Wikipedia talk:Vital articles/Level/3/Archive 4

Remove
This article does not compare in scale with WWII, the Industrial Revolution, and the Information Age. Interstellarity (talk) 00:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Support
 * 1) Interstellarity (talk) 00:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 2)  should already cover the topic of agriculture revolutions.  The  Blue  Rider  Postal horn icon.svg 11:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 3) per above.  starship .paint  (RUN) 14:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 4) Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 5) History of agriculture is listed at this level. --Thi (talk) 07:21, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 6) Based on the preview popup image I first thought it'd be about prehistoric development of agriculture, but then I read further and realised this is about events in the 20th century. Far less foundational than, redundant to at this level.-- Laukku  TheGreit  (Talk•Contribs) 08:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 7)  Vileplume  🍋‍🟩 ( talk ) 00:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Oppose


 * Neutral


 * Discussion

Remove
He is probably the most important businessperson we have on here, but I'm not sure if he's that important to warrant being a Level 3.


 * Support
 * 1) SailorGardevoir (talk) 19:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Oppose
 * 1) It's about the representation, same reason we have two obscure speed skaters at V4.  Vileplume  🍋‍🟩 ( talk ) 21:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
 * - representation of what? Business? American cars? Why him and not say, or, given the ubiquity of Microsoft computers and iPhones?  starship  .paint  (RUN) 02:28, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * BLPs do not belong at V3, even if they are as notable as Gates, but I am not as opposed to Jobs and would support his addition if Ford must be removed. Vileplume  🍋‍🟩 ( talk ) 02:33, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I just want to make this clear, I'm really just doing this so I can get my Ali proposal passed. SailorGardevoir (talk) 10:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose there are some business people whose companies changed the course of human history, is definitely one, as is  (who should be at level 3).  In contrast,  got very rich on an over-priced OS system and is not at the same level. Aszx5000 (talk) 16:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 2) I'd say both him and Steve Jobs could be on this level at the same time. They're both worthy. λ  Negative  MP1  15:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Discuss

Remove
We are over quota at 1,003, and we already list which includes abstract algebra. Something has got to go here.  starship .paint  (RUN) 09:47, 11 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Support
 * 1) as nom.  starship  .paint  (RUN) 09:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 2) Support per nom. --Thi (talk) 11:47, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 3) SailorGardevoir (talk) 19:21, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 4) Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 13:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 5) λ  Negative  MP1  15:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Oppose


 * Discuss

Add
Extremely common structure, most of us live in them, many of us work in them, also used for shopping, schooling, airports etc.  starship .paint  (RUN) 02:50, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Support
 * 1) as nom.  starship  .paint  (RUN) 02:50, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 2) SailorGardevoir (talk) 19:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 3) Support Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 13:39, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 4) Interstellarity (talk) 12:01, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * 5) λ  Negative  MP1  15:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Oppose


 * Discuss

Add
Since we have on here, I think we should have Ali on here as well. The whole issue on whether he should have succeeded Muhammad immediately is the reason why Islam is mostly split into Sunni and Shia, and unlike the relationship between Catholicism and Protestantism, tensions between the two branches still flare up from time to time.


 * Support
 * 1) SailorGardevoir (talk) 10:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 2) Per nom. Ali is definitely second to Muhammad in Islam. Aszx5000 (talk) 16:49, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 3) Fair to have a second person for Islam.  starship  .paint  (RUN) 13:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 4) λ  Negative  MP1  15:33, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * 5) Interstellarity (talk) 23:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Oppose


 * Discuss
 * - can you propose to remove something? We are already over quota. I firmly believe that nominators and supporters should do the work to keep us within the quota, instead of having other editors have to put in the effort to find more articles to remove.  starship .paint  (RUN) 07:37, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Do I have to pick a religious figure? SailorGardevoir (talk) 10:07, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
 * - no, there aren't quotas here.  starship .paint  (RUN) 12:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Remove
Seems more suited for V4 when you compare the other V3 Math articles in that section (e.g., , , ). Yes, it's Top-importance for Math, but so are another 200+ articles.  starship .paint  (RUN) 09:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Support
 * 1) as nom.  starship  .paint  (RUN) 09:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 2) SailorGardevoir (talk) 19:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 3) Support per nom. Aszx5000 (talk)
 * 4) λ  Negative  MP1  15:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * 5) Interstellarity (talk) 23:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Oppose


 * Discuss