Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy/Mars task force/Archive 2

Name
Uh, maybe you should just do WikiProject Mars? This seems a little specific, walk before you run.--HereToHelp 13:25, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * There are still a lot of relevent articles --GW_Simulations 18:18, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I dont see the point, the list articles seem to give enough encyclopedic information necessary. Maybe wait until we colonize mars and your great, great grandchildren can start on such a project. &#150; Tutm&oslash;sis   (Talk)  17:21, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Firstly, many articles haven't been created yet, and secondly, more can be added.
 * The only thing to add to the lists, I would suggest is coordinates. &#150; Tutm&oslash;sis   (Talk)  17:22, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I was going to suggest that that came under location. That way, it doesn't matter if exact co-ordinates are unknown. --GW_Simulations 18:18, 24 April 2006 (UTC)


 * If an article isn't featured, it can still use work. Even if it is featured, it can use work. So start with just Mars (which is not featured). You're thinking too small.--HereToHelp 20:48, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

An excellent source of information on Martian geography is the well researched trilogy of novels by Kim Stanley Robinson, Red Mars, Green Mars, and Blue Mars. Rick Norwood 21:21, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Thoughts
First, I don't think this is thinking too small. Mars as a topic is enormous: probes, in culture etc. Limiting this too geography is a good idea.

The first thing that needs doing is deciding on a uniform system of longitude. I think we should go with 0-360°, East only, as this seems to be the way of the future. Google Mars, perhaps unfortunately, has decided to use 0-180°, East and West both. I would like opinions here as I've started four articles in two days and want to be sure I'm doing what others will do. Note if you have a west coordinate, simply subtract it from 360 and turn it into east.

Also, I've added Category:Terrae on Mars and a List of Terrae on Mars, derived from Google Mars. These are the large regions on Mars.

One general question, as well: is it best to have thousands of stubs, or larger articles absorbing many simple objects? Google Mars, for instance, has 800+ craters listed. Do we need an article for every one? If not, what do we do instead? Marskell 16:00, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Good Question. I'm not entirley sure - it's down to the editor really. Personally, I prefer stubs, but others prefer to go into more detail. I think that a combination of the two would make for a more effective project (someone to create stubs, someone else to fill them out. --GW_Simulations 18:39, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Image Problem with Template
While adding the crater template to Endurance (crater), I noticed that the image would be pushed to the left and the text beneath to the right. Someone care to investigate and/or fix the problem? -- Riffsyphon1024 09:01, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * After using the mountain template, the images centered fine in them, but the crater template continues to boggle me. -- Riffsyphon1024 09:47, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah, found and fixed the problem. It was lacking the colspan=2 align=center| code to center the image properly. Should have known all along. -- Riffsyphon1024 09:50, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Similar Project
I've been working on a similar project to have an article for all named featured on Saturn's moon Enceladus. I completed that project last year, but the templates on this wikiproject's main page has given me great ideas for these Enceladus articles. I have ported the templates to work for Enceladus (see Sarandib Planitia for an example). It was suggested above that perhaps this should be made Wikiproject Mars, but perhaps this could go the other way, and made into Wikiproject ...Solar System Geography (or something similar). Certainly the templates used for this project could be made more general (by removing the category line in the templates) so they can be used for named features on other worlds. --Volcanopele 19:19, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree. This shouldn't be limited to Mars, though it has the most features of any one planet or moon besides Earth. But we could make Mars a subproject of a Solar System Wikiproject, if the creator of this project agrees. -- Riffsyphon1024 04:03, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Btw, very cool that you are on the Cassini Imaging Team itself. An added bonus in the land of Wikipedia. -- Riffsyphon1024 04:15, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

A template
Now that the vandals have disappeared for the time being, it's time to consider whether or not to have a project template, much like the ones here that we could stick on the talk pages of our better articles. I would like ideas for icons and whether we should accept the boilerplate wording or not. MER-C 07:41, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Done, see User:MER-C/Martian Geography. MER-C 10:40, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

I plan on starting tagging on the weekend, so this is the last opportunity (no pun intended) to raise any concerns. MER-C 12:00, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

All done. MER-C 03:52, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Martian Geography???
This whole project is based on assumption that geography means the study of places, which is not. Geography is actualy study of Earth. "Geo" means Earth, so the term Martian Geography is actually misnomer.
 * Yeah, but "Wikiproject Areography" is somewhat obscure because not everyone knows what "areography" is. Martian Geography is unambigious to the uninitiated. (P.S. I encourage you to join - most of the time there's nobody here except when there aren't vandals for me to whack). MER-C 12:15, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Areology was a new term to me until I saw it in use here. So it might be worth keeping geography for the time being. -- Riffsyphon1024 16:21, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * While "Martian Geography" may technically be a misnomer, there really isn't a suitable alternative in common usage. In planetary sciences, terms such as geography and geology, while technically refering to the Earth in the etmology of their names, have taken on a more generic connotation: Geology refering to surfical processes, and geography refering to the study of places. --Volcanopele 18:59, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * How many of those who use geometry on a daily basis around the world actually make calculations that have anything to do with the Earth? In most cases they are measuring the dimensions of buildings or objects - not the Earth. The 'geo' prefix simply refers to the historical roots of the given field of science. --AndersFeder (talk) 20:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Martian Geography vs. Geography of Mars vs. Areography
it's been suggested that Talk:Areography that we move the page to Geography of Mars.. it seems like a reasonable idea, as per Naming conventions. thoughts? (discuss here) Mlm42 11:36, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Simply redirect from "Geography of Mars" to "Aerography" - then people will become educated about the term, which is entering popular usage. shaunmoss

Stub sorting
Why not create specialty stubs for mars like "MarsCrater stub," "MarsMountain stub," “MarsValley stub,” & “MarsWhatever stub?” As opposed to individually tagging each and every mars crater stub with “mars stub” & “crater stub.”--aceslead 22:02, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The best way to do it (I think) would be to make mars-stub a subcategory of crater-stub. There's also a few Saturnian and Jovian stubs thrown in there too, perhaps a couple more stub types? MER-C 12:45, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Are you going to use Category:Martian craters and Category:Martian crater stubs any more? If not, tag them with db-g7. And any new stub types must be OKed by WikiProject Stub sorting. MER-C 13:03, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Are there any other page i created and then forgot about?--aceslead 19:56, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I encountered a problem when creating the .  I didn’t change anything.  Weird.  The articles are still in the  and  .  Any thoughts?--aceslead 20:00, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Did you check in with WP:WSS about this? if so, could you point me to the discussion? Notice that isn't just for craters.. it's for any astrogeological feature.. but it seems you have made  just for Mars craters? in any case, make sure you've gone through the procedure here. Mlm42 08:06, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

The stub discussion is here. It wasn't proposed. MER-C 11:37, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Project directory
Hello. The WikiProject Council has recently updated the WikiProject Council/Directory. This new directory includes a variety of categories and subcategories which will, with luck, potentially draw new members to the projects who are interested in those specific subjects. Please review the directory and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope that all the changes to the directory can be finished by the first of next month. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. B2T2 23:30, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Category:Martian stubs is up for renaming
The proposed new name is Category:Mars stubs. Please voice your opinion here. MER-C 10:28, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

*SUPPORT--aceslead 20:16, 8 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Uhh, what I meant by "here" was Stub types for deletion/Log/2006/November/7. MER-C 08:06, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Next time make it clear that you should go to this "LINK".--aceslead 18:18, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Olympus Mons
Hello, I just nominated the Olympus Mons article for the Article Creation and Improvement Drive because I think that that article deserves to be class A. I thought this nomination might be of some interest to you all. Thanks! S.dedalus 06:38, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Working link. I was thinking about nominating Eagle crater and possibly Valles Marineris but haven't got around to doing it since there's still some 850 potential moon stubs for me to tag, articles I want to create, vandals I want to whack and a whole new load of dead ends I want to prod. MER-C 07:47, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Areography
The happy changing from an to Geology of Mars is back on the agenda! Lets try to get it clear or do a voting or what ever: Areography as a term has no history and is not used in the science! Is ther anybody who can find a article stating areography is geography of mars? If this is the case we will change it back, but the first discussion yielded nothing and I do not think there will be any proof for Areography being something else than the distribution of animals over a certain area. --Stone 09:35, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * A quick Google search for areography throws up some related stuff. I also remember seeing in the compact (ahem) Oxford dictionary and saw the Martian definition. Here's Wiktionary's definition. There's 8 ghits on various NASA websites. It is borderline compared to the non-notable neologisms I deal with over at AFD.


 * However I searched through the various Journals of Geophysical Research including JGR-Planets, where most of the Mars related scientific papers get posted and found zippo. There's also zilch on the open access Mars Journal and the MSSS website.


 * Geography of Mars is a lot less ambigious and more user friendly, though. MER-C 10:35, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I put some literatur on the talk page of Geography of Mars which show that already biology claims the word. I found nowhere a good source, and because of that the Geography should stay Geography. The template contains the Areology and should also chnaged to Geography of Mars.--Stone 17:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Areology is the same problem, but there is no claim from biology!--Stone 18:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Roughly the same story, but this one seems to be more prominent: 0 mentions in JGR; 0 ghits at the Mars Journal, 0 ghits at MSSS, 55 ghits at NASA, 10,500 ghits, defined at Wiktionary.


 * I found this (file type warning: .doc) though. MER-C 05:24, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Oblate Mars
Could someone knowledgeable have a look at the new article Oblate Mars and decide what to do with it? By Googling "figure of Mars" I see that there's plenty of research to cover. Melchoir 00:33, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia Day Awards
Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 16:50, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

proposed move of "Areology" to "Geology of Mars"
I have proposed that "Areology" be moved to "Geology of Mars". Please comment on the talk page of this topic. Lunokhod 17:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Basin Groups article proposed for deletion.
I have proposed the Basin Groups article for deletion. Please leave your opinion at the appropriate page. Lunokhod 11:11, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Small craters on Mars
According to the planetary nomenclature, small craters on Mars are named after towns on Earth with a population of less than 100,000. But how come many craters are named after towns with a much larger population? Examples of this are Amsterdam, Bordeaux, Bremerhaven, Bristol, Cadiz, Cairns, Canberra, Charleston, Innsbruck, Johannesburg, Kaliningrad, Madrid, and so forth. Were they named after these cities before the 100,000 rule was created? Or is one rule missing from the article? Is this a large group of exceptions, or is the information incorrect? A ecis Brievenbus 11:49, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Rename project to just Mars?
Does anyone think that it would be a good idea to rename this project from "martian geography" to "mars"? It seems to me that there probably should be a more general "Mars" project page like that of the Moon. Perhaps "martian geography" should be separate, even if such a project existed, dunno. Lunokhod 13:09, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * agree to that, probably best just to start WikiProject Mars up and leave this project as it is sbandrews 18:59, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * it's quiet round here, rather than wait, I just went and made the page, contributions welcome :) sbandrews 16:06, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I think that it would be easiest if we just merge this project into Mars. In this way, we only have to make minor changes to the user box and project banner. The discussion on project reoganization (see link at top of page) appears to have reached the same consensus. Perhaps you would like to inform the memeber of this group before doing so? I'm a bit busy noe, and am trying to keep my contributions focussed on the Moon at the time being. Lunokhod 10:38, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Caves of Mars Project
Hi guys! I am from WikiProject Abandoned Articles. I was wondering if any of the members from WikiProject Martian Geography would possibly be interested in the article: Caves of Mars Project. This article is currently tagged as Articles which need to be adopted. This is a collaborative effort to improve visitation to abandoned articles. Thanks! Luffy487 13:15, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Martian global warming
Martian global warming is on AFD, and it looks like it will be merged, in case anyone here didn't see it and has an opinion, or would like to help merge it into Mars or Martian atmosphere. Smmurphy(Talk) 02:02, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Already redirected to Climate of Mars. MER-C 07:18, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Reorganization of Space related wikiprojects
I've been thinking about how the Mars and Moon wikiprojects will fit into the Solar System project and have come up with the following suggestions;
 * 1) All discussions on these two talk pages should be redirected to the Solar System talk page in order to help achieve a critical mass.
 * 2) The main Mars and Moon project pages should remain as is. These contain useful information related to these specialized subtopics.
 * 3) The article assessments and project banners should remain as is for the Moon and Mars subprojects. These are useful for those who are interested in tracking health of these respective subdisiplines.
 * 4) If the time comes that the talk page of Solar System becomes overloaded, we can spin off these topics back to the old Mars and Moon talk pages.

Let me know what you think. In about a week I'll make the necessary changes to the Moon talk page. (I am currently alerting the members of Martian Geography to the possibility of renaming this project to just Mars to increase its scope.) Lunokhod 22:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

New intro suggestion for this Wikiproject
Welcome to WikiProject Mars. The purpose of this WikiProject is to create, expand, improve and standardize articles about the planet Mars. This is very much a work in progress. Experience has shown that traffic on this page is light ;) and so we suggest using the WikiProject Solar System talk page in order to help achieve a critical mass.

regards sbandrews 18:06, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

New page
Started new page at WikiProject_Mars as per discussion above... sbandrews 22:30, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * If you are moving pages, you should use the move tab at the top of the page, rather than just using the cut-and-paste method. I've listed the new page for speedy deletion under CSD-G6, and I will move the old page when the new one is gone (unless the admin does it for me). -- GW_SimulationsUser Page 22:34, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Ok, but I kind of wanted to leave this one here, so any users who don't log on regularly can still find us - heaven knows it's quiet enough round here :), how is it best to handle that?, thanks for your help... regards sbandrews 22:40, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Ahhh, a move tab, hadn't seen that before, guess I should have read the instructions. sbandrews 22:42, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Basically, the article and talk page that you created are deleted, then this article and talk page are moved in to replace them, taking the page histories, and leaving behind redirects. -- GW_SimulationsUser Page 22:48, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

article assessments
I've change the banner WPSS for the Solar System wikiproject to include a Mars=yes option; this could handle the Mars article assessments.. i've also created the neccessary category, like Category:B-Class Mars articles, etc, to replace the old Category:B-Class Martian geography articles. I hope that's okay.. I haven't told the User:WP 1.0 bot yet, so it won't update statistics; but does it sound like a good plan to replace the old Martian Geography banner with the new WPSS one? (i.e. use ) Mlm42 20:05, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Sounds fine to me, sbandrews (t) 21:03, 12 March 2007 (UTC) sbandrews (t) 20:22, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It still does not have the functionality of the old one, and hence I'm not doing anything until it's fixed. MER-C 10:38, 13 March 2007 (UTC)


 * yes, this idea is being put on hold, since it was proposed to merge the Solar System, Space exploration, and Astronomy banners into a WPSpace banner. first i'll see what people think about that idea before moving forward. Mlm42 16:02, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Martian geography to Mars
I just updated template:WPMars so that all references to Martian geography are changed to Mars, and edited the Category:WikiProject Mars page so it doesn't show up as a red link. sbandrews (t) 23:36, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

mars features local maps
if anyone needs to produce a topographic map of certain martian surface feature (like this of Isidis Planitia) you can write your suggestion on my talk page – i will try to do it as soon as i have some free time (~ in few days). --PowerCS 13:43, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * ok, first maps done – you can check in Spirit rover & Opportunity rover articles. --PowerCS 15:47, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

I don't know what to do with this article
Especially in light of Transit of Phobos from Mars and Transit of Deimos from Mars being better articles. I'm thinking of converting to a disambig or deletion but I'm not too sure. Please give me some ideas. Thanks. MER-C 12:58, 29 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I've turned it into the skeleton of an overview article, how does that look? It's sort of disambiguaty, but with more meat on it. I think it could do well in this form. Bryan Derksen 07:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Seems OK for the time being, though it needs some sources and incoming links. MER-C 09:00, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Coordinate template
I've hacked up a coordinate template similar to the one seen on terrestrial locations. It's over here. The hard part is getting something meaningful out of the USGS Astrogeology mapbook... MER-C 12:30, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. I'll go and inform WP:GEO. MER-C 11:15, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppurtunity to create New Article on terminology of life on other planets (NOT LITTLE GREEN MEN!)
Organisms on Mars are referred to as Martian. What are organisms (e.g bacteria) on the other planets referred to as?

I have often been curious about this, Wikipedia only cites Jovian as life on Jupiter. Where can the OFFICIAL information be found?

I may have heard the terms Venetian (Venus), Plutonian (Pluto) and Neptunian (Neptune) used in various books. However on Wikipedia none are mentioned and the latter is referred to only as a fictional race in Futurama!

I am just curious for myself, although other people might be as well. So this could be a good opportunity for a Wikipedia user who is knowledgable in Astronomy and Grammer, to perhaps create an article/list or contribute this information to other articles.

Please could you let me know if anyone decides to do this as I would be most interested, thankyou. Ryan4314 05:44, 30 April 2007 (UTC)


 * For those who are interested, the answers to this question can be found here, thanks to Kotra. Ryan4314 03:20, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Featured picture nom
Of Endurance crater. See Featured picture candidates/Mars Endurance. I'm abstaining because there is a significant chance that I'll have to close the nom. MER-C 10:32, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Image scroll
I am excited that Wikipedia finally has a feature that allows the user to scroll across a large image without it taking up room on the article or stretching off the side. This use for the MER rover panoramas is perfect. -- Riffsyphon1024 04:29, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Better quality image
I created a better quality image (in my opinion) of. This image is used in Template:Mars_spacecraft. I stored the new version at. I used the original 22e169.blu, 22e169.grn and 22e169.red images from the NASA Viking image archive, converted them to .png, manually removed the noise (and black stripes at the bottom), merged the three files and finally increased the brightness and contract by 20. All this was done in Adobe Photoshop CS2. The colors look a bit different than the old one, but the colors in this picture are not adjusted in any way (unlike the NASA image). I can also upload the merged file without the adjusted brightness/contrast, but that picture is even darker. The new file is like the orginal three files also in the public domain. Please tell me what you think. Van der Hoorn 20:25, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Due to a mistake I uploaded the original file at Image:22e169.png (removed). Compare it with Image:Mars_Viking_22e169.png to notice the difference in brightness/contrast. Van der Hoorn 20:30, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

interesting
well, not as big as WikiProject Earth could be, but in the future this might be sooo big. I'm joining. -- Andersmusician  VOTE  18:50, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Quadrangles - anyone want to use them?
I just did a major bit of work on List of quadrangles on Mars, since I finally found a source that provided a comprehensive list of the quadrangles and their borders. Then, as a lark, I created a template that takes latitude and longitude as parameters and spits out the name of the quadrangle that point is in. User:Bryan Derksen/Template sandbox and four sub-templates contain it all. I was thinking this might be handy for subcategorizing geological features by region; just stick something like in an article and poof, it's in the right category. We subcategorize every star by constellation, this doesn't seem much different. Any interest? Bryan Derksen 09:18, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * And on Earth, we do ___blank___ by country, so I don't see any problems. We'd also need something like Category:Martian quadrangles. MER-C 12:09, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I'm all geared up to actually implement this now. I've created Template:Mars quadrangle, which is a general-purpose template for converting coordinates into quadrangle names (took longer than I expected since the input coordinates could be in east or west longitude) and I've standardized Template:MarsGeo-Crater so that it has coordinates in an easily-digestable form. All I need to do now is click the two templates together. Any last-minute suggestions or objections before I do? My plan was to create subcategories with names along the lines of "Craters of the Noachis quadrangle", but there's only ~70 crater articles currently, so should I keep my focus higher-level than that and just create "Surface features of the Noachis quadrangle" instead? I must confess that this exercise is sort of a proving ground for future work on Category:Craters on the Moon, which has nearly 2000 articles and is IMO in dire need of subcategorization. Hence my focus on Martian craters as the initial target of this. :) Bryan Derksen (talk) 02:56, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Expect the number of features of Mars to continue to rise in the future, especially with more exploration by the Mars Rovers, and the launch of the Mars Science Laboratory, which might shoot for Nili Fossae. This will help immensely during creation of new location articles. -- Riffsyphon1024 (talk) 07:55, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

There, I've done the craters. Since everything's done automatically via template it should be pretty trivial to change from categorizing craters in the generic "surface features of the Foo quadrangle" category to categorizing them in "Craters of the Foo quadrangle" once there are more articles to divvy up. Once I'm confident there aren't any lurking bugs remaining in these templates (and I haven't got any death threats :) I'll start adding mountains and other features as well. Bryan Derksen (talk) 03:10, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

MESUR
MESUR (Mars Environmental Survey) program seems to be missing. 132.205.99.122 22:01, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, there's no need to write a new article. MER-C 04:53, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, MESUR Pathfinder was only one element of the program. So it's still missing. -- 132.205.99.122 (talk) 20:05, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The redirect can stay for the time being. But now that the page exists, you can create the article yourself, i.e. sofixit. MER-C 05:43, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Surface features of celestial bodies
categories of Surface features of celestial bodies has been nominated to rename from cat:X on Y to cat:X of Y. See Categories for discussion/Log/2007 December 9 132.205.99.122 (talk) 20:18, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Topography pictures
Hi, I am able to do for your article pictures like Image:Tempe Terra topography map.jpg or others are there. If you want some special picture or you are in hurry with it, just writte me to my discussion and I will do it for you. If not, I am trying slowly make all articles with this kind of picture but it will take a lot of time :] --Chmee2 (talk) 00:01, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

International Year of Astronomy 2009
2009 has been proclaimed as the International Year of Astronomy. It would be great to tie in with this, both to help with the aims of the international year and to spur extra improvements to Wikipedia's coverage of astronomy. I've started a thread about this over at WikiProject Astronomy; please have a look and join in with the conversation. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:42, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Mars hoax
Have just created an article on the Mars hoax of 2003, mabye it should be integrated into the Mars article or another article. Davido321 (talk) 08:03, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme
As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
 * The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
 * The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
 * A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot  ( Disable )  20:55, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Mars
Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:14, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Nomenclature
How about a standard naming for articles on Martian features? For instance, one article is named "Eberswalde (crater)", another one is "Holden (Martian crater)". Why not normalize on something like "Eberswalde (Mars)"? That is, the name designated by the IAU (per http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/jsp/SystemSearch2.jsp?System=Mars) followed by "(Mars)". AndersFeder (talk) 20:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, we have a standard - the one you describe initially. The "Martian crater" ones are craters that share names with other craters in the solar system (e.g. Schiaparelli (Martian crater)/Schiaparelli (lunar crater)). I wouldn't change anything because currently it is obvious to anyone from the title of the article what it is about. MER-C 10:13, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Observed snowfall on Mars
NASA Phoenix Lander has observed snowfall on Mars, this info needs to be worked in on Climate on Mars and the climate section on Mars. See for more info. --Jonte-- (talk) 21:56, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

May I destroy?
May I make a redirect page of the article Planetary Database System? The reason is here: Talk:Planetary Database System. Said: Rursus (☻) 16:35, 17 December 2008 (UTC)