needed
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What I wanted more of:
 * What was unnecessary:

...The development of improved
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--มนต์ตรา ไชยเลิศ (talk) 09:37, 30 August 2015 (UTC) montra c.

Feedback
...Convenient, easy to understand
 * What I liked:

...no
 * What I didn't like:

...The tightening of the article
 * What I wanted more of:

...none
 * What was unnecessary:

...The language used to develop more easily understood.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--จารุวรรณ นาหมีด (talk) 02:07, 31 August 2015 (UTC)จารุวรรณ นาหมีด

Feedback
...easy to understand
 * What I liked:

...none
 * What I didn't like:

...Facilitate easy use
 * What I wanted more of:

...none
 * What was unnecessary:

...i love this
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--จริยาภรณ์ ก้อนกั้น (talk) 09:16, 31 August 2015 (UTC) จริยาภรณ์ ก้อนกั้น

Feedback
...
 * What I liked: The friendly environment. The space adventure style of the tutorial. The idea of emphasizing unbiased information.

...
 * What I didn't like: The repetition on some steps (when editing an article), although it may be useful to fix the process in the users mind.

...
 * What I wanted more of: A bit of information on how the users structure is and how the articles are procteted against biased information and vandalism (in order to prevent the pejorative interpretation of "anyone can edit Wikipedia").

...
 * What was unnecessary: -

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share: I didn't understand the mascot drawing, although it's a cool idea to have an astronaut helper :)

--Lightmachete (talk) 06:02, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...You might want to add, near the blue Start the Adventure button, a note that tablets and other small devices (I guess that means any mobile devices) are not supported. It took me a while to find that info and I almost sent feedback as if it were a bug. You may even want to include that this is why the blue button doesn't work when it's tapped on such a device.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Slinky Manatee (talk) 15:40, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

7 fact
Intelligents: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Celine juliet (talk • contribs) 08:23, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
... The adventure is informative and efficient.
 * What I liked:

... The prompt box sometimes blocked the Save Page button.
 * What I didn't like:

... none
 * What I wanted more of:

... Having to press play for each soundbite.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Arobinson42 (talk) 00:29, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 9 September 2015
Achraf tamtalini (talk) 21:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Nothing requested. Bazj (talk) 21:19, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Olly olly oxen free
i wanted to add something to the "olly olly oxen free" page. when i started this there was a reference to a german phase that was similar and was suggested to be the source. now that is reference is gone. i wanted to add that the phrase might have come from the french language. in french allez allez aux hommes is go go men (free) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgmcs (talk • contribs) 04:34, 11 September 2015 (UTC)


 * This isn't a good place to ask questions, as few editors are watching it. But you asked the same thing at the help desk a few days ago, and it was answered there. The answer has been archived at Help desk/Archives/2015 September 7. -- John of Reading (talk) 06:03, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Minor typo
At one point in mission 1, it asks you to click "Edit" while pointing to "Edit source" - the latter of which is the intended link. Test account (For use in trying out the new user experience) (talk) 09:37, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Couple points in mission 2 where you can hit "Save" on the talk page before hitting the forward arrow, which leads to a state that's not exactly intuitive to get out from - it won't register you saving a page if there's not a change made, so you have to dummy edit. An "I already did!" option to advance past this might help. Test account (For use in trying out the new user experience) (talk) 09:47, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
Thank you for TWA!

I have a couple questions: Does it clean up after itself once the tutorial is completed, for example, removing the pages it created like example/TWA, example/TWA/Earth etc? Or should I request them to be removed myself?

The second question is, how are we supposed to treat the "talk" pages - should editors delete the conversations once they are finished, or must we keep them intact even if they are not relevant anymore?

All the best. --FomenPeasant (talk) 18:59, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
... the "realness": I felt this had a real demo-feel, like this is what I will do around wikipedia!! ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...ho to edit, size, resize
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Friedninja (talk) 19:26, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Esinedcach (talk) 17:30, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

i wanted to cry

Feedback
It was fun and informative.
 * What I liked:

None
 * What I didn't like:

None
 * What I wanted more of:

None
 * What was unnecessary:

No
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--F-16 Viper (talk) 23:54, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked: Fun and intuitive

...
 * What I didn't like: Nothing really, easy to go through and learn

...
 * What I wanted more of: more complex editing like making charts and graphs

...
 * What was unnecessary: They all seemed necessary to me

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share: Please add a section on making charts and graphs

--Peruporfavor (talk) 10:03, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 8 October 2015
Yj000018 (talk) 07:05, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
Thanks for the adventure, it made Wikipedia seem less daunting.

There was a little glitch that confused me at first. After I answered each question correctly, the "Challenge yourself BELOW..." box did not disappear.

You've got a list of "Key pages covered in the Adventure" but it would be nice if, at the end of the adventure, there was a complete summary of all the things taught. That would assist long-term retention of our learning.

I don't think that more levels should be added, because the adventure becomes quite tedious after a while (I was glad it ended when it did). But there definitely needs to be a path forward, bridging the gap between these very simple activities and Wikipedia's numerous complicated policies. Perhaps after Wikipedians complete all seven levels, they can "graduate" to another tutorial that is more advanced with a little less guidance. 102 at 1625 (talk) 14:18, 8 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Something like this, but more interactive. 102 at 1625 (talk) 08:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
Very simple and straightforward way to learn syntax of editing articles
 * What I liked:

just a little buggy - I got lost at one point and it kind of reset or doubled the tutorial.
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing - perfect length
 * What I wanted more of:

It is a little dumbed down, even for a relative neophyte like me - but I understand it is for all
 * What was unnecessary:

Thanks - great way to feel more comfortable about diving in!
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--TotoroRules (talk) 00:23, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
... IT'S AWESOME! I LOVED IT. THE BEST PART IS IT WORKS ON MOBILE.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...MORE MISSIONS. TOO SHORT ...
 * What I wanted more of:
 * What was unnecessary:

... DO I KEEP MY BADGES?
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--SuperCofee (talk) 18:58, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
i like every mission, from those missions, now i know how to make an article well. becaus i just joinned
 * What I liked:

there's nothing i didn't like
 * What I didn't like:

i wanna more games, so i can raise my wiki-skilla
 * What I wanted more of:

everything is necessary
 * What was unnecessary:

the point is, i like this adventure
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Aul1112 (talk) 14:10, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
...the emphasis on consensus decisions ...the positive nature of corrections ...the methods used to protect against corrupted entries ...the clever use of a virtual entry to practice each step
 * What I liked:

...at times navigation was dicey ...an error message never took me to the place where an error had been made
 * What I didn't like:

...info on how to delete a message that an entry is inadequate....I found that confusing, although I repeated the step
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...I have a much greater appreciation of Wikipedia as a resource having taken this tutorial
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Ally Sun (talk) 00:45, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked: how I learned to use wikipedia

...
 * What I didn't like: Not acknowledging my personality

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share: I think you are controlling the freedom of my spirit with your knowledge learning

--Ronald Arjune 18:34, 2 November 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronald Arjune (talk • contribs)

Feedback
...Those 7 missions
 * What I liked:

...Nothing
 * What I didn't like:

...Creating tables
 * What I wanted more of:

...Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...This is better but can make best.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--SidhardhRamesh 08:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
The emphasis on adding and improving with less focus on policy and rules. It brings Wikipedia back to its roots of building a free encyclopedia containing all the world's knowledge. I think this is better for new users and hopefully they won't get bitten when they try to edit for real.
 * What I liked:

I have a list of things that I think can be improved upon, as a non-new editor I can see some mistakes that I think we should correct, I'm going to contact the project directly and I have to try to remember everything now. One of the biggest issues was the box randomly disappearing. Hitting the browser back button didn't make it reappear, and when I clicked TWA tab it said I was at the start of the mission again. I managed to find my way back without having to start over but I doubt very much a brand new person would be able to do that.
 * What I didn't like:

Real editing advice, such as the use of show preview and direction to try the sandbox.
 * What I wanted more of:

Asking that you repeat the same action over and over, such as doing ~7 section headings and same for inserting pictures, with the exact same steps. It makes Wikipedia seem tedious and surely people have figured it out after the first few. Also we weren't able to see the article with the added pictures! So new editors don't get to see the connection as strongly of how tedious work is worth it for the end result.
 * What was unnecessary:

Excellent idea, could use some improvements but definitely a great option that needs to be shared more often with new editors.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--LibertyOrDeath (talk) 06:39, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
Everything! I always had a feeling that editing Wikipedia is a difficult job, but the interactive tour made it fun and easy to learn!
 * What I liked:

I like everything.
 * What I didn't like:

How to use the templates and search for other useful things to make the editing fun?
 * What I wanted more of:

Lesson on adding images
 * What was unnecessary:

Nothing as of now. I can't wait to edit :)
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Isnowden (talk) 07:34, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
The easy navigation made me understand Wikipedia more.
 * What I liked:

It's too short! I want some more information!
 * What I didn't like:

Information! Some of those jokes.
 * What I wanted more of:
 * What was unnecessary:

Nothing! Well done!
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--or; 08:37, 5 December 2015 (UTC)Holy Spirit "Thanks for the warm welcome" — Preceding unsigned comment added by AAU-OMm (talk • contribs)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--or; 08:51, 5 December 2015 (UTC)Praise GOD, Holy Spirit — Preceding unsigned comment added by AAU-OMm (talk • contribs)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked:This tutorial was amazing and friendly and creative and I really loved it

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:More info about templates and formatting pages

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:thank you for making this

--Valik1234 (talk) 08:25, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
Sorry if I'm not putting this in the correct spot, but it keeps getting stuck on "mission" 1,5 & 7. Dixon H. (talk) 22:42, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
... The description of core policies ... Navigation was confusing at first ... Advice on interacting with other users ... Copy and pasting. I want to express myself! ... The images you insert into the earth article at the end don't seem to match up with the sections. Is that okay?
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What I wanted more of:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Isaac rowe1 (talk) 02:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
It taught me new things that I didn't know of, and showed me how to do things that I have had to figure out using other peoples edits.
 * What I liked:

Had one hiccup where I ha to repeat one thing multiple times. But I expect that was because I mad a mistake, but I wasn't sure.
 * What I didn't like:

Maybe add a more advanced section for those who want to know more than the basics.
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Put together really well. I think it is a great resource for getting new people, young and old, into editing Wikipedia, and making it a fun way of learning.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Lbmarshall (talk) 18:36, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked: The interface

...
 * What I didn't like: Copy pasting a lot of stuff

...
 * What I wanted more of: Editing tips

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share: Amazing experience!

--Themessier (talk) 22:09, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
It is easy to understand
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--UraNaKa (talk) 15:18, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
On a monitor in portrait orientation, I can't click the "Start the adventure" link if I put the cursor over the word "adventure". I'm using Windows 7 with IE11 with 101% zoom. Zian (talk) 05:45, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Zian! I believe one of the images at your particular size/zoom is overlapping the button. If you made your resolution higher or zoomed out just a bit I bet it would work. Could you try that and tell me? Even if that works, it's still a bug; unfortunately we haven't been able to get that image to behave on all varieties of screen views. Thanks and cheers, Jake Ocaasi (WMF) (talk) 19:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
It's very fun.
 * What I liked:

I was so lazy that I did not type all the words, I can't copy words in my computer, and 7 missions are too long.
 * What I didn't like:

Advanced Wikipedia Adventure.
 * What I wanted more of:

The first mission.
 * What was unnecessary:

Nah, just the things above. I am quite tired.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

333-blue 23:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked: That you can finish all the 'adventures' in under an hour!

...
 * What I didn't like: That there were no insturctions on if something went wrong

...
 * What I wanted more of: better insturctions on if something went wrong

...
 * What was unnecessary: The sounds at the ending.

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share: I think its awesome for new Wikipedia users

--Ilovebeaniebabies8804! (talk) 19:15, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked: The Badges, I absolutely loved the badges, the colors and all together the fact that we got badges.

...
 * What I didn't like: The ending, I would have loved more instructions at the end.

...
 * What I wanted more of: Badges

...
 * What was unnecessary: The ending options.

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share: I love this step by step instruction because it makes it easier for people to understand

--Savannah.wade.21 (talk) 06:56, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked: is that i can help others with information i now

...
 * What I didn't like: its kind of hard trying to be right

...
 * What I wanted more of: more practice

...
 * What was unnecessary:having to log on

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Sosak123 (talk) 19:44, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 7 March 2016
Qhall015 (talk) 03:07, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Empty request. — xaosflux  Talk 03:12, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 7 March 2016
CAM214 (talk) 06:18, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * ❌ - no request made -- John of Reading (talk) 06:59, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
The positive, constructive attitude. Actually performing the actions described. Hearing a bit - but not too much - about the rationale. Wide range of topics included. Attention paid to user and talk pages, which I for one didn't really look into before.
 * What I liked:

Not seeing anything about the sources described - we judged some as reliable without knowing them or looking them up. The pictures did not seem relevant to the sections the instructions said to add them to. Copying things from the talk page to the article felt a little forced - maybe a more natural example would be copying a relevant section from an existing article about a related subject?
 * What I didn't like:

How to decide what is relevant to an article? What changes should be discussed before doing them (if any)? What is good etiquette to put on someone's talk page (if anything)? Is there any way to match my interests, skills, and knowledge to what needs improvement? What about an international pint of view? Which other tags should I be aware of, and when should I use them? I know that not all of this can fit in one Adventure, galactic as it may be.
 * What I wanted more of:

Repeated copying from the talk page to the main.
 * What was unnecessary:

Thank you so much for making this, your love for the project really shows. I've read Wikipedia for years and made some very minor edits in the past months, but now I feel a lot more capable of contributing.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Speakercontext (talk) 14:25, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
Taggy McTaggerstein
 * What I liked:

"All hail NPOV" -- the wording around the NPOV mission was a bit... imperial? I know Wikipedia values neutrality, but the tone of that particular section was not neutral!
 * What I didn't like:

Information on where to go to get more details about Wikipedia's formatting--I know I've seen help pages about this before, but it would be nice if they were linked from here.
 * What I wanted more of:

Excessive copy/pasting, particularly around image insertion. One image would do. Maybe two.
 * What was unnecessary:

Isn't the raw referencing done in this tutorial with ref tags discouraged? I have seen people "fixing" them with bots to be in this format: Which is available from the drop-down menu on the toolbar.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--M. A. Broussard (talk) 08:33, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked:
 * Lessons were easy to digest and very clear.

...
 * What I didn't like:
 * The demo could be a bit shorter. And there could be a minimise button so we can continue lessons after logging out.

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:
 * N.A.

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:
 * This was super helpful. Thank you so much!

--Fjasni (talk) 08:43, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Feedback

 * I really enjoyed the experience

...
 * What I liked:
 * The simplicity

...
 * What I didn't like:
 * The length

...
 * What I wanted more of:
 * REal practise, quizzes

...
 * What was unnecessary:
 * More quizzes

...Thankyou
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--DanielDan1973 (talk) 22:50, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...Thank you for this great adventure I learned a lot and I can edit my own article.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--16chseld 122 (talk) 23:16, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
The missions
 * What I liked:

Not as awesome as I expected. Maybe because I'm not a "new" editor?
 * What I didn't like:

More stuff
 * What I wanted more of:

I dunno
 * What was unnecessary:

This is awesome but needs better stuff. Again, because I'm not new here? I did this because I never did this.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Pachisu124 (talk) 21:34, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Quit?
How do I get rid of the TWA pop up messages like the Challenge yourself below message without starting over?

And do I start over if I log out?

--Pachisu124 (talk) 21:40, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, Pachisu124! To stop the popup messages, just click the [x] in the corner.  This does mean you lose your place, however you can rejoin at any mission by using the navigation menu.  So if you stopped mid-way through mission 3, you can just start over mission 3.  If you pay close attention to the url you were at, you can even start over at the exact step you were at in mission 3, for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:TWA/3/Start?tour=twa3&step=11.  Sorry the game isn't smarter than this.  There's no harm in duplicating a mission  It won't 'break' your progress, and you can still complete the game.  Cheers, Jake Ocaasi (WMF) (talk) 16:40, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked: How simple it was

...
 * What I didn't like:Too many missions

...
 * What I wanted more of:nothing

...
 * What was unnecessary:The things that I already had completed

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Gymlife (talk) 00:09, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
... I liked that I learned a lot! It was very helpful.
 * What I liked:

... too much copy/pasting! It was helpful sometimes, but other times I wanted to change the text and it wouldn't let me.
 * What I didn't like:

... I liked the choices they gave you. They were funny and also made you think.
 * What I wanted more of:

...The music. I didn't really listen to it.
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was a great Adventure!
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Elsa Enchanted (talk) 14:19, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 6 April 2016
Ablanco15 (talk) 01:36, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: Empty request —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 02:32, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked: I liked that the wikipedia adventure was very friendly and explained each step clearly and thoroughly.

...
 * What I didn't like: I don’t think there was anything I didn’t like about the adventure. It was very helpful

...
 * What I wanted more of: I wanted more of was connecting with other users

...
 * What was unnecessary: Nothing was unnecessary. Every step was needed to help a new user like me really learn more about being apart of the wikipedia world.

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share: I think this was a great way to really help new users become comfortable with starting their journey here on wikipedia

--Figueroa Lea (talk) 06:27, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked:the method of teaching new things

...
 * What I didn't like:it was a bit long

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Nandini Praveen (talk) 11:44, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked:Easy to understand, good introduction.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:having the quiz questions ( such as on npov) would be great. Helps to confirm that I learned something.

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Knbhall90 (talk) 20:35, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Feedback

 * What I liked:
 * As someone who edits Wikipedia as a hobby, I enjoyed going through this to see what's out there. It's great to have an interactive tutorial, though it's been fun to learn how to edit more or less on my own.


 * What I didn't like:
 * I didn't like how the popups would appear in other tabs, though (1) that's probably pretty difficult to avoid, and (2) someone new is likely not editing at the same time as going through this tutorial.


 * What I wanted more of:
 * I think it was a good length. Users can learn the basics, and learn more over time.


 * What was unnecessary:
 * Automatically adding badges to my userpage. I think it's neat, and I know I can just remove them. Either way, I would recommend changing the automatic edit summaries for that from "New Message (simulated automatically as part of The Wikipedia Adventure)" to "New Badge (simulated automatically as part of The Wikipedia Adventure)"


 * Any other thoughts you want to share:
 * I'd recommend creating User:Polarbearcats and others from the history of the Earth page. I like how e.g. User:GaiaGirl86's page looks.


 * Thanks for creating an AWESOME tutorial!

- Paul2520 (talk) 13:44, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
A very easy way to learn the basics of Wikipedia editing.
 * What I liked:

Slightly-easy to accidentally break the script. Stopping a lesson in-progress could cause some problems.
 * What I didn't like:

It would be nice to see a separate advanced version with more advance tips and lessons.
 * What I wanted more of:

Some of the formatting examples where a bit excessive.
 * What was unnecessary:

Overall a very nice little tutorial.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--ZettaComposer (talk) 17:35, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
... Is how friendly the guider is. ... It ended too fast. ... There's no option for that. I simply loved it.
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What I wanted more of:

... It simply helped you to understand how to edit and do other work of articles.
 * What was unnecessary:

... Marvelous!
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Amy2563 (talk) 09:50, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 24 May 2016
Amichaels64 (talk) 16:43, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Mlpearc  ( open channel ) 16:48, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked:

Mission 2 was confusing and a little glitchy (specifically with the bolding Earth part). It sent me on a loop of bolding Earth over and over again and I didn't get a badge for doing it.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Is there even a badge for bolding Earth?
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Zelda120! (talk) 23:09, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
I really enjoyed the step-by-step introduction. I feel ready and want to get started! It was amusing and fun to do.
 * What I liked:

I can't think of anything I didn't like
 * What I didn't like:

It was very helpful, so I can't think of anything else...
 * What I wanted more of:

Everything was necessary! ;-)
 * What was unnecessary:

Nope, awesome job guys!!
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Ttigel (talk) 13:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
Excellent tutorial! Really entertaining and educational, finished it in one sitting!
 * What I liked:

Nothing
 * What I didn't like:

And Advanced Mission Expansion would be great!
 * What I wanted more of:

It was just the right amount
 * What was unnecessary:

During the first mission when you update your User page, the messages just looped so I had to restart it. But after that I had no more problems.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

Great work, kudos!

--Arelarez (talk) 13:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
I had already reviewed most of the information present, but had no idea how to use the source editor. Now I feel comfortable using both the source and visual editor!
 * What I liked:

I had to restart because I hit the back button once on accident.
 * What I didn't like:

All the syntax! I think other users would appreciate if it incorporated how to use templates.
 * What I wanted more of:

It was all very relevant and necessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

Great work! I wish I had found this earlier on!
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Omnitaus (talk) 19:58, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked:

A couple of points for programming improvement/bugs: When you finish typing a suggested edit, I (by instinct) click the 'save edit' button, without clicking the blue 'next' button on the TWA narration box element. This saves it, but leads to complications with the TWA narration. (If it isn't clear what I mean, please let me know). It should be pretty easy to program in some cases to deal with this. I'm sure I'm not the only one who's had this problem.
 * What I didn't like:

During the first couple of sections, I was trying to search other Wikipedia pages at the same time to clarify things I was reading etc., and the box kept coming up in the centre of the page and distracting the view.

Tags. I don't understand them. How do you tag a wiki page as being badly referenced? Badly formatted? Bad grammar? (is this all tags are used for?)
 * What I wanted more of:

So many badges. It's nice to get a sense of achievement, but I thought it was a bit (LOT) overboard.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Odcameron (talk) 04:17, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Updating numbers?
Just started going through this to evaluate whether we can encourage our new contributors to start here. Noted that Mission 1 has Wikipedia's age listed as 10 years old (could we update it to say when it started instead of trying to keep up with its age? Also, number of views per minute etc? Thanks! This is very cool to find so thanks to all the people who've made this possible!! DrMel (talk) 20:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I think this may be something you will need to do, as I can't edit those pages? -- samtar talk or stalk 07:20, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅., you could apply for template-editor userrights so you can make those changes in the future if you want.  Thanks for the tip !

Loved the Wesnoth music!
I really like Battle for Wesnoth, so the music was a nice touch! NightlyG (talk) 08:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Feeling the Love
20:14, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
... It was quite interactive.
 * What I liked:

... Number of badges wasn't enough.
 * What I didn't like:

... It could've been more personalized!
 * What I wanted more of:

... Nothing.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

20:14, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

This was super helpful.. Thank you!
20:14, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks
20:14, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
I liked the tone of the language and that it covered the basics of editing. I liked the colors and the character that came along and it went very smoothly. I love that it gives badges. I liked the realistic conversations and the conversation options.
 * What I liked:

No section going through the more modern editor. The conversation options seemed a little obvious choice-wise.
 * What I didn't like:

Looking at the other features like bullet lists.
 * What I wanted more of:

I thought it was very concise, nothing unnecessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

Very good tool to learn, I wish I had this when I was just starting to edit Wikipedia. Found it by accident and I already knew most of these things but it was good to learn more. Very nice.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--TheMusicGirl (talk) 04:27, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 23 June 2016
Fixed 5 typos

Sj236 (talk) 20:49, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Done. It wasn't on this page. — Andy W.  ( talk  · ctb) 20:54, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * They are intentional as part of the TWA process. — Andy W.  ( talk  · ctb) 21:05, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked: Slow and steady

...
 * What I didn't like:Nothing like that

...
 * What I wanted more of: Practice

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Sharma117 (talk) 11:33, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
I liked how the game itself gave me a sense of achievement. In each mission, I was taught methods that I will definitely use. I also liked the fun little character that guided me along the way. Those badges were a fun little extra, too!
 * What I liked:

I liked the full experience.
 * What I didn't like:

Perhaps a lesson on file size? In the final mission (no. 7), when you are adding the images to the "Earth" article, it would be nice if there was a tutorial on the correct file sizes for articles.
 * What I wanted more of:

Nothing.
 * What was unnecessary:

I've been editing with MediaWiki for a few years now, being more experienced in editing on Wikia. I'm fully aware that Wikia and Wikipedia are two different communities, but thanks to this game, I was able to learn much more about editing on Wikipedia, and now I feel brave enough to make important and more advanced edits on the website.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--BarrierBuilder (talk) 20:39, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
...Creative
 * What I liked:

...Too lenghty
 * What I didn't like:

...Less content
 * What I wanted more of:

...Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...No
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Monalisa.sinha93 (talk) 09:00, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Given the feedback

 * Thanks a lot. It's an excellent method of teaching the procedures--Njezhungan.shaiju.cmi (talk) 05:18, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Njezhungan.shaiju.cmi (talk) 05:18, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Feedback

 * What I liked: 4 hours to do Mission 1, 2, and 3. Three times. But So Discouraged, I came back and sure enough - the 'twinkler' {my name for the tutor} came back with very wonderful suggestions "After" playing lovely music for me.  I. Earned. Three. Badges.  As I'm a story teller and writer - (not a journalist) I "love this place" & hope to be a good 'tightener'  'cleaner'  & who knows... maybe I'll meet a translator for my books.  I am encouraged. I was so scared in 2012 when I went into my "sandbox" - but the user-friendly that's here now.  Wow.  10++  Really.  I'm famous for saying, "No wrong things on purpose- even if I have to put my head on my knees & just breathe... "  Really proud of your interaction and 'user friendly' signs posted e-v-e-r-w-h-e-r-e.  Important.  You're a vital resource for me- and there's nothing I'd ever do to cause harm.  (If I screw up?  I didn't mean to.)

...
 * What I didn't like: I miss Adobe graphic point & click and graphics - but... "this" as I've called you forever "My Wiki PEEPS!" - is my lifesaver so I truly intend on returning the favor - {just not a journalist] [expansive writer]  [so... I'll find my place but at this 'pace' it'll be quite some time before "I write for the Real Deal."

...
 * What I wanted more of: It's been some time since I've gotten to "play" working to learn - I see deletions, I see angst, and ego... I sense war of the words - Eventually- (if I survive & grow) my goal {ultimately} would be to help quell this. Meouch.

...
 * What was unnecessary: oooooo - how would I possible know.  But I will keep feeling my way through it.  I have enormous admiration about your "stepped up"  patrols - I'd "PDF" print "gobs" & email them to myself, just to have an article (writer's research) to pull from as the edits are subtle but falling like reign-rain. O= Grr. Planetkimsmith (talk) 10:22, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share: **LOTS TO LEARN - THANK YOU!!** && the 'font' is hard for me to see - Sure would be nice if the default build-font was a bit thicker.

--Planetkimsmith (talk) 10:22, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
the simplicity and interesting flow of adventure. Also the badges are very cool
 * What I liked:

nothing
 * What I didn't liked:

i think thats enough for a new editor
 * What I wanted more of:

nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

Its the best. Just try to put adventure for diffrent regional languages
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Ameyawiki (talk) 18:35, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
...everything
 * What I liked:

...I wrote in my talk page but the guide don't told me to save it so I have to write it again.
 * What I didn't like:

...I wanted more levels
 * What I wanted more of:

...nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...I liked it very much. Now I would be able to write my own article ! Susmitauri (talk) 09:58, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Any other thoughts you want to share: It was really cool

--Susmitauri (talk) 09:58, 12 August 2016 (UTC) 19:22, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
...It was great
 * What I liked:

...number of badges not enough
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Whistle knvfhnvssdyu (talk) 12:34, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
very easy to follow; logical sequence ...
 * What I liked:

a very good introduction and not intimidating for begginers ...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Iredred (talk) 20:50, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
Nice set of tasks.
 * What I liked:

Constant error in the "Click EDIT SOURCE" instructions was annoying... Should be "Click edit this page"
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Instructions for adding a page to Watchlist (click star in top center) was unclear. I saw/see no star. Maybe a browser issue (used Chrome)?
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--RobP (talk) 00:32, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked:the memes

...
 * What I didn't like:the non-dank memes

...
 * What I wanted more of:harambe jokes

...
 * What was unnecessary: 360º noscope wallbangers

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:this is a joke lol

--2601:681:4C02:622A:3120:F0D4:5765:C553 (talk) 01:18, 31 August 2016 (UTC)Memeinator

How do u sign up on bookclub — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charile walker (talk • contribs) 00:25, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
...Wikipedia in a nutshell
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...Thanks!
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Jccoelho99 (talk) 02:41, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
...This is a great way to learn how to use Wikipedia. Interactive tutorials are awesome.
 * What I liked:

...It said I couldn't leave. It would be nice if it could be bookmarked.
 * What I didn't like:

...The instructions seemed fine, I can't think of anything to add.
 * What I wanted more of:

...I liked it the way it was.
 * What was unnecessary:

...Put it on a new user's profile. I didn't see it there. I forget how I found it.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--DonnaST (talk) 22:26, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

I need help editing pages please

Cheekaboo101 (talk) 21:59, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
I like the way the game encourages the editors to keep calm and polite, even when they are frustrated from the reviewers attitude to their work.
 * What I liked:

1. The tutorial is a bit too tedious. 2. The transition between missions is ambiguous, mainly at the end of missions 3. I learn about this tutorial too late, only after I wasted much time learning the rules by trial and error.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

it would be better if the tutorial is integrated in the normal editing. For example, when I edit the user page, the first option should be to do it according to the tutorial.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Avi Harel (talk) 13:25, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
The availability of a helpful source on at any time of need and very caring...
 * What I liked:

Honestly nothing I can say towards this question...
 * What I didn't like:

Knowledge of the unknown ...
 * What I wanted more of:

Knowledge of the unknown, to solve the wanted...
 * What was unnecessary:

To the dreamer, and explores the travel with imagination...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--HelloWorld* (talk) 10:33, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Feedback from Kingstevenrules

 * What I liked:
 * I liked the learning process that TWA uses. Very nice, very effective. The Awards were a nice boost, too.


 * What I didn't like:
 * I saw a bug on Mission 5 where the Challenge Yourself box was fixed in location on the screen. By this, I mean that the box would move as you scrolled.


 * What I wanted more of:
 * More Missions!


 * What was unnecessary:
 * The bugs. But, they happen, so I don't have much control over them not happening.


 * Any other thoughts you want to share:
 * All in all, a very good game, very fun and creative. 8.5/10.

--Kingstevenrules (talk) 19:46, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Feedback from Prahlad balaji

 * What I liked:
 * I got awards.


 * What I didn't like:
 * They kept repeating the same text all over again when I was trying to do the mission again. They should have saved the text from the past missions and deleted the text from the mission I was on and make me repeat that same text.


 * What I wanted more of:
 * More missions!


 * What was unnecessary:
 * Repeating the text when I wanted to do the mission all over again

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Prahlad balaji (talk) 14:51, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
...its details
 * What I liked:

...too complicated
 * What I didn't like:

...easy explanation
 * What I wanted more of:

...N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

...N/A
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Pat921221 (talk) 07:05, 29 September 2016 (UTC)q

Feedback

 * What I liked:

It's a new and learning experience ...

N/A ...
 * What I didn't like:

More capability to edit ...
 * What I wanted more of:

N/A ...
 * What was unnecessary:

N/a
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

Lm0630 (talk) ...

--Lm0630 (talk) 08:36, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
... ````it is free and does not charge like wordpress there are no advertisement
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

it is horrible complex and people just mark your content for deletion, without even reading content, they don't even understand your content. it is horrible.

... a chat window for 1-2-1 chat to understand the problem with people who marked my content for deletion
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

a communication ... make it interactive, else i will for sure goto wordpress, i m loosing out my patience
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Karansingh47 (talk) 16:39, 7 October 2016 (UTC)