Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/January 14, 2013

This description needs work. It gives no indication to the reader why this event is significant. It reads as a random, everyday sports news item. The way it is written, it sounds as if Woodfull's injuries were significant, but they were not. I'm guessing that the significance of this story is that leaks were unheard of in that era, and the major part of the scandal was the leak itself, who leaked it, and why. The description on the front page does not reflect the scandal of the leak. Kingturtle = (talk) 16:35, 14 January 2013 (UTC)