Wikipedia talk:Where to get feedback on an article you've just created

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

Page moved to Where to get feedback on an article you've just created. Consensus is clear to move, the issue remained where. There are pluses and minuses for the various names. Let's give this one a try and see if it works. If not, feel free to renominate. If you do so, please read the comments below and any new proposal should address all of the concerns presented below against a proposed new name. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:05, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Where to get feedback on your new article → Where to get feedback on article you just created — Relisted mostly to determine consensus on a new name. Where to get feedback on an article you just created or Where to get feedback on an article you created or something else? Vegaswikian (talk) 21:12, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * This may sound like a weird title, but the title as it is might make some users (especially new users) think it contradict WP:OWN. In other words, The guidelines state no one owns the articles they create, but then why does it say here that I can find places to get feedback on my new article? Erpert (let's talk about it) 20:38, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Support This is a very good point Erpert. I would prefer this wording (I think this is what you meant to do, anyway), which is clearer & also solves the obvious problem: Where to get feedback on the article you just created. The same problem exists with WP:Why was my page deleted?. I'd like to see both pages subjected to the same scrutiny and policy, for exactly the reason detailed by Erpert. Duff (talk) 06:30, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I placed another very similar RfM at WP:Why was my page deleted? for precisely the same reason. Duff (talk) 09:04, 10 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Oppose- Although I applaud what you are trying to do here, the name you are suggesting doesn't sound very good or grammatically correct. A more appropriate name would be: Where to get feedback on an article you've just created. --WikiDonn (talk) 22:47, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: I could support Where to get feedback on a new article. Jafeluv (talk) 05:03, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Support move to Where to get feedback on the article you just created per Duff. 92.0.63.81 (talk) 08:14, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Support WikiDonn's more grammatically correct version: Where to get feedback on an article you've just created. Cheers,    A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 23:17, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Suppport move to WikiDonn's version. Current page title is misleading for the reason given by the nominator. Dpmuk (talk) 12:02, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - maybe even better would be to remove the "just", to be more concise? As in, Where to get feedback on an article you've created.     A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 13:26, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Here the word "just" means "very recently", and is needed to distinguish from articles created longer ago. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:49, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Right, but do you think it is necessary? Can this page also pertain to older pages?  It reads easier without it, is all - but it's a minor point. Regards,    A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 20:10, 16 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments post relisting.
 * Support move to something, but would suggest Wikipedia:Where to get feedback on a newly-created article if the original form is to be modified, though I think Wikipedia:New article feedback locations or Wikipedia:New article feedback forums might be better yet as the title.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 11:17, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.