Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/December 2019

Copy edit tracking and report
All done. Many thanks to the copy editors

For watchers of this page: Note that January's TFAs have started to be scheduled. I have opened a tracking page for them here. Gog the Mild (talk) 10:06, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Key:
 * Bold: Done or triaged as not required.
 * Italics: Probably good enough; could do with a look over if time permits, but not a priority.
 * Asterisk: Requires attention. Please feel free to mark it with, put a note on the article's talk page and copy edit it.

1. 8 years since promotion. An experienced nominator has maintained it. IMO it could do with a light touch look over if time permits.
 * ✅ Light touch, aye! Reidgreg (talk) 22:12, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

2. 8 years since promotion. Nominator no longer active. IMO could use a copy edit.
 * ✅ Gog the Mild (talk) 20:00, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

3. 11 years since nomination. Experienced nominator is no longer active. IMO could use a copy edit. Not for me as it is American football.
 * Posted to GOCE:Req. ✅ (TfT)

4. Promoted 11 months ago by an experienced nominator who has maintained it. IMO this can be skipped.

5. 4 years since promotion. Experienced nominator is no longer active. Few edits since promotion. IMO this can be skipped.

6. Promoted 7 months ago by an experienced nominator. Few edits since promotion. IMO this can be skipped.

7. 9 years since promotion. Experienced nominator who has maintained it. IMO this can be skipped.

8. Promoted 2 months ago by an experienced nominator. IMO this can be skipped.

9. Promoted 11 months ago by an experienced nominator. Few edits since. IMO it could do with a light touch look over if time permits.
 * ✅ Gog the Mild (talk) 22:31, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

10. Promoted 12 months ago by an experienced nominator. IMO could use a copy edit.
 * Very minor changes, looked good to me. Reidgreg (talk) 22:54, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

11. 12 years since promotion. Nominator no longer active. IMO could use a copy edit. Not for me as it is a Simpsons' episode.
 * Posted to GOCE:Req. ✅ (TfT)

12. Promoted 2 months ago. Experienced nominator. It got a thorough reviewing and IMO it can be skipped.

13. Promoted 9 months ago. Experienced nominator. It got glowing reviews and IMO it can be skipped.

14. Promoted 6 months ago by an experienced nominator. IMO it could do with a copy edit; I will do it.
 * ✅ Gog the Mild (talk) 13:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

15. 7 years since promotion. An experienced nominator has maintained it. IMO it could do with a light touch look over if time permits.
 * Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:11, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

16. Promoted 3 months ago. Experienced nominator. It got a thorough reviewing and IMO it can be skipped.

17. A dubious article by a recalcitrant nominator. I am unsure what to make of it.
 * Surprising the blurb fails to include the early introduction air mail via trebuchet. Wright Brothers be damned. – Reidgreg (talk) 23:52, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
 * The mail must get through. Gog the Mild (talk) 11:54, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

18. 8 years since promotion. An experienced nominator has maintained it. IMO it could do with a light touch look over if time permits.
 * Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:47, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

19. Promoted 18 months ago by an experienced nominator. Few edits since and IMO this can be skipped.

20. Promoted 4 months ago as a first time FACer. IMO could use a copy edit.
 * Posted to GOCE:Req. ✅ Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:14, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

21. Promoted 4 months ago by an experienced nominator. IMO it could do with a light touch look over if time permits.
 * Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

22. Promoted 6 months ago. Experienced nominator. It got a thorough reviewing and IMO it can be skipped.

23. 8 years since promotion. An experienced nominator has maintained it. IMO it could do with a light touch look over if time permits.
 * Twofingered Typist (talk) 22:41, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

24. Promoted this month by an experienced nominator. IMO this can be skipped.

25. Promoted this month ago by an experienced nominator. IMO this can be skipped.

26. Promoted this month ago by an experienced nominator. IMO it could do with a light touch look over if time permits.
 * minor MOS cleanup only Reidgreg (talk) 15:28, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

27. Promoted 8 months ago by an experienced nominator. IMO it could do with a copy edit.
 * ✅ Gog the Mild (talk) 13:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

28. 5 years since promotion. Two experienced nominators. IMO it could do with a copy edit. Probably best to leave this one.
 * Left extensive notes at . Reidgreg (talk) 21:22, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

29. 7 years since promotion. An experienced nominator has maintained it. IMO it could do with a light touch look over if time permits.
 * Gog the Mild (talk) 16:11, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

30. 4 years since promotion. An experienced nominator has maintained it. IMO it could do with a light touch look over if time permits.
 * Perhaps a little verbose in places, but nothing I felt had to be changed. Reidgreg (talk) 16:23, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

31. 8 years since promotion. An experienced nominator has maintained it. IMO this can be skipped.

Gog the Mild (talk) 12:33, 25 November 2019 (UTC)