Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests/instructions/temp

Changes removed
I reverted the change first to remove the headings (the intructions are in a separate instructions page and aren't edited from the main page and don't belong in the TOC; see other FA pages), intending to restore the other text changes. I found I couldn't restore the text changes for several reasons. Most of the changes to point description either weren't clear or weren't accurate, and putting the description of how to replace article based on points, before the points were defined, didn't flow either. The current page agrees with what we currently have; it if needs to be changed, let's discuss. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 22:12, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with how it is. Wrad (talk) 22:14, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Now or before? The points description changes were off, unclear, and not accurate; I was able to save some of the changes, though, like the Adding requests section, and the combo of the final points section into one bullet.  Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 22:19, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I hope that version didn't confuse people coming to evaluate the page (that's what I get for taking a mid-day nap :) ?  Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 22:21, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Good collaboration. I think it looks great (3 numbered bullets is a lot better than 4 plus a sentence). Three quick things. First, I think headings are included. Maybe the other talk page will gather a comment from an expert but I believe headings are needed for accessibility--how will an old screen reader know the presentational element "big" is a heading? Also, is there any way to combine the instructions into one section (replacement is discussed both above and below the points criteria)? And just a tweak, can "Total points are the sum of up to one choice for each of the following five criteria." replace "Points are summed based on the following five criteria:"? Thanks. —SusanLesch (talk) 22:36, 2 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Hang on, I'll look into these and be right back ... will check on the heading issue? Wrad, if you're around, can you make sure the current chart is accurate before we move it in?  Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 22:41, 2 July 2008 (UTC)


 * OK, I fixed the heading issue by making it agree with all of the FA pages; general description of the page in the first box, nitty-gritty of instructions in the second box. Is it better now?  Ready?  Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 23:02, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes. Nice work. —SusanLesch (talk) 23:07, 2 July 2008 (UTC)


 * OK, moving in ... Sandy Georgia (Talk) 23:08, 2 July 2008 (UTC)