Wikipedia talk:WikiPrincess

Sexism
Why is this page so sexist? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.54.11.218 (talk • contribs) 12:11, 14 January 2010


 * This "WikiFauna" was created to fit in with the medieval theme, and fit beautifully with dragons and knights. If you can find a way to work princes into the article, be my guest. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 05:31, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * These pages have since diverged from the fantasy/medieval theme (WP:WikiChef, WP:WikiJanitor, etc.), and it could easily be gender neutralized as a princess/prince page, anyway.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  19:26, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Brilliant
I must say this is brilliant. A very true page!-- TheFE ARgod (Ч) 23:30, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

I love this article!
This page describes me perfectly! Thepoodlechef (talk) 04:45, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Should probably be moderated a bit
This should probably be recast in slightly less "does nothing useful at all" terms, or it won't work as a self-identification, only as a WP:DIVA- or WP:DICK-style labeling/attack page. This could fairly easily be rewritten to suggest that such users focus on social aspects of the site rather than on contributing to content, rather than suggesting that they never do any content work and feel themselves "above" it. As presently written, anyone who actually fit the description on this page qualified for account deletion as WP:NOTHERE to work on the encyclopedia. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  19:26, 19 August 2016 (UTC)