Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry/Peer review

Simultaneous peer review at Peer review
Since the peer review is getting quite positive use from members of the chemistry wikiproject, I'm including it at Peer review. There is no fork. Comments from editors approaching these articles from here or WP:PR will edit one single copy, so don't worry. --Rifleman 82 18:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


 * This is much better done by transclusion. Meaning, if the person seeking comment wants to cross post to WP:PR, then should be transcluded here. A best practice would also to add a link WikiProject Chemistry/Peer review on the subpage. --mav (talk) 04:33, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Actually, it is done by transclusion, just the other way around. But I do see your point. Perhaps when we have other peer reviews in the future.--Rifleman 82 (talk) 08:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Time to retire this page?
Regular PRs can be categorized as natsci and Chem PR hasn't been used in months. Therefore I think this page is now redundant and no longer needed. What does anybody else think? If nobody responds saying that this page should be retained, then I will archive its contents and retire it in one month or sometime afterward. --mav (talk) 21:58, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree it should be retired. Having multiple peer reviews processes causes confusion IMO, and this one languishes because it is not as well-known as the general peer review process. --Itub (talk) 09:26, 28 July 2008 (UTC)