Wikipedia talk:Userboxes/Sandbox

Please remove deletedpage from this redlink. It's the height of folly to delete something for being "self-referential", and then put a HUGE self-referentual block tag on it. It also mucks with the search engine, I expect. -- nae'blis 18:40, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Can somebody with a bot orphan this page? It should be a redlink with no incoming links (other than such that say it should be a redlink). Kusma (討論) 11:29, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, that would be nice. Haukur 11:35, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I changed the article to a redirection to Userboxes. --Anthony5429 14:36, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * And I have deleted it again. Please do not recreate it. Kusma (討論) 14:40, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't see why this article is being deleted... it should have a redirect to WP:Userboxes. Stalin.PoG 20:42, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The consensus is that it should be a redlink. Not a redirect, not a deletedpage, not a picture of Wikipe-tan climbing the Reichstag dressed as a pelican, a redlink. See the discussion at Deletion review. --Sam Blanning(talk) 00:40, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, I can't think of anything that is not Wikipedia, that might be called a Userbox. Stalin.PoG 04:40, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I created the article Userbox/Sandbox a moment ago. Its a very short article, but the idea is to create a decent article about userboxes in general, that could be copied over to the main article once its finished, replacing the redlink. Please help me expanding it (or reply to this comment and tell me your opinion). --Kuckzul 12:49, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

This is all stuff for the Wikipedia: namespace not (Main). I have moved Userbox/Sandbox to Userboxes/Sandbox. -- RHaworth 19:06, 20 August 2006 (UTC)