Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albania/Archive 8

WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject
The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

Portals are being redesigned.

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template Transclude lead excerpt.

The discussion about this can be found here.

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.

Background
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.

There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

So far, 84 editors have joined.

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.

Thank you. &mdash; The Transhumanist  07:25, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Bazilika paleokristiane në Lin
Hello! There are two articles for the exact same cultural monument, and I do not understand this at all. I've been to Lin many times, I do have archaeological papers that I've read through, and there is only one basilica ruin in Lin which was built in the first half of the 6th century, then burnt down in the 8th century, and it is the one with the fabulous mosaic floor. That said, as I see. there are two articles for the same: Byzantine Church, Lin vs Paleochristian Church, Lin.

What makes me even more confused and I don't know how to sort this out is that it is the exact same situation on the Bulgarian Wikipedia: bg:Линска византийска църква vs bg:Линска базилика. And obviously there are two Wikidata records, too. How is it possible to merge the two? Pasztilla (talk) 18:33, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Requested move discussion needing more input
G'day all, There is a RM at Talk:Albanian_Kingdom_(1939–43) that needs more input. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:16, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Regarding The region of Epirus
Hello everyone!

I just wanted to let you know that I think we need to work more on the pages concerning south albania. For example, there are countless books writing about the albanian schols there since the 17 century and no one mentions them there. Moreover, in the article of Epirus itself, the greek editors are portraying everything as if it was always greek and the Albanians stole their land, which is simply unacceptable! Do you also think we need to do more on these article, as to give a clearer view to everyone that our country is NOT what the neighbors portray it to be in many occasiosn? I hope we can do something about it.

Lastly, in the page of Epirus in itself, they on purpose do not include a german map of the time, showing the real demographics of the entire balkans at the time, with the excuse that the map is too big(which is utter bollocks) Can we also do something together to add that there too? No one should even think to lower our country and portray us like something we are not, especially when the pages concern our cities and regions. The map at stake is this one https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Balkans-ethnic_%281861%29.jpg and this should immediately be included in the page of Epirus. Please let's all together do something about this.

Cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.26.41.112 (talk) 17:24, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

RfC on election/referendum naming format
An RfC on moving the year from the end to the start of article titles (e.g. South African general election, 2019 to 2019 South African general election) has been reopened for further comment, including on whether a bot could be used move the articles if it closed in favour of the change: Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (government and legislation). Cheers, Number   5  7  15:33, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Need help reviewing some drafts
Could somebody please look at: These were all created within a few minutes of each other by an editor who has done nothing else. Much of the writing and sourcing is quite poor. Many of the sources are not in English, which adds the difficulty I have evaluating them. Is there anything here worth saving? -- RoySmith (talk) 03:17, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Draft:Battle of Bukovik
 * Draft:The Heads of the Malësia Highlands against the Montenegrin invasion
 * Draft:The Albanian Great Doors
 * Draft:The Stamp of the League of Prizren
 * , the editor appears to be inexperienced. I think the article  Battle of Bukovik has promise provided the editor gets some wp:secondary. The other three have some content which can be redistributed to other articles, but them existing in their own right does not suffice. Is it possible to return all those drafts to the editor (and place it in their sandbox) and tell them something similar as i have said here. Best.Resnjari (talk) 03:52, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

A new newsletter directory is out!
A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
 * – Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride!
 You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!


 * What? Wiki Loves Pride, a campaign to document and photograph LGBT culture and history, including pride events
 * When? June 2015
 * How can you help?
 * 1.) Create or improve LGBT-related articles and showcase the results of your work here
 * 2.) Upload photographs or other media related to LGBT culture and history, including pride events, and add images to relevant Wikipedia articles; feel free to create a subpage with a gallery of your images (see examples from last year)
 * 3.) Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing!

User:Another Believer and User:OR drohowa (timestamp may not be accurate) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Another Believer (talk • contribs) 15:13, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Portal:Albania for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:Albania is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Albania until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America1000 01:50, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:23, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Besim Tafilaj
Please feel free to comment. Assistance from Albanian speaking wikipedias would be appreciated.4meter4 (talk) 00:55, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Help needed
Hello fellow editors, members of wikiproject Albania.

I would appreciate your help with one issue that I think I found when I wrote an article about Kulen Vakuf massacre, a massacre of Muslims and Croats committed by Serb rebels in 1941. After I finished editing this article I realized there is one major and quite obvious mistake with it. I don't think there are major issues with following wikipedia policies. I think there is a mistake on major, conceptual level. To check if my perspective is right I deliberately asked several editors (members of WP Croatia, WP Bosnia and Herzegovina and WP Serbia), even those editors with whom I had numerous disputes in past (having different perspective than me), to check what they think about this article, but I have not received any confirmation or denial of my perception. Will you please be so kind to help me and give me your opinion about this article and if you think there is some major conceptual level issue with it? Best regards, --Antidiskriminator (talk) 18:39, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Category:Demographics of the Western Balkans has been nominated for discussion
Category:Demographics of the Western Balkans has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 14:47, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Make WikiProject Ottoman Empire a task force of Wikipedia:WikiProject Former countries?
Dear users of this WikiProject:

At Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Former_countries I have left a proposal to convert WikiProject Ottoman Empire into a task force of WikiProject Former countries. I asked this project (as all or parts of this country was/were formerly in the Ottoman Empire) and several other projects to get further feedback. Please let me know if you have questions, comments, or objections.

Thanks, WhisperToMe (talk) 02:09, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Assessment box, updated
Greetings - For Albania WP statistics, I added progression, pie chart, rainbow & wikilinks "Quality operations" and "Popular pages". JoeNMLC (talk) 17:46, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Dejzi - eyes please
Please will someome familiar with Albanian publications check the referencing of this draft. I can get a sense with Google Translate, but cannto know about WP:RS? If it is suitable as an article please accept it if you are an AFC reviewer, or, if not please ping me and I will do so Fiddle   Faddle  17:20, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Cem
Hello, everybody. Cem, an article under the scope of this wikiproject is one of the oldest unreviewed GA nominations at WP:GAN. A large factor that has kept it in that state is the fact that many sources are in Albanian. It'd be much appreciated if an editor active in this project, did the review. Thank you.--Maleschreiber (talk) 18:33, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Collaborative Project
Hello, everybody. I was thinking of ways for WP-Albania to function as a collaborative project for its topic area. A first step towards that direction might be to pick an article which members of the project could work on in order to expand and improve it substantially over a given period. Now, every collaborative project at its heart functions as a direct democracy, so I was thinking that several articles could be nominated and after a one-week voting period, we could choose the one which project members would improve over a one-month period. --Maleschreiber (talk) 17:37, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 February 15 § Orphaned files uploaded by Krise
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 February 15 § Orphaned files uploaded by Krise. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

CCI closed
Contributor copyright investigations/20130224 just wrapped up. A lot of content was removed and some articles were deleted for copyright violations. The page is blanked, but the second-most-recent edit in the history has a full list of the articles. If the article had important content, it should be possible to rewrite it faithfully to be in-line with the copyright policy. Thanks and kind regards, Sennecaster   ( What now? ) 02:11, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Article Re-Assessment?
Hey everyone,

I recently completed a major overhaul of the Sanjak of Dibra article, and its nearly completely rewritten. I added a lot of new information regarding its dissolution and the final days of Albania under Ottoman rule, and also reformatted the demographics data into a chart, along with other edits.

I have absolutely no connection to Albania and don't speak a word of the language, but I just happened to come across the article for the sanjak and something struck me to want to edit it. On the Wikiproject Albania/ Assessment page, there wasn't an area to request assessment, so I was wondering if anyone here would be able to take a look and maybe upgrade it from Start Class.

Thanks,

Eggventura (talk) 02:36, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Most-viewed stub article within this Wikiproject
Kukës International Airport	14,974	499	Stub (Higher articles had WP:Recentism)--Coin945 (talk) 16:38, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Orthodox Church of Albania
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Orthodox Church of Albania that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — Shibboleth ink  (♔ ♕) 12:28, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

RM: Jemal Pasha Zogolli → Xhemal Pasha Zogu
An editor has requested for Jemal Pasha Zogolli to be moved to Xhemal Pasha Zogu. Since you had some involvement with Jemal Pasha Zogolli, you might want to participate in the move discussion (if you have not already done so).

Two editors agree on an alt proposal to move to Xhemal Pasha Zogolli but further input would assist in forming a clear consensus. Havelock Jones (talk) 08:21, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

About new article Fabian Barcata - name in Shqip?
Hi all,

While in the process of looking for references for this new article in Italian and English, I noticed that there might possibly a number of what would appear to be good references in Albanian.

Perhaps we could start off with this question: what is the person "Fabian Barcata" most commonly called in Albanian?

Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:10, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Talk:Firdeusi Institute
I just added this page to this WikiProject after doing some copy edits, but I think that it would benefit from being renamed (see talk page). It would benefit from the attention of an Albanian speaker. -- asilvering (talk) 16:44, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

RfC that concerns this topic
There is an RfC there that concerns this topic. Every opinion or other input is welcome. Ktrimi991 (talk) 21:54, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

User script to detect unreliable sources
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like and turns it into something like
 * John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
 * John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from cite web, cite journal and doi.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Balkan Latinity WikiProject
Hello, I've been thinking for a while of an idea for a new and certainly needed WikiProject. The Aromanians/Vlachs, Megleno-Romanians/Meglenites and Istro-Romanians/Ćiribirci are poorly known peoples in the Balkans, the only ones that are Romance-speaking apart of the Romanians. Tagging pages related to these with WikiProject templates can turn problematic, see this talk page for example, saturated with 7 different templates. I was thus thinking that giving them their own WikiProject could increase organization on Wikipedia about info on these peoples and increase their representation in the project, perhaps even attracting members of these groups into working at Wikipedia. The project could be split into three task forces for each of the three.

If you're interested, please ping me here or message me on my talk page. Expressing your interest in the existence of such a project is enough, you will not be compromised or pressured into working in a topic area you might lose interest to soon. After (if) I recruit enough support, I will start a formal proposal and ping you there. Regards, Super   Ψ   Dro  20:52, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Taksim meeting (new article)
So, I have been working on this article about the Taksim meeting for several weeks. I'm close to publishing it but I would ask for someone's help to check on syntax and errors correcting spelling mistakes (if any). The article is not completely finished because there is some work to be done... so feel free to help there as well. - Bes-ART Talk  18:30, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I can do some proofreading later today.--Maleschreiber (talk) 21:06, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello again. Can you do the same thing here? I am close on publishing this article and I have very few details left to fix. -- Bes-ART Talk  17:26, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Definitely, yes.--Maleschreiber (talk) 18:29, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * @Maleschreiber Hello again, hope you are well. Please, when you have time (if you have?), can you do the same thing HERE as with the other two you helped me with? Thanks in advance  Bes-ART  Talk  21:13, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I hadn't seen it, tomorrow it'll be done :) --Maleschreiber (talk) 23:13, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Pending deletion of television categories
The category Category:20th century in Albanian television (and its subcategories) have been marked for deletion since they are currently empty (of anything other than other empty categories).

If there are any existing Wikipedia articles covering that topic, it would be advisable to add the appropriate category to those articles before the deletion process begins on 19 July 2022. (Categories can always be re-created as necessary, but less experienced editors may be more likely to add an existing category to an article than try and learn how to make new ones.)

Justifications for keeping the category, even though it is momentarily empty, should probably be copied to the Category talk:20th century in Albanian television page for future reference. Jim Grisham (talk) 04:58, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Moscopole
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Moscopole that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.Alexikoua (talk) 00:28, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Zenevisi family
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Zenevisi family that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:45, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Request for input at 2001 insurgency in Macedonia
Your participation in a proposed merge of Vaksince Attack and Vaksince offensive into 2001 insurgency in Macedonia is requested as a WikiProject related to its topic. Please add your opinions at the 2001 insurgency in Macedonia talk page signed,Rosguill talk 23:49, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Initial post
Sorry if this is patently obvious to you guys but (a) where is the MOS style guide for Albanian entries? If there is one, please create the normal redirects so it's easier to find from guesses like MOS:Alb... WP:Alb... &c. Link it prominently on the front page here. If there is one and you already did that and I'm somehow missing it, apologies but seriously where is it?

(b) If there isn't one but you've got a convention of including certain odd things like definite/indefinite forms of the placenames, go ahead and create one and list the unique aspects of the Albanian entries and the rationale.

(c) In particular, I don't know any Albanian grammar but, based on the gloss of definiteness at Albanian language and the gloss of Albanian uses at definiteness, it makes absolutely no sense to (eg) list alt forms as an essential feature of any of these articles. Either placenames are treated as definite (le Paris) or not (Paris), but they shouldn't randomly change definiteness. I get that you might know Sheila or a Sheila, but it's incomprehensible in English how you could ever talk about a Paris in any meaningful, non-navel-gazing poetic sense. What's going on there and why is it important to list so prominently in the of all these articles?

The nearest thing I can think of is that what's being called 'indefinite' is really trying to talk about attributive uses (China vs. China blue or East China Sea, e.g.) Is that what it is? If so, are we locked into this misnamed description of what it actually means?

(d) Note also that while these unclear forms seem to be cluttering up most of the Albanian location entries, the capital that gets more general visitors and treatment has already shunted this oddity down to its footnotes. I think it's probably more helpful—especially for Tirana—to have a #Name section like Durrës but that name section should quickly gloss what these in/definite forms are doing and when to use one instead of the other. — Llywelyn II   15:14, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

RFC
Well, no one's posting here. Y'all are all welcome over here at the Naming Convention talkpage. I assume your opinions as locals and fluent speakers would be extremely helpful. — Llywelyn II   07:21, 10 December 2022 (UTC)


 * There is a proposal for article titles for Albanian places at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names) open for discussion:
 * "For places in Albania, use the indefinite Albanian name (e.g. "Vlorë", "Durrës")."
 * For places that have a different widely used name in English (like Tirana) the general rule to use the widely accepted name will still apply. Markussep Talk 20:24, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 * It also badly needs improvement somewhere on Wikipedia for coverage of how definiteness works in Albanian, since this will need to be covered and linked in any article on an Albanian placename and plenty that involve technical Albanian terms (eg the country's current and historic administrative divisions). — Llywelyn II   14:14, 18 December 2022 (UTC)


 * You may find this elaborate grammar of Albanian interesting. See chapter 3, notably paragraph 3.2.5 (page 167 of 365). Maybe someone has time to rephrase this into something we can use in the Albanian morphology or Albanian language article. Since noone objected, I'm going to add the proposed rule to the naming conventions page. Markussep Talk 10:44, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Ashkali and Balkan Eygptians: association with the Roma
Hi. Could you please have a look at Talk:Ashkali and Balkan Egyptians and provide a comment? Thank you. --TadejM my talk 09:51, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Project-independent quality assessments
Quality assessments are used by Wikipedia editors to rate the quality of articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a class parameter to WikiProject banner shell, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to WikiProject banner shell, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project decides to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass WPBannerMeta a new custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:47, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Battle of Torvioll
Battle of Torvioll has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:12, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Polog front
This might not be strictly Albania but I hope someone who frequents WikiProjects for this part of Europe could evaluate this undersourced article. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:26, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Articles for deletion
There are two deletion discussions which would benefit from the attention of editors familiar with Albanian matters. They are Articles for deletion/Mustafa Merko and Articles for deletion/Mustafa Merko Balli Kombetar General. Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 20:42, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

POV-pushing at Simple English Wikipedia
Hello, I'd advise editors with expertise in Albanian matters to take a look at the edits of this user in Simple English Wikipedia. They made a series of POV edits in controversial topics with very little sensitivity. Currently the Fustanella article there describes the fustanella as Greek and that the Albanian one is based on the Greek one. I don't know a lot about it but our article on English Wikipedia seems careful not to claim it as belonging originally to one single people. There might also be problems in other pages. Arvanites also reads differently from our article here, even if as I understand the current consensus is that they can be referred to as Greek people. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 10:10, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Women in Green's 5th Edit-a-thon
 Hello WikiProject Albania:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a  month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there! Grnrchst (talk) 12:34, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Byzantine Empire Featured article review
I have nominated Byzantine Empire for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Lake Skadar
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Lake Skadar that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:44, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Zog I of Albania
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Zog I of Albania that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Векочел (talk) 01:23, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Markos Botsaris has an RfC
Markos Botsaris, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Jtrrs0 (talk) 12:28, 1 April 2024 (UTC)