Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Animals/Assessment

Which articles to access
Because there are so many articles that fall within the spectrum of WP:ANIMALS decedent projects, I think we should try to keep our focus on the articles that don't fall within a decedent projects scope, at least when it comes to the project banner and assessments. So I propose the only articles we should assess are articles that don't fall into the following taxa (and below) unless they are considered Top or High importance articles for the Animals WikiProject.


 * Phylum: Arthropoda
 * Subphylum: Vertebrata
 * I believe all of lower taxa are covered by WP:MAM, WP:BIRDS or WP:AAR but Vertebrata itself is not.
 * Class: Gastropoda
 * Class: Cephalopoda

 J. Hall  • ( Talk ) 18:40, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Turbellaria
Would anyone like to re-assess Turbellaria - I think it's better than stub-class now. --Philcha (talk) 23:19, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅. It looks like a C-class now. OhanaUnitedTalk page 13:46, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Finncattle
Please asses/reassess Finncattle, I expanded it. Pitke (talk) 11:06, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Seeking assessment of updated article
Hey there,

I would appreciate it if someone could conduct an assessment on an article I have been working on for an education course. The article is White-nosed saki. I have been working on it for weeks and would love for someone to check it out for me. I have already added this Wikiproject's template to the talk page but haven't yet had it assessed.

Thanks in advance!

Vikster28 (talk) 07:40, 12 May 2022 (UTC)