Wikipedia talk:WikiProject District of Columbia

Discussion at Content assessment
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Content assessment, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. &#x0020;This WikiProject received this message because it currently uses "Current" and/or "Future" class(es). There is a proposal to split these two article "classes" into a new parameter "time", in order to standardise article-rating across Wikipedia (per RfC), while also allowing simultaneous usage of quality criteria and time for interest projects. Thanks! &#8212;CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 21:49, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Relevant categorization discussion
See Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_January_12 for discussion of including the District along with states and territories in category schemes. ―Justin ( koa v f ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

DC Tech article
I've submitted two drafts on DC Tech and its history - while the first draft needed some work, most recently my submission was denied in a driveby review for reference/notability by a deleted user/bot. I've looked at Wikipedia's articles about Technology Clusters and would say "DC Tech" is now in the top 25% in both notability and article quality. The current re-review queue is 2 months long. Can someone help me get this accepted? Caywood (talk) 04:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Mary McLeod Bethune
Mary McLeod Bethune has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 04:19, 12 July 2024 (UTC)