Wikipedia talk:VisualEditor/Improvements

You might find the following list of 196 bugs classified as "enhancement" useful for this page: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?f1=bug_severity&list_id=222981&o1=equals&resolution=---&resolution=WONTFIX&resolution=LATER&query_format=advanced&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=PATCH_TO_REVIEW&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&v1=Enhancement&component=ContentEditable&component=Data%20Model&component=Editing%20Tools&component=General&component=Initialisation&component=MediaWiki%20integration&component=Mobile&component=Technical%20Debt&product=VisualEditor Thryduulf (talk) 18:12, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Wording of the introduction
If you really want users to contribute to this page, you should make the introduction unbiased: --NicoV (Talk on frwiki) 07:05, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * VE is probably the future: thks for adding probably but it's still biased. I think for many users it won't be their future as I doubt we get to a point where VE can do everything that can be done in wikitext, and as efficient.
 * does not seem to be particularly constructive: that's your opinion, and clearly not shared by many participating in the RFC who think that the VE team is simply not listening to their concerns (opt-in/opt-out, permanent option to disable VE, nowiki, ...)