Wikipedia talk:WikiBrowse

Looks like a great tool, but...
It's certainly not notable enough for inclusion in the mainspace. Please, someone userfy or projectify this--if no one contests this proposal in a few days, I'll move it to projectspace. AmiDaniel (talk) 10:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong oppose : This is a very useful and notable tool, please stop the deletion process. !--Khalid hassani 12:17, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I tend to agree with AmiDaniel, while it is a useful tool of interest to editors of wikipedia, it makes no claim to its notability, so fails WP:SOFTWARE. Most of the tools for accessing wikipedia tend to exist in the Wikipedia: and User: name spaces, which seems a reasonable solution. --Salix alba (talk) 13:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Does it support .xcf data?Geni 14:28, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Looks familiar
It look strangely familiar to a version of an encyclopedia from Microsoft that I've used before. Here are some comment on the program as of 24 February 2008 The software however doesn't seem to get updated much as the version currently available on their website dates back more than 5 month. — Dispenser 05:22, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Interface
 * Lack of accessibility (lack of a text copying functions in some areas)
 * Some icons are hidden while maximized in a 800x600 screen
 * Would like a dark color scheme
 * Missing a history list
 * Extra mouse button and rocker gesture support
 * Scrolling shouldn't change the current search results since the focus stays in the Find box
 * Search
 * The WikiMedia search isn't very good
 * Maybe use using Google? It at least has spell checker.
 * Kinda miss the the side search pannel
 * Would be nice if the search & highlight was integrated in the search
 * Other
 * Would be nice to have a category explorer where I could transverse down the classical category system
 * Maybe include the Gutenberg Encyclopedia somehow
 * Doesn't include WP:WikiMiniAtlas (Although looking at it, its still quite a bit ways off from Encarta's atlas)