Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cooperatives/Archive 2

Anyone interested in working on Social Entrepreneurship?
Looks like this project hasn't been too active recently. Is anyone still around an interested in working on improving social entrepreneurship? I think there are some pages in the wrong category and I've already moved some but would like to get more feedback before moving any inappropriately and maybe work with some others.

I know this project is about Cooperatives but they share a lot in common with the spirit of Social Entrepreneurship. RayScript (talk) 20:50, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * can you please give an example of what you see, and where you want feedback?  Blue Rasberry   (talk)  21:19, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * For example, Solano Avenue Stroll has the social entrepreneurship category. I can see someone arguing that it's related to social entrepreneurship but it's a bit of a stretch. Would it make more sense to categorize it social enterprises instead or just remove the tag all together.
 * Would it make sense to move Ashoka Fellows‎ to be a subcategory under Social entrepreneurs‎?
 * Also thinking might make sense to create a new subcategory for the organizations/funds investing/funding social enterprises since there seem to be so many (Big Society Capital, Bridges Fund Management, Venturesome Fund, Village Capital). Or maybe a more broad category for organizations aimed at promoting social enterprises such as the funds above and New Ventures, Reuters Digital Vision Program, Schwab Foundation for Social Entrepreneurship, UnLtd, etc). The previous lists are not exhaustive.
 * A more general question, what is best practice in terms of who to categorize a social entrepreneur? Is it best if it's self-described or just that they match the definition? I ask because I noticed the List of social entrepreneurs has many people listed who aren't tagged as Social Entrepreneurs.
 * Look forward to seeing your thoughts! RayScript (talk) 21:54, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The body of text on the Stroll article seems to contain no claim describing it as "Social Entrepreneurship". Categories should come from text and sources in the body of the article. When the claim and citation is absent, remove the category.
 * Yes, for as long as Category:Social entrepreneurs means "people doing Social Entrepreneurship", then subcategories of people should be subcategories there, not in the main category.
 * I think the top level category of Category:Social entrepreneurship should exist to cover the topics connected to the main article, Social entrepreneurship. For all the subcategories, I think they should use conventional terms rather than the terms of this field. For example, instead of Category:Social enterprises, there could be Category:Social enterprise funds, Category:Social enterprise companies and Category:Social enterprises nonprofit organizations, or whatever is conventional to categories organizations in Wikipedia. I say to use the conventional names because it seems like this field makes up special names which other fields would just call "company" or whatever. The point of Wikipedia categories is to be understood, and we can change the language to achieve that goal.
 * As with 1, if the text of the article has no claim, then remove the category. If the text has the claim then use the category.
 * Thoughts?  Blue Rasberry   (talk)  18:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much for the responses :) These were all very helpful. I'm still thinking about how to organize number 3 but as for the rest knowing that the categories should come from article content was a big help. I'm slowly going through and organizing some of the social entrepreneurs to make sure they have the right categories. RayScript (talk) 20:18, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * you are welcome, thanks for editing the wiki  Blue Rasberry   (talk)  21:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much for the responses :) These were all very helpful. I'm still thinking about how to organize number 3 but as for the rest knowing that the categories should come from article content was a big help. I'm slowly going through and organizing some of the social entrepreneurs to make sure they have the right categories. RayScript (talk) 20:18, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * you are welcome, thanks for editing the wiki  Blue Rasberry   (talk)  21:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * you are welcome, thanks for editing the wiki  Blue Rasberry   (talk)  21:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Systematic To-Do List To Create a Foundation For A Comprehensive Wikibooks About Cooperatives
So I have been thinking about starting to write to Wikipedia about cooperatives systematically, in a way that will enable eventually to make the content into a Wikibooks about cooperatives. Here is the first sketch of the book, and some key missing chapters:

Co-operatives A Wikibooks project for a collaboratively written, regularly updated and expanded text book about the cooperative movement.

Cooperatives In Europe

 * Cooperative Movement In Britain
 * Cooperative Movement In Denmark

Cooperatives In Asia

 * Cooperatives In India

Cooperatives in North America

 * Cooperatives In The United States
 * Cooperatives In Canada

Consumer cooperatives

 * Cooperative banking
 * Credit unions
 * Cooperative banks
 * Building societies
 * Mutual insurance companies
 * Retail cooperatives
 * Utility cooperatives
 * Water cooperatives
 * Electricity cooperatives
 * Telephone cooperatives
 * Purchasing cooperatives

Producer cooperatives

 * Worker cooperatives
 * Forestry cooperatives
 * Dairy cooperatives

Other

 * Multi-stakeholder cooperatives
 * Platform cooperatives

Move discussion
Hi WP Cooperatives, I was wondering if anyone would like to offer an opinion on a discussion taking place at Talk:Autonomous_social_center. Thanks for any comments! Mujinga (talk) 14:42, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Invitation to US Housing Edit-a-thon
Please join us on 13 December 2020, 12:00-14:00 EST, as we update and improve articles in Wikipedia related to housing in the United States of America. Sign up here. -- M2545 (talk) 11:18, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Category:Cooperatives articles needing expert attention has been nominated for discussion
Category:Cooperatives articles needing expert attention has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 07:05, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

User script to detect unreliable sources
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like and turns it into something like
 * John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
 * John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from cite web, cite journal and doi.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)