Wikipedia talk:TWA/Portal/Archive 6

Feedback
... I liked the badges that it made. I even put them in a special section in my user page!
 * What I liked:

... I didn't like that when you edited, you had to manually change to the next adventure.
 * What I didn't like:

... The badges. Seriously.
 * What I wanted more of:

... The bar count.
 * What was unnecessary:

... Nah.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

-- 3125ATalk!Contributions! 20:28, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Feedback

 * My greatest joy is learning about referencing, can i use this training to create a page in Igbo Wikipidia?
 * I also love the barges. --Oby Ezeilo (talk) 15:49, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
Every instruction is very clear and useful. ...
 * What I liked:

The word is too small for reading. ...
 * What I didn't like:

More games include in the adventure. ...
 * What I wanted more of:

I think everything is very good and important. ...
 * What was unnecessary:

This adventure let me know more about how to use the WIkipedia. ...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--20chseld416 (talk) 01:45, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

When it comes to adding images, we need to be able to add the alt tag and make it mandatory. This would comply with ADA.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Galendalia CVU Member \ Chat Me Up 19:38, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
The applause at the end of each mission made me smile on the inside.
 * What I liked:

If the editing features were more user friendly and didn't show the coding portions of the text, it would make it more appealing, however, I still plan on contributing and editing if I find something that doesn't match with my background of research in Nutrition and Exercise.
 * What I didn't like:

A video guided presentation of using wikipedia could be a nice addition. Same as above. Showing the coding portion in the texts. That can be eliminated. Not all of us are coders but it sure is fascinating to learn about.
 * What I wanted more of:
 * What was unnecessary:

Thank you for all that Wiki gives to the world. It truly makes the world a more defined place to actually have access with the click of a button to all of its glory.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Linus Godwin korah (talk) 06:42, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
This was a fun, friendly game, perfect for introducing new editors too. I liked the "space adventure" theme and how it highlights the two most important things when it comes to articles: Neutrality and Verification.
 * What I liked:

There wasn't much I had to bother with, except for modifying my userpage in a way I didn't like.
 * What I didn't like:

Could there be a section on reverting edits like vandalism and warning users? There's plenty of that here, so it could be useful for new editors. Also some mention of protected pages could be welcomed, as well as finding images and sources (don't always expect for another user to find them).
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

How did you make this game? I would like to try that at some point.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

-- 15:21, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Can't it work
Can't it work on phone Tbiw (talk) 19:20, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked: Nice info i get some ideas

...
 * What I didn't like:no comments

...
 * What I wanted more of: please include more about the relationships about the user and the content

...
 * What was unnecessary:no comments

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Prakashkalisamy (talk) 08:55, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
The way the game is fixed for newbies.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

More stages !
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

No, but this is really awesome ;D
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Rebecca💙 (talk) 12:21, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
Everything here!
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

No comments
 * What was unnecessary:

No, everything is great!
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Sashatrk (talk) 06:54, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked:The game was fun and covers all the basic things that a new editor needs to know.

...
 * What I didn't like:The box sometimes covers up the editing space and I can't edit very well.

...
 * What I wanted more of:The game doesn't have a part about counter vandalism.

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

-- CompassOwl  (talk to me!)  23:50, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Can't do it due to overlapping windows
Hi, I think the adventure is a great idea. But it does not work on my laptop, since the boxes with instructions are overlapping the edit window. So I cannot do what I am asked for, e.g. edit my user page, since the publish changes window is hidden behind the adventure window and I cannot move them. Any ideas how to fix this? Regards,--Ichdunich (talk) 12:22, 23 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi Ichdunich et al.! I experienced exactly the same issue. I didn't want to close the popup, because I'd been told exactly not to do that, but that meant I had to 'blindly' edit some stuff. Douginamug (talk) 13:50, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, Douginamug can you tell me more about this. In which screen this was happened. To go pass through what you had done? --Ranjithsiji (talk) 18:10, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Hey Ranjithsiji, In this screenshot, I have reached the edit page for one of the missions, and despite the cursor being active in the edit box and typing, the popup remains. As I said, I didn't want to close it. However, I just now realize that I activated the New Wikitext Mode beta feature in my preferences—perhaps this was the problem? I'm going to disable and check now Douginamug (talk) 18:17, 2 August 2020 (UTC) Screenshot from 2020-08-02 20-12-19.png
 * Ranjithsiji, with the beta feature turned off, everything worked without issues! Thanks, good tool. Douginamug (talk) 20:43, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Douginamug In my homewiki We are planning to upgrade the script with visual editor and on mobile interface. Because this is a great tool for new comers. So I will keep you posted if something really good happens. --Ranjithsiji (talk) 18:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
The smooth process of orientation
 * What I liked:

Nothing really
 * What I didn't like:

How to create special pages from start to finish (from the scratch)
 * What I wanted more of:

Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

I am so excited on this journey
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--LaDinky (talk) 18:44, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Feedback

 * What I liked:
 * Honestly, i really liked how it showed basic editing but did not go too deep into complex usage which would've made it super tedious.


 * What I didn't like:
 * The pop up was too low and i had to keep scrolling all the time, and it became mildly irritating.


 * What I wanted more of:
 * Referencing! It was not clear enough. The protocol for adding sources, if we should add dated or web archives was not explained.


 * What was unnecessary:
 * Making us add images eight times in a row. Definitely not needed.

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Tazik04 (talk) 04:08, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked: I liked how easy it is to find things

...
 * What I didn't like: I did not have anything i did not like

...
 * What I wanted more of: I wanted more guidance like how it was when i first started the tutorial

...
 * What was unnecessary: Nothing was unnecessary everything was informational.

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share: I never knew Wikipedia was like this, it is interesting to use.

--Taeeees (talk) 22:31, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
Learning.
 * What I liked:

The issues... (more on that)
 * What I didn't like:

Ease of use.
 * What I wanted more of:

Non of it
 * What was unnecessary:

I found that after you see the sign "click 'edit' button" and you click it, the instructions disappear. I reloaded the page each time, which worked until the 7th mission, where it it didn't work at all, so I never finished it in the end.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--User:Shadowblade08 (talk) 21:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked: la forma práctica de mostrarlo todo

...
 * What I didn't like: nada

...
 * What I wanted more of: seguir practicando con ejemplos

...
 * What was unnecessary: nada

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share: me ha parecido una muy buena introducción al funcionamiento del gran mundo de Wikipedia

--DianaLCa (talk) 14:50, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
... It was really fun and friendly, especially the sound effects. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... I just really like the little music clip things.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--314WPlay (talk) 17:20, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
...very user friendly and not boring
 * What I liked:

...sometimes when i would publish a change it would take me back to the start and tell me to publish something i already did.
 * What I didn't like:

... more time dedicated to verifiability
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... thank u
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--SleepyAthena (talk) 20:03, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

My feedback
I like what I learned in the first mission. Wikipedia helps you build up your writing skills. It helps me win competitions in writing. Thank you all — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikola Tesla edit (talk • contribs) 13:10, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
...hands on approach
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Toa eolas (talk) 14:05, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Help!!!!
Greetings. I've just new here and some how i can't check my stats Bdetfehigj (talk) 03:30, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi Bdetfehigj (talk), I like to use the User Analysis Tool, and then type in Username. After you click Submit, it will generate your edit count. I hope that helps! You can also ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Cheers, SunnyBoi (talk) 11:47, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
...I really enjoyed the program! Thank you
 * What I liked:

...I kept getting stuck in a loop at mission 7 and could not progress. I also seemed to skip some competencies and it was tricky to work out which ones they were.
 * What I didn't like:

--SunnyBoi (talk) 08:44, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
I thought this was a great introduction to most features and guidelines for Wikipedia! I'm glad it guides you to so many different pages. On level 6, step 9, when you are notified that you didn't cite your sources, I never actually saw the notification tag, just the normal wiki page and the tutorial window saying:
 * What I liked:
 * Potential Bug

What's that thing? That...CLEANUP TAG...doesn't look so good. Let's check out the talk page to see what it means.

I'm playing on Firefox if that makes a difference. --Hobbitina (talk) 20:17, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I just got to step 17 of the same level and there was no tag to delete, so maybe that is related? --Hobbitina (talk) 20:22, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked: It helped stuff.

...
 * What I didn't like: It was completely broken.

...
 * What I wanted more of:It getting fixed.

...
 * What was unnecessary:It not being fixed

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:I have stated the bug I've encountered and I've been given solutions to try and fix it but they haven't fixed it and there seems to be no mention of the bug getting fixed.

--Blaze Wolf &#38;#124 Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 16:05, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
I loved the way the whole features of Wikipedia were explained in a fun, interactive way. I really enjoyed learning about Wikipedia with such an innovative game.
 * What I liked:

There's nothing wrong with this. Keep up the good work!
 * What I didn't like:

I would have liked if more policies were discussed. I have seen that Wikimedia has many policies, but only a few were discussed.
 * What I wanted more of:

I didn't find anything unnecessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

No, sorry! But anyway, it was amazing!
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Albern Hill (talk) 11:47, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
It was clear, concise and wasn't to rushed.
 * What I liked:

I personally think that it used the buttons a lot. Mayby you guys can make a... Wiki Adventure TWO!.
 * What I didn't like:

The typeing, and maybe more interaction with real wiki users. Maybe you can have a vandal that we have to reply to, or fix the mistakes of?
 * What I wanted more of:
 * What was unnecessary:

Well... Ummmm... I can't think so. It was an amazing game!. (I want to be constructive, and also have some constructive criticism, but now I don't :|.)

You could add another extra mission, and make it so that the user has to type more? That's all for now.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--lightstreame (talk) 00:08, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
it was nice, and kinda useful &#58;)
 * What I liked:

it didn't explore some topics that probably would've been useful to know, such as templates and how you can do this.
 * What I didn't like:

Also, the fact it didn't explore the citation tool was kinda disappointing &#58;/

Maybe a second one, exploring more advanced topics
 * What I wanted more of:

absolutely nothing. everything was necessary to being a good editor
 * What was unnecessary:

&#58;)
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--JMVR1 (Communicate) (Validate my actions (for my ego, ofc)) (Email me) &#58;) 05:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
Apparently the statement in the seventh section is wrong: "... Then click to (image button) on the top left of the toolbar that looks like a tree in the sunset."

--Ahmetlii (talk) 20:51, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
Fun interface, loved that the language wasn't condescending
 * What I liked:

I liked it all
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

I'd love to see a chapter 2 or advanced mission kind of thing - although I don't know what that would entail.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--MmeCorbeau (talk) 00:12, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
It was fun, interactive and quick. HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 19:31, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * What I liked:

It was kind of long for a more experienced Wikipedian.HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 19:31, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * What I didn't like:

A more experienced wikipedian version
 * What I wanted more of:

Four out of five.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 19:31, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

It's not working
I hit start it shows some links I hit mission 1 and nothing happens. Ex-Borg Seven of Nine (talk) 21:20, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

A riddle to cheer you up!
I ponder a riddle for the few with clue, how do we know what on Wikipedia is true? --Gioguch (talk) 22:08, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * You use other fact-checking sources!!Mighty-osity (talk) 22:33, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
It's a nice paced tutorial to start editing in Wikipedia.
 * What I liked:

Sometimes the pop-up messages didn't appear, specially when editing the contents of a page. I had to click "View history" and then they appear.
 * What I didn't like:

I think it was a complete tutorial.
 * What I wanted more of:

Dividing the tutorial in so many parts might seem unnecessary. Combining some parts of the tutorial into the same "Section" could be nicer.
 * What was unnecessary:

Thanks for creating this! Makes the learning process way more approachable.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Palozano (talk) 22:33, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
Friendly NPCs, easy instructions
 * What I liked:

Did not show the visual editor Visual editor Nothing Nothing
 * What I didn't like:
 * What I wanted more of:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--DragonCia (talk) 14:30, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
I loved how simple and easy to use the interface was, and how well the whole process was explained, especially since it was editing using source editing, rather than visual edits.
 * What I liked:

How you couldn't really step away from any of the modules without starting over. I got busy in the middle of module 7 and had to start it over. It wasn't a horribly bad thing, but it would have been nice to pick up where I left off.
 * What I didn't like:

More information on proper sourcing, vandalism, and other policies.
 * What I wanted more of:

Nothing really. If anything, in my humble opinion, I think the program could be bigger.
 * What was unnecessary:

Loved this, and would recommend it to any new editors!
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Kalariwarrior (talk) 02:17, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked: the ease of the program

...
 * What I didn't like: it got stuck after mission 1 where I was posting to my about page and I couldn't figure out how to move on until I went back to the beginning and clicked on mission 2 manually

...
 * What I wanted more of: not sure

...
 * What was unnecessary: not sure

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share: nope

--Lklitz (talk) 16:27, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
It was AWESOME!!!
 * What I liked:

Just my two cents. The Wikipedia logo inside the adventure should maybe be a vector graphic.
 * What I didn't like:

Maybe removing vandalism would be fun. But it is fine so far! Also, File%3AInfyuthsion_-_Lost_In_Space.ogg should be the background music for the adventure. But it can be done manually anyway. Maybe it should be opened in a new tab automatically.
 * What I wanted more of:

Also, I just discovered the Cite feature (RefToolbar). It should be introduced as well! Very useful! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roku44 (talk • contribs) 07:58, 23 January 2021 (UTC) Nothing I can think of so far.
 * What was unnecessary:

I will add it, if it comes to my mind.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Roku44 (talk) 07:48, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
It gave me time to have a fun.
 * What I liked:

Not much interactive and fun activities!
 * What I didn't like:

Any vandalism patrol would be warranted.
 * What I wanted more of:

There is nothing.
 * What was unnecessary:

It was quite a time since TWA was launched in 2013.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

-- Mario Jump  83!  13:02, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
I liked the simulation aspect of the adventure most, it made it all seem so real.
 * What I liked:

I liked all of it!
 * What I didn't like:

I wanted more clarity with some of the instructions.
 * What I wanted more of:

Nothing was unnecessary in my opinion.
 * What was unnecessary:

No, I have nothing else to add.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Filmlover12 (talk) 13:26, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
It's simple to follow.
 * What I liked:

It might have been too simple in some parts.
 * What I didn't like:

More information about basic policies and maybe more information about formatting citations for newcomers. At the very least, something more to point us in the right direction to learn more.
 * What I wanted more of:

Nothing, really.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Primium (talk) 22:41, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

I found a few problems.
class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding unsigned comment added by Digi-ark (talk • contribs) 13:01, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * it is not detecting when the user opens the source editor
 * sometimes, I'd like to few the tips screen while editing a page, but I end up having to close it because it's in the way. That is a bit disorienting. <span
 * The source editor is not detecting when I complete a excercise --Mashedpotatoes52

Feedback
Broke everything into nicely-sized pieces, so that users weren't presented with a wall of instructive text. I also like how tactfully this approached topics like vandalism, emotion and bias. It's easy for discussion on those topics to get derailed. Overall I found it very effective and hit just the right tone.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

During image editing, users should be told about alt tags and ideally provided alt text to insert. To support web accessibility, the habit should be started early to always include an alt tag with every image added to the web, unless the image is ornamental.
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Thanks for assembling this tutorial!
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Bibliotreka (talk) 23:07, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Helpsak (talk) 02:07, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
Great introduction for newbies. I enjoyed the gamification. Mix of tasks and multiple choice questions...
 * What I liked:

I couldn't complete one of the tasks, I think it was removing a tag in Mission 6, I got stuck in a loop and couldn't progress...
 * What I didn't like:

Thanks for the introduction to Wikipedia, it was great fun! Very informative!
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Thermalengineering (talk) 12:25, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
User interface is well designed and the journey was quite insightful.
 * What I liked:

The processing was slow in the mission regarding section headings.
 * What I didn't like:

Every mission should be accomplished before moving to the next one.
 * What I wanted more of:

I can't point out anything.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Black~Gema (talk) 18:26, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
It's a really useful training game for new Wikipedians.
 * What I liked:

In Mission 2 or 3, I made a mistake and closed the entire browser.
 * What I didn't like:

Learning Babel boxes (I learned that in Commons.)
 * What I wanted more of:

Nothing really...
 * What was unnecessary:

It's really useful!
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--EditJuice (talk) 17:06, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
This was a good refresher, even for intermediate editors, loved the interface. Unfortunately, hitting the "back" button creates something of a mess (see User talk:EpicPupper/TWA, I would love for a note to be added warning of hitting the "back" button. None!
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What I wanted more of:

None!
 * What was unnecessary:

Thanks for making this! I might lurk around TWA and try to contribute a bit more in the future.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--EpicPupper 21:09, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 16 April 2021
The page TWA/2/Gaia (whose talkpage redirects here) has a Lint error because it contains an unbalanced bold tag. It is in line number 5 where there is an invalid  after. The  should be removed. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 09:36, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done hihi, this will probably be a bit confusing for anyone else coming to this page from TWA Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 12:22, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
Everything! This was so much fun and a great, interesting introduction to wikipedia.
 * What I liked:

If you hit the back button, there is no way to return to your previous position without doing the activities again...maybe a warning can be added about this?
 * What I didn't like:

More information about actually finding and sourcing references.
 * What I wanted more of:

Nothing; everything was great.
 * What was unnecessary:

Really enjoyed this. Really enjoyed the characters, background design could be changed to format better but it was fine and wasn't too distracting.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Happily888 (talk) 07:36, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
The humor, the rewards and the little pieces of music here and there that makes one want to carry on!
 * What I liked:

It pollutes the contribution history; I don't know if that's avoidable though.
 * What I didn't like:

It was nice overall. I didn't have many issues aside from a popups partially blocking buttons that I needed to click to progress in the game sometimes (this might be due to the fact that I use the Timeless skin). I think that the game should be more prominently featured in the website to reach the target audience (which is beginning Wikipedians I presume); in my case, I stumbled upon this game by accident.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Kzkzb (talk) 00:05, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
This was great!
 * What I liked:How short it aws

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--StarshipSLS (talk) 17:29, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
I really liked the overall idea and concept of the tutorial-esque minigame.
 * What I liked:

This is probably just me but, I personally wanted to have the option of skipping some of the steps. Several times it was bugged on a certain place when I realized it was because I was going too fast and skipping ahead. For example, when publishing, if you didn't click the next step, where the next step would tell you to publish it, it would not make it count as you doing it, and when clicking the 'next' you would then realize that you messed up by not clicking it first and then publishing.
 * What I didn't like:

Maybe more information on wiki policies/rules/guidelines? Give the user a quick rundown of important WP articles ie. WP:NPOV, WP:N, and WP:SOURCE just to name a few. (I understand NPOV was addressed but maybe add a little more information)
 * What I wanted more of:

Nothing was "unneccesary" all of that was pretty much something an editor starting out would need.
 * What was unnecessary:

For some reason I somehow missed this entire thing when I was first starting to edit. Would have probably used this tutorial a year ago if I found it.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--LucasA04 (talk) 02:46, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
Gostei de ver o resultado depois de inserir dados.
 * What I liked:

Não gostei da página ser apresentada em inglês
 * What I didn't like:

Nada
 * What I wanted more of:

Penso que os passos estão corretos
 * What was unnecessary:

nada
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Paraoinfinito (talk) 21:17, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
... The Wikipedia Adventure helped me learn a lot about Wikipedia
 * What I liked:

...when I finish a mission, there’s no button to put me back to the main page (where all the missions are).
 * What I didn't like:

...add more missions to make it more exciting
 * What I wanted more of:

...nothing ... Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Slade Reincarnation (talk) 20:02, 18 May 2021 (UTC)User:Slade Reincarnation

Feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...: Pc don´t work well!:(Mili63 (talk) 22:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * What I didn't like:

... :Portuguese linguage!Mili63 (talk) 22:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...: Too much for my pupils!!Mili63 (talk) 22:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Mili63 (talk) 22:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC) "Eu adoraria ajudar". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fafum (talk • contribs) 15:31, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
It was very easy to learn and it was helpful
 * What I liked:

On the last part, the images. I couldn’t upload so I had to do it manually without the thing.
 * What I didn't like:

I don’t know
 * What I wanted more of:

The image thing
 * What was unnecessary:

No more thoughts
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Josh cant edit at all (talk) 20:47, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
The badges were a nice touch. The ui makes it fun to use.
 * What I liked:

The fact that if you already made a user page, you can't progress past stage 1. It is very annoying knowing that on my main account I will never be able to finish TWA. Another thing, sometimes you need to make a certain edit or edit summary but anything will work. Make it so you have to edit what is told.
 * What I didn't like:

Everything
 * What I wanted more of:

The badges. They didn't feel like they were worth anything. On my new test account I got within 2 badges a minute it feels like.
 * What was unnecessary:

Just sometimes how you get stuck on something if you have already done it is so annoying.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

-- TigerScientist Chat > contribs 21:22, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
All
 * What I liked:

The inicial "understanding".
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

Thanks for the time for this spetacular work !!!!!
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Christycris (talk) 22:58, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
...I liked the order and structure. It is very useful to get a simple and clear introduction to such a daunting thing.
 * What I liked:

...I wish it would have been clearer and easier to navigate through. I was doing the tutorial and then I'd be done with a step and not know how to get back on track. I was lucky to kind of blunder back on it by going to the beginning again. Also the final step is very vague. We are asked to create sections on the Earth page but we aren't told how to do it. The answer is also not at all straight forward. It took me a very long time to figure out that this is done by changing the intro sentences to each paragraph to "heading" font.
 * What I didn't like:

...More of a sense of progress through steps A B C D etc. leading to a goal. As is each step kind of seems out of context or random.
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Kingfisher Seeker (talk) 18:05, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
It's almost turned all the keys of my brain! Thanks a lot for such generous help.
 * What I liked:

I didn't get some badges! I don't know why. But that was fun.
 * What I didn't like:

Thanks again for saving me from this ocean of knowledge. Let's hope for the best!
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

Muhammad Shafayet Hossain (talk) 16:40, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

My feedback
On Level 6, whenever I finish adding the edit and the edit summary. It makes my edit another summary, then when I add the summary again. It asks me to put one, again!

Please fix this. Thank you. Victoriacrownedpigeon1234 (talk) 10:25, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

feedback
pretty much everything
 * What I liked:

once you get into a mission, there’s like no way out unless you keep clicking the undo button back
 * What I didn't like:

more missions and better explanations
 * What I wanted more of:

none
 * What was unnecessary:

none
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

-- Protocode (talk) 21:21, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
It's a fun introduction for new editors to learn how the wiki works!
 * What I liked:

When you do the same mission more than once, the templates start to duplicate, leading to a... well, questionable experience.
 * What I didn't like:

Maybe some more stuff on policies? Not really sure.
 * What I wanted more of:

Seems fine to me!
 * What was unnecessary:

Seems fine to me!
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Vukky🌞 (talk • not a bot) 13:23, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
The theme of an Earth article in a galactic Wikipedia was very cute and engaging.
 * What I liked:

The interface felt very clunky.
 * What I didn't like:

An ability to skip past tedious skills I was already familiar with. Also, compatibility for users without the Visual Editor would have been convenient.
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

-- RFZYN SPY  talk 03:12, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
The theme of the adventure
 * What I liked:

Nothing
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing, this was very informative
 * What I wanted more of:

The alien theme, but it made the process less dull
 * What was unnecessary:

I learned how to author an article, that’s sort of neat
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--CVititoe (talk) 15:59, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
phylosofie and arts

Its a pleasure to participate in this experience.

...everthing
 * What I liked:

...nothing
 * What I didn't like:

information
 * What I wanted more of:

some facts
 * What was unnecessary:

hapinesse is a great thing
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Mpbrooke (talk) 21:47, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

I thought the Wikipedia Adventure was a great start to learn the little things of Wikipedia more easily.

Feedback
I loved the approach to make learning fun - it was such a good idea.
 * What I liked:

Not much; actually, not anything, apart from the weird looking blob, but I can live with that.
 * What I didn't like:

Maybe more learning and talk messages from other people. It’s nice to know that there’s life on Wikipedia.
 * What I wanted more of:

The badges. They are certainly nice things to have, but I think that they were a tiny bit over the top.
 * What was unnecessary:

Not really - only that I recommend this for people whwo are new to Wikipedia. It’s a brilliant intro!
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Mysterioso790 (talk) 19:28, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
The alien/space theme. An organized way to learn.
 * What I liked:

Should clarify how to add links and retain heading style. Should teach how to write descriptive alt text and why it’s important Should clarify that you must add the article content between the 3 closing divs, otherwise it will be mis-formatted alongside the rest of the page.
 * What I didn't like:

I would have liked to have written real edits and cited real sources so that my tutorial work actually helped wikipedia.
 * What I wanted more of:

When it said to click “insert” after adding the citation: I don’t think this was needed? I couldn’t find a button other than the dropdown, and it worked without it. The songs you could play at the end of each section
 * What was unnecessary:

I wasn't sure how to add a feedback section to this page, but I realized I needed to click "edit source" at the top instead of at the section headers. CBlanton (WMF) (talk) 23:42, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

Feedback
...
 * What I liked: It taught a lot of stuff that new editors need to know

...
 * What I didn't like: OH boy... first, if you have your preferences changed from the default then this is kinda useless because it tells you to use things like the image button which simply don't exist with the New Wikitext editor, second, the Teahouse is out of date in the Wikipedia Adventure and now looks much different, third, with anything that has to do with editing, I have to go to the URL and manually change  to go to the next step so I could actually advance. Also, the dude that tells you that you didn't add a reference somehow increases the article's size to 6 MILLION, which is way beyond what most articles size is. And he doesn't even add 6 million bytes to the article, he only adds a maintenance template saying that the article needs refs.

...
 * What I wanted more of: How to properly add references, currently afaik it only uses ref tags and not the actual template.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Other than the entire space theme (which I don't see how it fits into TWA) nothing

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share: My OS when I did TWA was Chrome OS using Google Chrome as the web browser.

--― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:57, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
... It's really great. I like editing and doing such thing.
 * What I liked:

... Nothing so far!
 * What I didn't like:

... More editssss
 * What I wanted more of:

... So many infos?
 * What was unnecessary:

... No thanks.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Freelancerdogukan (talk) 22:42, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
Everything!
 * What I liked:

Nothing
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing, I think it was informative enough
 * What I wanted more of:

Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

It was really fun and an effective tutorial for new users in Wikipedia
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Jolly1253 (talk) 10:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
nada
 * What I liked:

...tudo nada
 * What I didn't like:
 * What I wanted more of:
 * What was unnecessary:

tudo nada
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Maria DDias (talk) 11:26, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
everthing ...nathing
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

nathing
 * What I wanted more of:

nathing
 * What was unnecessary:

Nathing
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Maria DDias (talk) 11:39, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
... The Adventure itself, and the users' personalities. ... Some window sizes did not work well. Also, image captions were omitted. .... More content. ... Nothing. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What I wanted more of:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--.+*EclecticTempos*+. (my talk page) 17:01, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
The whole experience~!
 * What I liked:

Nothing! More information. Nothin. A medal for the end.
 * What I didn't like:
 * What I wanted more of:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Keanu Venter (talk) 20:18, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked: I liked the theme of the adventure and how it constructed a storyline.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of: Further development in advanced formatting would be helpful.

...
 * What was unnecessary: The multiple choice responses were really easy but provided good non-examples.

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share: It was cute, this is a really good program that you've got going and I'm really excited to contribute and help.

--StarwardJay (talk) 02:29, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Feedback
...The playful, funny tone
 * What I liked:

...Music selection could have been better
 * What I didn't like:

... More exercises
 * What I wanted more of:

... Popups. They were fun but also a bit irritating.
 * What was unnecessary:

...If only we could bring more human element within this game.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--SriSriChinmaya (talk) 07:43, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Feedback
... Loved the really easy step by step introduction ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

... Would have liked a quick summary at the end with links to help to save for next time ...
 * What I wanted more of:
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

Instructions on image inserting aren't as clear as others, e.g where do you insert the image, and as when you click the button you get the opportunity to insert more than one jpg what are you meant to do.

Thank you!

--Whowhywhenwhere (talk) 13:05, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Feedback
I felt that it covered the most salient aspects of editing the wikipedia. Also, I liked the overall tone, which is very positive and open.
 * What I liked:

After my browser (chrome) got hung and I had to kill it, I monitored the memory usage on my PC. It would quickly grow, especially when finishing up a topic, so I had to restart chrome repeatedly to avoid it hanging and forcing me to kill it again. I checked the list of bugs, and was surprised to find nothing about this in there. I am using "Version 98.0.4758.102 (Official Build) (64-bit)" of Chrome on Kubuntu 20.04 (KDE Plasma Version 5.18.8, KDE Frameworks Version 5.68.0, Qt Version: 5.12.8, Kernel Version 5.4.0-100-generic) on an HP Desktop with 4 x Intel Core i3-3440 CPU @3.30GHz with 7.6 GiB of RAM.
 * What I didn't like:

I'd like to scan and post some images in the enclosures to some CDs I have, so I would like to have learned more about how to do that without violating any copyright rules. Maybe I can find those guidelines on the wikimedia site?
 * What I wanted more of:

Having the tutorial popup follow me around on the other pages I would access while taking a break from the tutorial. I noticed that this issue is in the list of bugs people are working on, but you asked so I'm just sayin' it bugs me too.
 * What was unnecessary:

The image of GaiaGirl is a bit too bizarre for my tastes. It is difficult for me to see what's going on there.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

Tomhartung (talk) 20:58, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

It taught me lots of…let’s say stuff.
 * What I liked:

Every time I was asked to edit the source and then published changes, I was unable to 'progress' along the adventure. I simply got the option to go backwards or would get stuck in a loop of going back to complete the same action again and again. I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong or if there is an error. I'm using Safari. Thanks.
 * What I didn't like:

Accessibility. That’s something I can note.
 * What I wanted more of:

In my opinion, it should’ve been made like e.g. you just click the publish button instead of telling the program you did it.
 * What was unnecessary:

Thanks, but no thanks. Great experience!
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Tenuous tree (talk) 10:14, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Feedback
Embarassment is too harsh a word, but you performing edits on my behalf is not exactly congenial.--Pfc Headache, retd. (talk) 08:20, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Feedback
It was an excellent introduction to editing! Good for learning how to do basic tasks.
 * What I liked:

It was hard to use and interact with. You have to click everything in the correct order otherwise the whole thing breaks, and the X button should have a warning, such as "Are you sure you would like to exit mission?" when clicked.
 * What I didn't like:

More initiative on the user's part, a lot of it is copy & paste.
 * What I wanted more of:

The buttons you must press to signify you have copied text or added something, because they serve no functional purpose and if you do not press them it does not continue.
 * What was unnecessary:

The image insert part is either outdated or has a very misleading explanation.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Roundish (talk) 23:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Feedback
It taught me a lot about how you could add edit summaries to your talk page posts! Some of the information was outdated,or didn't include some details. For example, when adding an image, it didnt include what to do in the 'Alt' section.
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

Practice of talking with other people.
 * What I wanted more of:

The stats were a bit confusing.
 * What was unnecessary:

Thank you for doing this!
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--TeddyBearRocker123 (talk) 21:37, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Feedback
The theme was cute, the names of the characters in particular, and the soundbyte rewards were very funky.
 * What I liked:

While I can see how it would be great for junior editors, it was below my skill level, I finished it to ensure I had all the badges but some clarification of where one should be at in terms of capacity would have been nice.
 * What I didn't like:

Levels for higher-level editing stuff, but I suppose that's more of a 'learn as you edit' thing, right?
 * What I wanted more of:

Nothing :)
 * What was unnecessary:

I feel bad being so critical as on the whole I was quite impressed by the whole experience and would recommend it to everyone learning to use the internet.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--ManWithDominantClaw (talk) 10:17, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Feedback
That's easy and clear enough to understand for anyone who is willing to contribute to Wikipedia. The whole concept is wonderful and the storyline adorable and fun to follow!
 * What I liked:

If you forget to click the blue button of the conversation, which happened to me three or four times, the edit won't be taken into account by the storyline. But there is nothing that I actually disliked.
 * What I didn't like:

Some more editing and coding, perhaps.
 * What I wanted more of:

Nothing!
 * What was unnecessary:

Wikipedia is a wonderful platform and being able to contribute to it as a thank you, that's actually really cool. That's why I decided to travel space and embark on the Wikipedia Adventure!
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--OfaraZodyak (talk) 14:21, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Feedback
The font for the logo of The Wikipedia Adventure and the background were great. Also the error sounds and the general language.
 * What I liked:

Maybe it's because I'm set on UK English so it automatically tries to spell words that way, but when I went to wikilink to "Urbanisation", all I could get was "Urbanization" as that's the page. I guess there's no way of making the two fit for this quest?
 * What I didn't like:

Just one brief visit to The Tearoom. Perhaps more there would be good but then it might get too long.
 * What I wanted more of:

It all seemed fine.
 * What was unnecessary:

Good!
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--ButterCashier (talk) 18:43, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

This is my first discussion topic
This talk page has been set up to allow anyone to post me a message so that i can pick up on any issues that they have identified. WizardPrangNI (talk) 22:32, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Feedback
The Wikipedia adventure is awesome. It is highly motivating and entertaining. Ibjaja055 (talk) 05:29, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Feedback
... The fun way of learning
 * What I liked:

... It is not flowing very well with Mobile phone
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Ibjaja055 (talk) 07:24, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Feedback
Quick learn about editing article.
 * What I liked:

z ...
 * What I didn't like:
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--$oukm (talk) 19:06, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Feedback

 * What I liked:
 * Touched upon the important concepts.
 * The shortness of this section should not be construed as a low rating. I'm an experienced editor, so I played it mostly to test it.


 * What I didn't like:
 * A few times, I forgot to click "done editing" (or similar) in the dialog box before clicking Publish and it messed up the game flow. I had to go back and make a dummy edit to continue.
 * The  container for the simulated pages is too easy to mess up. It looks like I inadvertently added content after it on multiple occasions which messed it up (like here and here). In the second one, it also overlaps with existing page elements in an ugly way. I think it should be replaced with a simple heading template that doesn't require any closing tags.
 * On the talk page steps, the dialog box ends up with a second big blue "Start a new discussion" button before the intended game button, which is confusing because the "Start a new discussion" button will not advance the adventure, yet it is styled the same as the one you're supposed to click.


 * What I wanted more of:
 * I don't think the preview button was mentioned. Previewing is a good habit for new editors to get into. At least once, it should probably prompt you to preview before proceeding with clicking Publish. But only once (otherwise it's too annoying and bloats the flow), and give non-binding reminders after that.


 * What was unnecessary:
 * I mentioned this above, but the CSS styling containers on the TWA simulated pages are failure prone and should be replaced with something less breakable.


 * Any other thoughts you want to share:
 * I'm not a new editor, so my experience is different from the target audience.
 * It bloated my edit count by about 50. I guess that's fine?
 * The simulated teahouse has some weird styling particularly at the top of the page where a bunch of elements seem jumbled together in a mess of s and  s.
 * Some of the images provided for the last task, where you add images, don't really match up to the content. This was my page after following the instructions: User:Frogging101/TWA/Earth/2. They're all good images, but it's weird to end up with a photo of schoolgirls in the Orbit and rotation section. This is a nitpick, that's why I put it last.

--Frogging101 (talk) 17:21, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Feedback

 * What I liked:The adventure is an interesting way to learn the basic concepts and policy governing the Wikipedia...

...
 * What I didn't like: The UX might needs some retouch for better interaction.

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:Repeated steps even after such steps/phases.

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:It is a fun way of learning.

--Fatimah (talk) 21:59, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Feedback
Very useful and interactive tool/game!
 * What I liked:

This isn't a problem with TWA, but I didn't even know it existed until now, and I've been making minor edits for some time. I think this should be more visible on the Learn to edit page. It's very easy to follow!
 * What I didn't like:

n/a
 * What I wanted more of:

Technically, many parts, but I think it's engaging and well-designed. The fun stuff doesn't distract from the objective.
 * What was unnecessary:

TWA may need to updates in some parts. For example, it states that Commons has over 16 million files; it has now surpassed 89 million and is moving rapidly! Some proofreading of the grammar in the tutorial might also be advisable.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Corqe (talk) 19:53, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Feedback

 * What I liked:
 * The overall flow and theming, I enjoyed going from task to task
 * Receiving the badges - Love somewhat arbitrary achievements


 * What I didn't like:
 * I started the adventure on the new Wikipedia layout, and many of the locations referred to in the adventure just didn't line up. I had to go to the old layout in order to continue at some point early on.
 * I don't know why, but at certain points, especially when responding to the discussion, the adventure wouldn't let me continue unless I copy and pasted my change description verbatim. I don't know if this is intentional.
 * I don't know if this is new, but many of the pages had a black border around them, and any content I added would be added outside of the black border and look unnatural. I didn't see any messaging saying that my content should be added within the division, so I wonder if this is an oversight that can be easily fixed.


 * What I wanted more of:
 * I don't know how "advanced" it is, but I would love a slightly more fleshed out (optional?) section on templates. That's one of the most intimidating things to me as I'm entering this world, even though as I learn about templates they don't seem as hard as I thought navigating them could be.


 * What was unnecessary:
 * I felt like there was unnecessary amounts of time spent chatting in the discussion pages, but maybe I'm underestimating how important this is.


 * Any other thoughts you want to share:
 * I had a nice time going through the adventure!

--Agreen991 (talk) 16:17, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Ideas
A symphonyNJaylove (talk) 21:05, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Could we mention the COI guide in TWA? I think it would fit into the Neutrality section. (I did not know about COI and suggested an edit to a page about a friend and then had to undo it :D) VatBatCat (talk) 20:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Feedback: Great experience and some thoughts!
Hi TWA team! This was a great experience. I liked the clarity of the walkthrough overall. My only thought about the progression of events is that the Edit Source sections on the top of the page didn't show up with the most updated version of Wikipedia's interface, so I wasn't able to click on those until I changed my settings to an older Wikipedia interface. Thank you! Gapbridger (talk) 18:57, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Feedback
I loved how the tutorial walked you through editing articles that are tied to your user account, so you don't need to worry about screwing things up. I also really liked the emphasis on how everything is easily reversible, and how you are encouraged to edit articles.
 * What I liked:

I only really had two complaints in the tutorial, the first being that there's no way to skip past the badges being added without manually modifying the `step` section in the URL, and my second complaint was a careless error on my part that caused me to be stuck in the Rich Text Editor instead of the Source Editor.
 * What I didn't like:

I would love to have something added to the citations chapter on what to do if there are conflicting citations.
 * What I wanted more of:

Huge thanks to the creators of this experience! I love the user friendliness that Wikipedia shows and am excited to get editing!
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--UgackMiner (talk) 05:15, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Feedback
how quick it was; how complete and helpful
 * What I liked:

that it's over!
 * What I didn't like:

maybe a video watching a real edit happen
 * What I wanted more of:

I thought there was nothing unnecessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

I'm stoked to help! And thanks for creating the adventure.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Jonnyringo100 (talk) 17:28, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Feedback
It was a good intro to Wikipedia. I enjoyed earning the badges.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

I appreciated the emphasis on civility and how to communicate with other users/editors on Wikipedia
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Smstarck (talk) 20:14, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Feedback
The whole idea of learning via a game is so neat, and I liked that it was funny too..
 * What I liked:

Getting stuck on level 6...never did spot the "citation needed" tag...was it just me?
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Liminalme (talk) 21:01, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Feedback
I think this is a pretty good introduction to editing Wikipedia and understanding Wikipedia policy
 * What I liked:

Some of the boxes hovered over the parts of the editor that I needed to use for the tasks.
 * What I didn't like:

I think this should be more readily obvious to new Wikipedia editors. I only found this because I was looking through userboxes.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--MtPenguinMonster (talk) 11:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Feedback
The concept itself.
 * What I liked:

Seems bugged, or doesn't explicitly state what needs to be done. Some missions automatically congratulated me and gave me badges; others did not.
 * What I didn't like:

More missions.
 * What I wanted more of:

The humor.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Voxpiratica (talk) 22:12, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Feedback
I enjoyed how fast paced and informative this tutorial was. It boosted my confidence by a lot.
 * What I liked:

There were one or two bugs. When I followed the instructions on adding headers, the formatting broke. Not sure what's up with that but I was able to fix it. More information on how to do more advanced formatting would be nice. It would be cool if additional modules were added with this information. I think some of the social/civility stuff was unnecessary but I guess it's better to let people know the community policy for interactions. Not really, I'm still processing what I learned but I'll come back with more feedback if I think of anything else.
 * What I didn't like:
 * What I wanted more of:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--NormalStatisticalAnomaly (talk) 21:53, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked: Generally easy to follow, positive experience, I actually learned through doing without the stakes of having other Wikipedia editors see me fail.

...
 * What I didn't like: Sometimes it isn't clear where to click on the page -- might be an issue with the browser or display.

...
 * What I wanted more of: I liked the small quiz portions.

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--BarnumBrownie (talk) 11:27, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

Hi,

I'm wondering why a specific edit is challenged or removed? I was commenting on a conundrum in a short story and see that my edit is no longer there.

Thanks. --Skiath (talk) 15:49, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Feedback
Nice intro for new Wikipedians
 * What I liked:

Doesn't really work with the visual editor
 * What I didn't like:

visual editor support
 * What I wanted more of:

lack of visual editor support the unavoidable badges and notices on your user and talk pages
 * What was unnecessary:

𝓫𝓮𝓹𝓲𝓼
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--LOOKSQUARE (👤️·🗨️) talk 09:40, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Feedback
Habari!

The whole idea of learning via a game is so niceee, and I liked that it was funny too
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

As an admin and developer I want to do it too! on our swahili wikipedia to help new editor to learning quick and have fun can i get help ?
 * What I wanted more of:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Hussein m mmbaga (talk) 07:41, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Feedback
The guide is structured, and simulates well a real day-to-day scenario of editing and messaging on the talk page.
 * What I liked:

I think there were too many callouts, and I didn't understand why the tutorial adds pages to my user page without telling me how to delete/remove it, later.
 * What I didn't like:

Writing style exercises.
 * What I wanted more of:

I found that the badges and congrats were given after every few clicks. It's nice, but a bit overdone, TMHO. What does the "Congrats me" button do? I isn't clear; maybe just "next" or "continue to next mini-lesson".
 * What was unnecessary:

The callouts/dialogs were stuck without an option to move or minimize them. This interfered seeing the link and image dialog forms, as well as editing the text after clicking "Edit source". I had to enlarge the window size and move the underneath dialog just so I could see its form, or to scroll text behind the dialog when editing the source.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

Regarding content issues, I found these issues on units 6 or 7:


 * The image icon description is wrong, as there is no tree and sunset, but only two mountains.


 * WikiLove icon? There's no example of it; consider showing the icon, or a capture of the top section of another user's page.

-- Talchu (talk) 18:43, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Feedback
What I saw of the tutorial seemed like a good, basic foundation. Very interactive.
 * What I liked:

Getting stuck on level 3? Or was it 4? It wanted me to bold some text and save the change, which I did, but then it just booted me back to the same step and told me to bold the text again?
 * What I didn't like:

I would have liked to have seen more of the tutorial! Not to come across as passive-aggressive, it did really seem interesting!
 * What I wanted more of:

I do wish we hadn't had to edit our own user page so much. I don't really like drawing so much attention to myself when I don't know what I'm doing. Then again, I can understand wanting to get the worst mistakes out of the way on a new user page with very little time invested into it rather than on an article.
 * What was unnecessary:

This was on Firefox, Ver. 119.0.1, Win10.
 * Any other thoughts you want to share:

--Canguild (talk) 04:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Continue the tour here. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:16, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I managed to complete it, thank you for the assist!
 * Canguild (talk) 14:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)