Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anglicanism/Assessment

Please use this page to discuss anything relating to the assessment/worklist.

Initial comments
I've created this worklist partially in response to a request from the Version 1.0 Editorial Team to identify "key articles", and it also seems a good way to identify and organise the articles which are important to the topic. This worklist is still in its infancy, and nothing is set in stone. I hope this will encourage discussion of the more important articles, and ways to improve them. In creating this page, I've listed a number of articles as key; some are obvious (Anglicanism), others are less so and I'll mention some of those below.

From my understanding of key articles it seems that this project would have 15 to 25 articles considered of key importance. However, it's possible that my understanding is completely misguided, so that's another topic for discussion! Anyway, I hope that people interested in the project will look this over, discuss, and (most importantly) improve articles. -- Wine Guy  Talk  23:44, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Great worklist. I am fairly new to Wikipedia, but it looks like a lot of work to draw it up.  Might I suggest Anglican doctrine might be a key article?  It is currently a stub - hopefully gaining a bit of focus as a key article or a 'Top importance' article will change that.  --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 22:40, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Instruments of Unity
While creating the initial list of "key articles" it struck me that it would be good to have an article at Instruments of Unity which discusses all four "instruments", and the whole concept and process of unity within the Communion. This article would then be a key article, and Lambeth Conferences, the ACC and Primates' Meeting could be moved down under "Other articles", perhaps under an "Authority" header. The concept of the Instruments of Unity is very important, I'm just not sure that each of the component parts rises to the "key" level. (The Archbishop of Canterbury, IMHO, is a key article regardless.) Any thoughts? -- Wine Guy  Talk  00:31, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Assessment in Project Banner
I note that most of the rest of the projects which engage in assessments do so through their project banners. Personally, I find it much easier to work assessments in that way. Would the members of this project want to include the assessment criteria in the project banner as well? Badbilltucker 19:10, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * This is now available! — PMJ 16:23, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

WP:Anglican's assessment of Bath Abbey
Hello there! I think the time for re-assessment has come: I have just completed a major rewrite of the article.--Vox Humana 8' 15:26, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Potential assessments
I have originally created Sermons of Dean Swift and Sermons of Lawrence Sterne to fill in a gap in the collected works of these authors. Both were 18th century Anglicans. I have far more to add to the Lawrence Sterne page, but I will have to hold off until tomorrow. My talk page can be used for comments, criticism, suggestion, etc. Thanks. Ottava Rima (talk) 20:25, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Anglican Church in North America
Was marked as low-importance; is it perhaps time for an upgrade to "mid"? Chonak (talk) 19:49, 17 April 2009 (UTC)