Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Drag Race/Archive 8

Access All Areas (EP)
Does anyone know how to add all the EP and song chart positions to this article? (See also: The AAA Girls)

Pinging in case you're interested/available. Thanks either way! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:26, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

RuPaul's Drag Race UK (series 3)
Starting to collect sources for UK series 3 at Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race UK (series 3). Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:32, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

All Stars, season 6!

 * RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars (season 6)

--- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:37, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * + new stub for Ra'Jah O'Hara --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:52, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

BTW, not sure if she qualifies for a page yet, but I see Serena ChaCha is the only contestant without an entry. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:30, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I looked for standalone sources hoping to start an article and there's really not much out there. If someone makes a stub on her I doubt it'll be kept at this point. --Kbabej (talk) 03:43, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , Ok, thanks! Best to keep the redirect for now, though perhaps there will be more soon given her upcoming appearance. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 03:46, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Ongoing discussion(s)
Project members may want to check out the discussions at Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race UK (series 2). I'm struggling to follow the whole thing, but at the bottom I've started a new thread referencing an above discussion on this Talk page. Additional feedback/ideas welcome if you want to weigh in about possible ways forward. Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:29, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

The Switch Drag Race
I finally got around to splitting The Switch Drag Race into The Switch Drag Race (season 1) and The Switch Drag Race (season 2). I've also updated Template:RuPaul's Drag Race appropriately. Further improvements to any of these pages are welcome. Also, another editor asked a couple questions at Talk:The Switch Drag Race if any project members care to weigh in. Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:17, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Pupi Poisson
New stub: Pupi Poisson --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:39, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * ... nominated for deletion. I guess some editors have forgotten how to redirect or share concerns on article talk pages... --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:37, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

User:Another Believer
Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents --92.28.190.117 (talk) 16:56, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * But I haven't decided on my werk room entrance catch phrase yet...! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:02, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Collaboration of the Month: August 2021
Ayo, sis! The Collaboration of the Month for August 2021: Drag Race Holland (season 2) --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 04:35, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Template:DragRaceProgressTable nominated for deletion
Template:DragRaceProgressTable has been nominated for deletion. Discussion participation welcome. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 12:25, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Alphabetizing names for Queens
Is there a good way of determining whether a Drag queens name should be sorted based on the full name or as if it was a First and Last Name? On one end of the Scale there is Victoria "Porkchop" Parker who is sorted with "P" (for Parker, not Porkchop) and for the other Delta Work, who is sorted under D. I felt the topic was a little broad for WP:RPDR and a little narrow for WP:LGBT, so I flipped a coin and decided to put it here. (and for additional confusion, which way should Monica Beverly Hillz be sorted: M, B or H?) (And I think I remember one queen on RPDR who actually competed under their legal name)Naraht (talk) 18:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * My understanding from Category talk:RuPaul's Drag Race contestants was that we should go by full name, but I could be mistaken., care to chime in? Armadillo  pteryx  23:20, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , Yes, full name. But there are some exceptions, no? Such as Kameron Michaels and Derrick Barry? -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:24, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * It seems like we do that in practice, so how do we describe the guideline? Sort by full name unless we have RS stating either that the surname is a legal surname or that the person has identified it as a surname (e.g. in the case of Kameron)? Armadillo  pteryx  01:17, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , Yes? A bit clunky but seems about right. Is this part of a larger manual of style discussion or something? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:26, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * No, I was just remembering this :-p I don't believe there's been a substantial discussion on it. Armadillo  pteryx  01:43, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , Yes!, agreed. I guess that was more a question for Naraht. Curious why the issue was raised. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:46, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * because I noticed that the Category:English Drag Queens was "out of order", and then went looking at the American version and noticed that it was sorted differently than the RPDR cat.Naraht (talk) 03:57, 18 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Just noticed that in Lady Gaga's article (which is FA-class), the prose uses "Gaga" like a surname throughout, though it is obviously not a last name at all. I wonder if the encyclopedia could benefit from clearer guidance on cases like this, as it would seem relevant to stage names in general (and probably other forms of "adopted" name), not just drag names. Armadillo  pteryx  20:32, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Beyond RPDR
While the RPDR queens are sorted in the Category:RuPaul's Drag Race contestants entirely by the full text of the name (minus the Mrs. in Mrs. Kasha Davis), does this apply to non RPDR categories like Category:American drag queens where it feels more hit and miss.Naraht (talk) 23:42, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , You're right, does become more complicated. Hard for me to justify sorting people by fake "last names", though. For example, I cannot image searching for Detox Icunt under "I" for "Icunt". --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:31, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

UK tours
Lawrence_Chaney shows there are several RPDR-related tours in the UK. Not sure if any of these qualify for Wikipedia entries, but we have several articles for similar US/international tours. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:05, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Television has an RFC
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Television, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:58, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * This RFC is worth a look. One possible outcome is the deletion of hundreds or thousands of contestant progress tables project-wide. – Novem Linguae (talk) 01:01, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Countries' consistency in the RPDR template
New discussion at Template Talk:RuPual's Drag Race. Contributions are all welcome. Thanks --78.148.25.46 (talk) 06:42, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 July 11 § Template:DragRaceProgressTable/5
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 July 11 § Template:DragRaceProgressTable/5. – Novem Linguae (talk) 03:44, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Serena Chacha?
Only one queen who has done All Stars has no article. Is Serena Chacha notable?Naraht (talk) 11:26, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , I've not completed research or assessed sourcing, but Kbabej didn't think so here. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:17, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanx, should have looked at the rest of the page... :( But glad someone looked and Serena certainly didn't make it easier by doing well in AS6...Naraht (talk) 19:49, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Update: See Serena ChaCha --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:57, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Lemon
New stub! Lemon (drag queen) --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 12:51, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Elektra Shock
Project members are invited to help expand Elektra Shock, which was created by an unregistered user and redirected, but possibly worth saving. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:20, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Luz Violeta
Luz Violeta has been redirected twice. Project members are invited to please help improve sourcing, thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Sederginne
Page for https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sederginne on nl-wiki. Page not yet created in en-wiki
 * See Sederginne. Improvements welcome! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:10, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Canada's Drag Race, Season 2 queens

 * https://www.bellmedia.ca/the-lede/tv/crave/canadas-drag-race/

I've created redirects for the queens, as noted at Talk:Canada's Drag Race (season 2). Looking forward! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:19, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Janey Jacké at AfD
Janey Jacké has been nominated for deletion. Discussion participation welcome. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:03, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Collaboration of the Month: September
Carmen Farala is the Collaboration of the Month for September. Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:10, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Merge proposal: tongue popping to me merged in Alyssa Edwards
Hi. I have just proposed this merge here Talk:Alyssa Edwards. Contributions are welcome. --92.28.190.117 (talk) 19:39, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Pangina Heals
New stub! Pangina Heals --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:59, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Category for progress tables? Category for Drag Race-related templates in general?
Should we have a category for all of the progress table templates? Should we have a category for Drag Race-related templates in general? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:34, 3 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Seems like a good idea. I don't know what other Drag Race related templates there still are besides the progress tables, though. -- Thijslandsmeer (talk) 09:04, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * @Thijslandsmeer ✅ Update: I've created Category:Drag Race (franchise) templates --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:58, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Carmen Farala
A few notes on the winner of RPDR:España. She doesn't have a page on the English Language Wikipedia, but does have one on Spanish Wikipedia so I have added the interlanguage link template to both the series page and the list of contestants. She should *not* be added to the template until there is an English language page. (And as a note, I'm not completely convinced that the Spanish Wikipedia page as it is would survive an AFD on this wikipedia, but then the English Wikipedia is generally the strictest) Naraht (talk) 13:30, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , Stub created for expansion --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:32, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

RuPaul's Drag Race Down Under (season 1)
G'day, g'day, g'day! Season 2 of Down Under has been announced. I've forked out RuPaul's Drag Race Down Under (season 1) from RuPaul's Drag Race Down Under. Help making these two pages more consistent with similar entries is appreciated! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:45, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Dragging the Classics: The Brady Bunch
Related upcoming Paramount+ special: Dragging the Classics: The Brady Bunch --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 04:49, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

New season rules...
In terms of new pages, we have two different situations: A) A new "country" (Down under and All-stars are "countries") B) A new season of an existing "country". This has two situations, "season 2" (where the only article is "Drag race - Country") and "season 3+"

I'd like to see criteria as to when a new page is created in each situation. I figure that there are a few milestones which get covered by the media that we can use. (not sure this is all of the milestones)
 * 1) Announcement that such a season/country will exist
 * 2) Announcement of some number of judges (obviously this doesn't apply to all-stars, etc)
 * 3) Announcement of casting being open
 * 4) Announcement of filming beginning
 * 5) Announcement that it will air on specific networks
 * 6) Announcement of which queens will be on the season.
 * 7) Announcement of date that the first episode will air.

So which of these is enough to start a new page? (with the understanding that the answer may be different for A) & B).
 * I think a new page can be created once a premiere date is confirmed, but there may be a better answer somewhere at WikiProject Television. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:15, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

==Discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Television § Standardized terms for elimination-style reality program progress tables== You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Television § Standardized terms for elimination-style reality program progress tables. – Novem Linguae (talk) 04:27, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Artwork for RuPaul's Secret Celebrity Drag Race infobox?
Anyone able to add artwork to the RuPaul's Secret Celebrity Drag Race infobox? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:16, 28 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Thijslandsmeer! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:48, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Contributions welcome here
Since this WikiProject is featured in Template:RuPaul's Drag Race, I invite the members to partecipate in this discussion: RuPaul's Drag Race#Template edit suggestion. Thank you 92.28.190.117 (talk) 15:35, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for starting a Talk page discussion. I'm curious to see what other editors think about your proposed changes. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:36, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for you comment Another Believer. Since you reverted my edit, stating that "[you] disagree" in the edit summary, I kindly invite you to partecipate and comment on why you disagree. Thank you --92.28.190.117 (talk) 15:43, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:07, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Please see ongoing discussions related to Template:RuPaul's Drag Race here: Template_talk:RuPaul%27s_Drag_Race. Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:55, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Collaboration of the Month: October 2021: RuPaul's Drag Race UK (series 3)
RuPaul's Drag Race UK (series 3) is the Collaboration of the Month for October 2021.

Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:08, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

List of Canada's Drag Race episodes
Anyone able to expand List of Canada's Drag Race episodes? Seems appropriate now, given a second season is airing. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:14, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

I’ll have a go at expanding the article later today! — Thijslandsmeer (talk) 15:21, 29 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:22, 29 October 2021 (UTC)


 * I think I made a solid start. -- Thijslandsmeer (talk) 19:56, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 05:24, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Drag Race España split?
Since the second season for Drag Race España has been confirmed, is a split for series and season article already needed? If so, I could work on this. -- Thijslandsmeer (talk) 14:48, 2 November 2021 (UTC)


 * @Thijslandsmeer I was planning to wait until the premiere date for Season 2 was announced, but I am not opposed to a split sooner than later. Fork away to Drag Race España (season 1)!! --- Another Believer  ( Talk ) 14:50, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * @Thijslandsmeer Thanks for splitting! Also, you'll want to add Template:Split article to the top of both Talk pages for proper attribution. Let me know if you need help with this. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:31, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Sure thing! -- Thijslandsmeer (talk) 16:39, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Genie
New stub: Genie (drag queen) --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:42, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Scarlet Adams
New stub: Scarlet Adams --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:09, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Art Arya
New stub! Art Arya --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:44, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Charity Kase
New stub: Charity Kase (drag queen) --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:58, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Vanda Miss Joaquim
New stub for Vanda Miss Joaquim (drag queen). Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:19, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Tyra Sanchez
There few sources that Tyra Sanchez is retired from drag. She no longer called called, Tyra Sanchez, he or she. I tried to move her page as James Ross IV or James Ross (entertainer) Sunrise In Brooklyn ✉ 20:39, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , If you're proposing a page move based on sourcing, you'll want to start a move discussion at Talk:Tyra Sanchez. I'd still think most sources refer to the subject as Tyra Sanchez, but I've not done much research here. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) -- Another Believer  ( Talk ) 20:42, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Whether or not the performer is retired doesn't overrule WP:COMMONNAME. Lots of performers are retired, but that doesn't negate the work they've done in the past. --Kbabej (talk) 23:21, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Drag Race Italia
Anyone able to add title card / promotional poster to the Drag Race Italia infobox? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:42, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Resolved, archiving... --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Drag Race Philippines
Drag Race Philippines has been announced! Feel free to share sources at Talk:Drag Race Philippines. Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:07, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Any RPDR queens with "last names" in their drag name.
Right now, almost all of the RPDR queens in Category:RuPaul's Drag Race contestants are sorted there as if their entire drag name was one name without a last name, so, for example, Ivy Winters is sorted under I, not W. There are a *few* examples of queens that are sorted as if part of their drag name was a last name.
 * Tamisha Imam is sorted under Iama
 * Kandy Muse is sorted under Muse
 * Raja O'Hara is sorted under O'Hara


 * Dahlia Sin is sorted under Sin
 * Kylie Sonique Love is sorted under Sonique
 * The Vixen is sorted under Vixen

However...
 * Eureka O'Hara is sorted under Eureka


 * Derrick Barry is sort under D as a Drag Race Contestant by B *everywhere* else (that is their legal name)
 * Brooke Lyn Hytes is sorted under B as a Drag Race Contestant by H *everywhere* else.


 * Victoria "Porkchop" Parker is sorted under V, but in the article, Parker is used as a "last name"
 * Similarly for Cynthia Lee Fontaine, sorted under C, in the article Fontaine is used as a "last name"
 * Similarly Charlie Hides, Mariah Paris Balenciaga and Yuhua Hamasaki

(for even more fun, Jiggly Caliente is sorted under J for DR Contestants and C for AS Contestants, similarly Eureka is sorted under O'Hara in AS Contestants

Does anyone have deas on Consistency (or at least which way we should do the O'Haras)?Naraht (talk) 06:04, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Progress tables across all seasons
On RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars (season 6) I've been noticing a lot of edit warring about HIGH, SAFE and LOW placements in the table. I think such thing has already been discussed on some other Talk page, but since I think this (the tables) is getting hard to manage, I'm putting it here on this Talk page and I think it needs some serious action. In order to adhere to WP:ACCESS, WP:MOS and WP:OR, I would suggest removing the following;
 * Remove the double SAFE placement (white and cornsilk background) in order to get rid of information being conveyed through color only;
 * Remove the LOW and HIGH placement, in order to adhere to WP:OR;
 * Write out "Bottom 2" and "Eliminated" completely, to adhere to WP:ACCESS. Maybe also possible to do something that has already been done in the DragRace template? I'm not sure if this adheres to WP:ACCESS though;
 * Write out what the columns mean, by putting "Episode" on top, instead of just the episode numbers

I tried something for the season 1 table (two examples), but I think this is still a work in progress:

Please leave your opinions, I would like to hear! Thijslandsmeer (talk) 21:04, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Doubling the width of the columns makes the table overflow off the screen for me, and also looks unaesthetic to me. For the cells that are causing the column widths to increase, maybe try a smaller font size. Or, at a TFD recently, someone pointed out that we can just do an abbr and that will comply with accessibility guidelines. Maybe just doing abbr is the simplest solution. – Novem Linguae (talk) 21:42, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * One suggestion I have is to remove the number after "bottom"; usually it's a bottom two, but there have also been bottom threes and even a bottom six. I think the number in the bottom isn't really important in the table; the point is that anyone in the bottom was part of the LSFYL, and the word "bottom" by itself communicates that. The fewer characters, the better.
 * I don't think we need to remove the "high" and "low" placements to adhere to WP:OR; this can be sourced properly (from episodes or recaps). The main source of headache w/r/t this has been IPs/SPAs with their own ideas of who was high/low seem making OR-based disruptive edits (but this, I think, is best dealt with in other ways: either keeping the templates or using semi-protection).
 * I also agree with that narrower column width is better.
 * Perhaps we can look to examples like Top Chef: All-Stars L.A. for other ideas on how to make the tables accessibility-compliant. It looks like also suggested  in a different RPDR article.  Armadillo  pteryx  23:56, 31 July 2021 (UTC)


 * I agree on the use of abbr, also to not have the tables overflow on some screens, although I don't know if this change will make the table adhere to WP:ACCESS. Pinging and  here, as I think they have more knowledge about this than me. Removing the number after "BTM" seems fine to me, especially because you can already see how many contestants were in the bottom that episode. The thing about the HIGH and LOW placements are that there are no set rules about what places a contestant SAFE or not. (Does one negative critique place someone HIGH or SAFE, etc.) Plus, we also need to keep WP:FAN in mind. By just keeping the winner of the episode, the bottom two(/three..) and the eliminated contestant would give sufficient information about the episodes and not make it FANCRUFT. Thijslandsmeer (talk) 05:54, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't have too many objections to your format (some of the colours still have relatively little contrast, so would be hard to read for some colour-blind users), but seems to already have done much of the leg-work, see higher up on this page: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_RuPaul%27s_Drag_Race. If you don't have an issue with those tables you can likely copy/paste them into the relevant articles, ideally with an edit summary like copying table by User:CCamp2013, as per discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject RuPaul's Drag Race [for copyright attribution purposes and for clarity should anybody object to the consensus.]) Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs)  13:01, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I'm fine working on this, still my question remains; is the use of the abbreviation template readable for visually impaired people? This would help with the table width, especially for longer seasons, because these will not fit on everyone's screens. Thijslandsmeer (talk) 15:27, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The template documentation (Template:abbr/doc) has a section about "Accessibility and HTML validity concerns", so you should look there first. Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 17:09, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

This is my final draft for the new progress tables, as the abbr template is readable for the visually impaired readers:


 * The contestant won RuPaul's Drag Race.
 * The contestant was a runner up.
 * The contestant was eliminated in third place (did not compete in final lip sync).
 * The contestant was voted Miss Congeniality by viewers.
 * The contestant won the challenge.
 * The contestant was declared safe.
 * The contestant was in the bottom two.
 * The contestant was eliminated.
 * The contestant returned as a guest for that episode.

I'll make the tables for all of the franchise's seasons in this format and will afterwards update them on the season's pages. Since the DragRaceProgressTable is being discussed for deletion, I will replace the templates on the season's pages themselves. This will probably lead into some edit warring, and maybe semi- or extended confirmed protection will be neccesary for some articles. Thijslandsmeer (talk) 18:13, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your work on this. Fixing the column width thing was my main concern, so I'm happy. You may want to check with some people that know how to run the color blindness tests and make sure the color palette is also accessible. Maybe by making a post at WT:ACCESS or WT:TV? Might as well solve all concerns before we go to the work of mass editing. Also, I wonder if some of this can be easily updated with just a couple of tweaks to the templates. – Novem Linguae (talk) 18:58, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * A simple and usually effective solution is to try it in black and white (see File:Black and white table example.png for an example). If the contrast works fine (and the colours are not entirely undistinguishable) in black and white, it should be ok for partial colour-blidness too. Cheers, — Preceding unsigned comment added by RandomCanadian (talk • contribs)

Isaidnoway's feedback
First, there are varying degrees of visual impairment, so it is not always a "one size fits all" solution for the visually impaired. We should be striving for AA or AAA accessibility. Second, the abbr template is not readable for the visually impaired who use screen readers, it only works when you hover over it with your mouse, as explained here: the objective of this technique is to provide expansions for abbreviations by using the abbr element, like a tooltip. So abbreviations should be spelled out. Third, see MOS:COLOR for color contrast issues, and please also note that color can not be the only method used to communicate important information, as seen at the bottom of the table where color boxes are used, and also using the term "The contestant" means nothing for someone using a screen reader when they have no idea who "the contestant" is because screen readers do not read colors. So that issue will have to be addressed using some other means other than color to convey that information (note that the colored background and color boxes are fine for those with vision, and don't necessarily have to be removed, but those with screen readers need an alternative to receive that information).



The second example table above with the abbreviations spelled out is the most accessibility compliant, which is also similar to (my choice), which is compliant as well (except for the color legends at the bottom}. And while aesthetically pleasing is nice, cute and pretty, more importantly, we should be striving to make sure that our readers and editors with disabilities have access to Wikipedia pages. So you can actually hear what this table (final draft) sounds like being read by my screen reader, I've inclued this audio file if you want to hear what visually impaired readers and editors deal with. Isaidnoway (talk) 01:51, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * UPDATE: - I created an alternative Progress table using the same exact table in the final draft (with no changes to the table itself), but instead of using color boxes, I used the legend template (same colors as the boxes), which the screen reader was able to parse, tweaked the text a little bit, and the abbreviations can be kept as is. Is it OK to post if for opinions? Isaidnoway (talk) 13:06, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Of course! Thijslandsmeer (talk) 13:10, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|BeBe Zahara Benet won RuPaul's Drag Race.}} {{legend|silver|Nina Flowers was the runner-up.}} {{legend|aqua|Nina Flowers was voted Miss Congeniality (Miss C) by viewers.}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the challenge in that episode.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe by the judges in that episode.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant was in the bottom two in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}} {{legend|gainsboro|Guest, indicates that the contestant returned as a guest in that episode.}}

Placing the legend at the top of the table lets the screen reader know up front what each term means in the table, and also identifies the abbreviations up front, so there is no confusion about what they stand for, and additionally, it solves the problem of color being used as the only method to communicate important information. I also left out The contestant was eliminated in third place (did not compete in final lip sync), because I didn't see any contestant that fit that description in this particular table. Thanks for you consideration and opinions. Isaidnoway (talk) 14:44, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

I am 100% in favour of any solution which is both accessible to anyone with screen readers--so all information must be conveyed textually, without relying on colour--and which removes the 'high/low' nonsense that is definitionally OR. Daundelin ❁  17:59, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Is that all that was needed this whole time? To move the legend from the bottom to the top? I am happy to modify every single table and put the legend on the top if it gets people to stop sniping these tables. I don't know why such a simple fix required so much drama. It will take a lot of effort to go through the required 2nd RFCs and deletion reviews to get these sniped tables restored, even after they are accessibility compliant, and I do not appreciate the hornet's nest people have stirred up over this. If you voted delete in the current TFD for accessibility reasons, please consider changing your vote. – Novem Linguae (talk) 20:48, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I think that, apart from moving the legend to the top, the other major change is to use the legend template for the legend (rather than coding the color boxes as in the earlier versions). My understanding from 's comment above is that screen readers parse the legend correctly that way. Armadillo  pteryx  02:50, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing that out. Converting to the legend template is also fine with me. – Novem Linguae (talk) 03:29, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

It seems like the majority of the people agree with this format of the table. I already went ahead and made a majority of these tables in this format two(?) days ago, so I'm fine with making the rest of the tables in this format as well, if we all agree on this. Thijslandsmeer (talk) 11:09, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree only with moving the legend from bottom to top, and converting the legends to use of the legend template. And even that we may want to wait until the survey has run for a few more days. No need to rush on a topic this contentious. I definitely do not agree to changing BTM2, HIGH, or LOW yet, nor to any other changes I have not mentioned. – Novem Linguae (talk) 11:58, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Ok but the highs and lows are not original research. Most of the time the show very clearly deliniates who is in the top of the week and who is in the bottom of the week, thus the queens who place in the HIGH and LOW are given to us by production. 9 times out of 10 it's not just fan conjecture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DARealityTV (talk • contribs)

Survey on legend placement
Just double checking before I go mass editing these tables. Should RPDR tables have the legend moved from after the table to before the table, to help users with screen readers? – Novem Linguae (talk) 20:48, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Support. Seems like an easy thing we can do to make these tables more accessible. – Novem Linguae (talk) 20:48, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Support. Fine by me. It's a neutral change for users who don't use screen readers and a positive change for those that do. Armadillo  pteryx  00:52, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Support a no-brainer, doesn't really negatively impact anybody but actually makes it easier for some. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:51, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Support Seems obvious to me that doing this only improves things. Thijslandsmeer (talk) 11:01, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Survey on removing high/low
This didn't seem quite as well supported, so making it a separate issue. Should RPDR tables have all high and low squares converted to safe squares, to satisfy concerns about original research? – Novem Linguae (talk) 20:48, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * In the long run, no, as we can source this properly—and, if the tables stay in template form, we can do it once, source it properly, and not have to worry about IPs/SPAs making incessant OR edits to this end. In the immediate short-term, until someone actually goes back through the sourcing to do this, I think it's fine to leave them as just "safe". Armadillo  pteryx  00:53, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * For the record, RS such as Vulture do recaps with clear statements like: Shuga, Silky, and Vanessa are all safe, with Plastique, Brooke, and Yvie occupying the top positions and Nina, Ra'Jah, and A'Keria on bottom.
 * And to address a couple comments below: yes, I've lost my appetite for this WikiProject and don't intend to put much into it in the future. That doesn't mean I can't see existing discussions through to the end or contribute sporadically if I so choose. Armadillo  pteryx  02:30, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes. The high/low stuff is based solely on opinions about whether someone received 'positive' or 'negative' critiques; they are not sourced in any way. The only definitive answers provided by the show are win, bottom (as in lipsyncing), and elimination. The show even states "you are safe" to all but the winning and bottom queens. Daundelin  ❁  05:33, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Not quite. After the judges deliberate, all contestants except the top 3 and bottom 3 are told they're safe and leave the stage immediately, with no critiques at all. The judges then offer positive critiques to the top 3 (declaring one a winner) and negative critiques to the bottom 3 (instructing the bottom 2 to lip sync). Armadillo  pteryx  13:12, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, quite. I watch RPDR religiously and have been doing so since S1 originally aired. Anyone who isn't the winner, and isn't eliminated, is declared safe by RuPaul (Or Brooke, or Supremme, etc). Whether a critique is 'positive' or 'negative' is a matter of opinion, therefore original research, and neither it nor any data derived from those opinions have any place in Wikipedia. The only things the progress tables should show--and that does rather beg the question as to whether the tables are even necessary--is verifiable information from the show. Which means: win/safe/bottom 2/eliminated, and nothing more. Daundelin ❁  15:42, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Not really. Sent offstage immediately as "safe" isn't the same as being kept onstage to receive critiques because you are in the "top" or "bottom"—which any religious watcher of the show would know are terms used within the show and by the judges. The girls who are told "You are safe" right off the bat are clearly not the same as the ones who are told "You represent the tops and bottoms of the week".
 * It's pretty darn easy to source which 6 were left after everyone else left the stage. And out of those, it's obvious which one is the winner, which two lip sync, which one got trivially negative critiques and was almost led to believe they were lip syncing, and which two got a lot of praise but didn't win. Armadillo  pteryx  01:01, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, really. Everyone who doesn't win, and isn't in the bottom two, is explicitly told "you are safe." The other considerations you mention are matters of opinion and interpretation, which is WP:OR. But it appears you've left the project so this is a moot point. Daundelin  ❁  15:30, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I think Armadillopteryx's argument is reasonable. Also, the fact that they have left the WikiProject does not invalidate their argument nor prevent them from posting here again. I'm undecided as of yet, but I can certainly see Armadillopteryx's point of view here. – Novem Linguae (talk) 21:03, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I didn't say their departure invalidated their argument; WP:OR, WP:SYNTH, and WP:V invalidate their argument. Responding to them is what was moot. Daundelin  ❁  16:26, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes If this somewhat isn't pure WP:OR (I'm not convinced by Armadillo's argumentation), it's still interpretation of a primary source (the show itself), which ought to be discouraged. Additionally, as a look through relevant talk pages will show, the inclusion of this leads to continued argumentation between fans of the show (which speaks even more to the fact that this is OR). I'm sorry, but WP isn't a fansite. Not including this will both reduce disruption - already a good reason to do something - as well as bring articles more in line with what encyclopedic content should look like (as described by our content guidelines and policies) - an even better reason, if you weren't already convinced. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:49, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
 * All of this right here, yes. Daundelin  ❁  15:30, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
 * There's not really any "argumentation" here, nor is it something the fandom created. Identifying a week's highs/lows involves no more OR or interpretation of a primary source that identifying the week's winner or lip syncers. The show's format is so regular it follows a formula: In every week with $$n>6$$ contestants, $$n-6$$ are "safe", 3 are "in the top" (1 winner, 2 "high"), and 3 are "in the bottom" (of which 2 lip sync). Sure, there is the odd week (generally, no more than one per season) where some sort of dramatic gag disrupts this, but in those cases, it is clear what happened and why—and recaps in secondary RS document it.
 * As far as disruption goes, so long as the tables remain in template form, there will be virtually no OR-esque edits to deal with at all.
 * All that said, I truly don't care much whether we actually do reintroduce HIGH/LOW in the table. But if we choose to leave them out permanently, it should be for a valid reason, not the false premise that it's OR or fancruft. Armadillo  pteryx  02:15, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Please don't feel the need to reply to every comment. As I said, I'm not convinced by your argumentation, I disagree with your assertion that OR is a false pretense, and you would do well to not bludgeon the process. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 02:20, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I replied to your comment because you named me explicitly. Armadillo  pteryx  02:30, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes: As I already mentioned at the start of this discussion, I think the HIGH/SAFE/LOW placements are definitely WP:OR. Critiques can be interpreted differently by everyone. I agree that on some episodes the placements might be obvious, but there are way too many episodes where this isn't the case, causing edit warring between fans. If results of episodes aren't obvious, and are to be interpreted by viewers, I think the placements shouldn't be included in the "contestant progress" tables. So I think exculding this and only using the "SAFE" placement will resolve this issue. After all, as said before, WP is not a fansite, so by replacing HIGH and LOW with SAFE makes the content of the RPDR articles more encyclopedic. Thijslandsmeer (talk) 14:57, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Exactly. Daundelin  ❁  15:30, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
 * No: For the most part, I think the show does a good job of distinguishing the "high" and "low" placements from regular "safe" placements, and I do think it's helpful to display that information. While I understand that the status of a "high" or "low" placement is not always objective, narritvely the show often does make the distinction quite clear, for example, a queen, with a "low" placement, might mention something in the next episode about almost landing in the bottom 2, or being negatively critiqued, etc. I am somewhat open to the idea of perhaps converting "high" and "low" placements to the type of "safe" that is demonstrated in the current Progress Charts with "The contestant received critiques but was ultimately declared safe". It's not difficult to distinguish between queens who were negatively or positively critiqued and queens were ultimately just called "safe" without any critiques whatsoever, and I do think it's a helpful and useful distinction to provide on the progress charts. Scootersfood (talk) 01:18, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
 * But why would we want to interpret a WP:PRIMARY source when that's exactly what we're not supposed to do, even if "it's not difficult"? (analysing a piece of music isn't difficult if you know what you're doing, either, but we don't base our articles on stuff like Bach's Orgelbüchlein on the analysis of editors) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 02:09, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
 * This, yes. "But WP:OR is fine when we do it here" is kind of an annoying argument tbh. Daundelin  ❁  16:26, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes. I watched an episode today for the first time to examine how to answer this question. From what I can tell, RuPaul nor the show's intrinsic format make it clear that there is any kind of high or low category. A person's placement in the category is not declared by RuPaul. And being in such a category appears to have no special benefits or drawbacks. The categories high/low appear to have been invented by people not involved in the production of the show. I can see why folks are edit warring over this... it appears impossible for high/low categorizations to satisfy WP:V. Even if Vanity Fair publishes an article saying that a person was high/neutral/low, what's to prevent another publication from publishing a different categorization? – Novem Linguae (talk) 08:39, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Respectfully, if you've only seen one episode, it may not have been one where the judging format was restated explicitly. They don't repeat the rules every single episode. And generally, you won't see secondary RS contradict one another on these placements, because the placements are indeed determined by production. Though it is within the bounds of WP:PRIMARY to source this directly from episodes, I would say the confusion evident in this discussion is reason to argue that only secondary RS should be used here. Armadillo  pteryx  03:39, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * If, what you say, the placements cannot be understood from watching just one episode, doesn't that mean it belongs on a fan site? If it takes watching multiple episodes/season to figure out the placements, it is definitely WP:OR and shouldn't be on Wikipedia. -- Thijslandsmeer (talk) 08:08, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Since all episodes follow the same procedure (with rare, explicitly noted exceptions), I don't think needing to see one episode that delineates the framework is OR—but a better solution is to simply use standalone, secondary RS. As I have said before, I am not against removing high/low from the tables for now (or indefinitely), as the most recent state of them was not in line with WP:V. I am just noting that it is possible to source this in a way that does satisfy WP:V, so if someone wants to take the time to do that in the future, it should be allowed. Armadillo  pteryx  12:47, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I have watched every English-language episode of Drag Race that has ever been aired. At no time is it stated "You are high, you are low." Ever. What is stated is: "You are the winner(s). You are safe. You are LSFYL. Sashay, chanté." The "You are the tops and bottoms" is directed at the entire group, it is not actually specified who is who. Which means that every instance of listing someone specific as high or low is based on interpretation and personal opinion; WP:OR. The queens saying who they think is top and bottom is also opinion--and is hilariously wrong at times. Secondary sources stating definitively X was high and Y was low are, similarly, interpretation and opinion; the only way to list those is in full text in an article with something like "Some people considered This Queen high at the end of the episode (reference)." Daundelin  ❁  13:07, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * You're right that the judges generally say "tops" and "bottoms" rather than "high" and "low", but the latter terms are in common, synonymous use—both in secondary RS and on the show by contestants. It seems that what we fundamentally disagree on is whether viewers (or secondary sources) are doing any "interpretation" at all. We are probably not going to get anywhere rehashing that. Armadillo  pteryx  13:22, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The judges refer to the group as 'tops and bottoms.' At no time is it said "You are high/top, you are low/bottom." Therefore it is interpretation to say X is high, Y is low. The only times when that can be said without interpretation is that the winner was, in retrospect, high, and whoever LSFYL was, again in retrospect, low. Any other queens in between are simply told that they are safe, and are not told whether they were high or low. That is a simple fact. And it means, therefore, that anyone inserting high/low is engaging in interpretation of what 'positive' or 'negative' means, which is WP:OR. I understand that you like having high/low in, that doesn't make it encyclopedic, or within wikipedia scope or policy. The fandom site contains all the same information, if you need it then you can visit that site.
 * And I am not sure what part of "do not refactor my comments" was unclear, but I am repeating it here for emphasis: I placed my initial comment exactly where I wanted to, because it was responding directly to yours. If you have an issue with that, you can ask me. Do not move my comments around. I have replaced my comment where it belongs, and I have moved yours back to where you initially replied. Do not move mine again. Daundelin  ❁  13:29, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * None of my comments are based in what I "like" but rather in policy and facts, which you don't seem to understand. I am once again putting this thread where it belongs per Help:Talk pages, which states: Each comment should be indented one more level than the comment it replies to, which may or may not be the preceding comment. Your comment is still positioned in direct reply to mine, and the fact that you don't like the talk page guidelines doesn't mean you don't have to follow them. I am not finding it productive to engage with you, so I'm going to end this here.  Armadillo  pteryx  13:38, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * You can't claim that your position is grounded in policy when you don't actually quote policy and I do. You can't claim that your position is grounded in facts when I am providing them and you are not. Talk pages, in addition, are guidelines and it seems crystal clear that what you're interested in is 'winning,' and not what is encyclopedic, given your persistent moving of my comments after being told three times to stop doing it. That is what makes this conversation pointless; your refusal to listen. Literally the only reason I am not moving my comment back to where it belongs is that I will not be baited by you into an edit war.
 * The bottom line here is that the high/low nonsense violates multiple policies, including WP:NOR and WP:SYNTH and you have completely failed to provide a single argument, from policy, that they don't. That's it. End of discussion. Daundelin ❁  13:45, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I'd like to encourage folks to strategize a bit and look at the big picture. The contestant progress tables are less likely to get deleted in RFCs if they are perceived to be following policies such as WP:NOR. For this reason alone, it may be worth sacrificing some data. The fact that removing high/low may also end years of edit warring is also a benefit. – Novem Linguae (talk) 19:30, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree with this. I feel kind of like a broken record saying this again, but I'm seriously not bothered if we leave high/low out. I have just been trying to clarify that it is possible to source them in accordance with WP:V if someone actually wishes to take that on (I don't personally). I think the changes that have been made so far are improvements, and I support them. Armadillo  pteryx  20:23, 7 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Yes. It is subjective. While some contestants discuss "bottom three" or "top three", there is not a single criteria that can be applied across the entire show to determine the standings. Also, looking at the talk pages of previous seasons it seems that the original standings are heavily based in original research by Oath2Order (like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:RuPaul%27s_Drag_Race_(season_1) ). Not A Superhero (talk) 19:08, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Courtesy ping to . Armadillo  pteryx  03:39, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah it was 100% original research . It's absolutely subjective. The highs and lows are always subject to people's interpretations of what the judges say. That's why there's edit wars about "no they were safe because the judges said XYZ". Oath2order (talk) 22:26, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * No. 9 times out of 10 the HIGHS and LOWS aren't subjective in the slightest. We may disagree with the show putting a queen in a place (for example Tina being low in the Rusical), but it's extremely objected that the show presented the queen as low that week. There are maybe a few circumstances where yes it is up to interpretation, and in those if it's easier to just put those queens as SAFE but got critiques then yeah go for it. But the show very explicitly separates queens who receive critiques and queens who don't, and the editing/judges critiques very clearly shows us who is meant to be HIGH and who is meant to be LOW. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DARealityTV (talk • contribs)
 * No. HIGH and LOW placements (referred to in-show as "Tops" and "Bottoms") have always been intrinsic to the show's format and are almost always explicitly outlined either through critiques or through the order the contestants are called without the need for subjectivity or fan speculation. Removing these specifications would render the charts much less comprehensive and understate a given's contestant's progress throughout the season. For isolated cases where a given contestant's critiques are mixed or their placement is unclear, the second SAFE placement (with cornsilk background) usually suffices. Wolfenstein33 (talk) 20:29, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * No. Definitely a big no. Wikipedia users have reported being confused and discontent at the lack of this crucial information lately, and it does not serve any purpose to deliberately make these pages less informative. The high and low placements are a central part of the show and with very few exceptions there are no doubts as to which contestants placed in the top and in the bottom. I strongly advice we stop removing them. Zouki08 (talk) 21:47, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I would also like to add that the episodes themselves are pretty clear sources regarding who is in the top and who is in the bottom (normally 3 of each). In almost every episode of RuPaul's Drag Race: Untucked there is a segment where the contestants who received critiques on stage enter the backstage area and inform the safe contestants which ones of them were in the top and which ones were in the bottom. So this is not a matter of our own opinions, this is very clearly stated in the show. There are also episodes with team challenges where an entire team is announced as the top team of the week or the winning team of the week. Usually one member of the team is declared the ultimate winner. But right now the tables do not acknowledge the top/winning team at all in such cases, as they're all listed as just SAFE even though their team won the challenge. That is something that can also be easily addressed by adding back the HIGH's and LOW's. Zouki08 (talk) 16:51, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * No, definitely not. There is no reason for this and the decision was clearly made by just a few people. And now you've started an edit-war because of your decision to go against the majority. Rebecvell (talk) 16:19, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Though it is literally you starting to edit war. -- Thijslandsmeer (talk) 17:18, 20 October 2021 (UTC)


 * No. Agreed with the previous points, there's no point in changing the entire thing, I don't think stripping the information down does anyone any good? I'm colour blind and never had any issue reading the highs and lows. Seems like a massive overcorrection to me. So that's 6 votes for no, 5 votes for yes?51.37.116.82 (talk) 18:04, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * What an unusual first edit. How is it you were made aware of this conversation? --Kbabej (talk) 18:37, 3 November 2021 (UTC)


 * No I don't really buy the arguments about original research; it strikes me as intentionally obtuse. The show refers to a group of contestants as "tops and bottoms" and a subset are explicitly considered for elimination. I'm supposed to believe it takes specialized knowledge to figure out that the people explicitly considered for elimination from the competition were not among that episode's best (i.e. in the top)? It's painfully obvious who the bottoms are in that group of tops and bottoms. The switch from tops and bottoms to high and low is likewise straightforward since they're outright synonyms. If there are reasons to abandon the high/low distinction, it's WP:NOTOR. — Wug·a·po·des​ 19:23, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If it were 'painfully obvious' who the high/low are, there wouldn't be endless edit wars over who is high and who is low. And yet, there are endless edit wars--or, indeed, were; there haven't been edit wars over that since the WP:OR and WP:FANCRUFT were removed. Daundelin  ❁  20:20, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The discussion isn't about fancruft, and I don't particularly care. The OP asks for opinions on how to interpret the policy on original research in this context. You bring up edit warring for some reason, seemingly misrepresenting the actual issue. Based on the article linked in the OP, no one was swapping high and low; the edit wars that brought this on were about using "safe" for those who did not win and were not in the bottom two. It was on the classification system to use, not the actual statements. Like I said, figuring out the division between top and bottom isn't hard. It's certainly on par with figuring out the plot of a novel which we use primary sources for all the time. An edit war over the plot of a book doesn't mean we throw up our hands and declare original research. My guess as to why people were edit warring is because they didn't like it (e.g., think it's fancruft) and were looking for some policy to make their argument seem stronger than it is. Whether it's fan cruft, helpful, a vandalism magnet, etc are all things to consider when deciding to have these classifications, but the question I answered was about the OR policy. I've seen original research and have done original research; this is not original research. — Wug·a·po·des​ 21:54, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you. You summed it up much better than I've been able to. The past edit wars didn't seem to be because it was hard to tell who was in the top and in the bottom, but because some users intentionally changed it because they wanted their opinion of who deserved to be in the top and the bottom to be reflected in the progress table. Something which we'll hopefully see a lot less of now that the tables are moved, as finding the right page to edit them will be more difficult for users who don't know where to look. Zouki08 (talk) 23:20, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

It has been a while
Since it has been a while since anyone added anything to this discussion, I went ahead and made all the remaining tables for the whole franchise. I saw that everyone agreed on the use of the legend, and the majority agreed on removing the HIGH/LOW placements. Beneath, you'll find how every table will look like with those changes made. For now, I've used a bit of elaborate styling, but the templates currently being used for the progress tables can also be changed, and then added to the tables as well.

RuPaul's Drag Race Season 1

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|BeBe Zahara Benet won RuPaul's Drag Race.}} {{legend|silver|Nina Flowers was the runner-up.}} {{legend|aqua|Nina Flowers was voted Miss Congeniality (Miss C) by viewers.}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the challenge in that episode.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe by the judges in that episode.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant had to lip sync in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}} {{legend|gainsboro|Guest, indicates that the contestant returned as a guest in that episode.}}

RuPaul's Drag Race Season 2

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|Tyra Sanchez won RuPaul's Drag Race.}} {{legend|silver|Raven was the runner-up.}} {{legend|aqua|Pandora Boxx was voted Miss Congeniality (Miss C) by viewers.}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the challenge in that episode.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe by the judges in that episode.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant had to lip sync in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}} {{legend|gainsboro|Guest, indicates that the contestant returned as a guest in that episode.}}

RuPaul's Drag Race Season 3

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|Raja won RuPaul's Drag Race.}} {{legend|silver|Manila Luzon was the runner-up.}} {{legend|aqua|Yara Sofia was voted Miss Congeniality (Miss C) by viewers.}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the challenge in that episode.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe by the judges in that episode.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant had to lip sync in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}} {{legend|gainsboro|Guest, indicates that the contestant returned as a guest in that episode.}}

RuPaul's Drag Race Season 4

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|Sharon Needles won RuPaul's Drag Race.}} {{legend|silver|Chad Michaels and Phi-Phi O'Hara were the runners-up.}} {{legend|aqua|Latrice Royale was voted Miss Congeniality (Miss C) by viewers.}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the challenge in that episode.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe by the judges in that episode.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant had to lip sync in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}} {{legend|gainsboro|Guest, indicates that the contestant returned as a guest in that episode.}}

RuPaul's Drag Race Season 5

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|Jinkx Monsoon won RuPaul's Drag Race.}} {{legend|silver|Alaska and Roxxxy Andrews were the runners-up.}} {{legend|aqua|Ivy Winters was voted Miss Congeniality (Miss C) by viewers.}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the challenge in that episode.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe by the judges in that episode.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant had to lip sync in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}} {{legend|gainsboro|Guest, indicates that the contestant returned as a guest in that episode.}}

RuPaul's Drag Race Season 6

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|Bianca Del Rio won RuPaul's Drag Race.}} {{legend|silver|Adore Delano and Courtney Act were the runners-up.}} {{legend|aqua|BenDeLaCreme was voted Miss Congeniality (Miss C) by viewers.}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the challenge in that episode.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe by the judges in that episode.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant had to lip sync in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}} {{legend|gainsboro|Guest, indicates that the contestant returned as a guest in that episode.}}

RuPaul's Drag Race Season 7

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|Violet Chachki won RuPaul's Drag Race.}} {{legend|silver|Ginger Minj and Pearl were the runners-up.}} {{legend|aqua|Katya was voted Miss Congeniality (Miss C) by viewers.}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the challenge in that episode.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe by the judges in that episode.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant had to lip sync in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}} {{legend|gainsboro|Guest, indicates that the contestant returned as a guest in that episode.}}

RuPaul's Drag Race Season 8

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|Bob the Drag Queen won RuPaul's Drag Race.}} {{legend|silver|Kim Chi and Noami Smalls were the runners-up.}} {{legend|aqua|Cynthia Lee Fontaine was voted Miss Congeniality (Miss C) by viewers.}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the challenge in that episode.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe by the judges in that episode.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant had to lip sync in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}} {{legend|gainsboro|Guest, indicates that the contestant returned as a guest in that episode.}}

RuPaul's Drag Race Season 9

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|Sasha Velour won RuPaul's Drag Race.}} {{legend|silver|Peppermint was the runner-up.}} {{legend|aqua|Valentina was voted Miss Congeniality (Miss C) by viewers.}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the challenge in that episode.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe by the judges in that episode.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant had to lip sync in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}} {{legend|gainsboro|Guest, indicates that the contestant returned as a guest in that episode.}}

RuPaul's Drag Race Season 10

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|Aquaria won RuPaul's Drag Race.}} {{legend|silver|Eureka and Kameron Michaels were the runners-up.}} {{legend|aqua|Monét X Change was voted Miss Congeniality (Miss C) by viewers.}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the challenge in that episode.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe by the judges in that episode.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant had to lip sync in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}} {{legend|gainsboro|Guest, indicates that the contestant returned as a guest in that episode.}}

RuPaul's Drag Race Season 11

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|Yvie Oddly won RuPaul's Drag Race.}} {{legend|silver|Brooke Lynn Hytes was the runner-up.}} {{legend|aqua|Nina West was voted Miss Congeniality (Miss C) by viewers.}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the challenge in that episode.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe by the judges in that episode.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant had to lip sync in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}} {{legend|gainsboro|Guest, indicates that the contestant returned as a guest in that episode.}}

RuPaul's Drag Race Season 12

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|Jaida Essence Hall won RuPaul's Drag Race.}} {{legend|silver|Crystal Methyd and Gigi Goode were the runners-up.}} {{legend|aqua|Heidi N Closet was voted Miss Congeniality (Miss C) by viewers.}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the challenge in that episode.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe by the judges in that episode.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant had to lip sync in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|DISQ (Disqualified) indicates that the contestant was disqualified in that episode.}} {{legend|gainsboro|Guest, indicates that the contestant returned as a guest in that episode.}}

RuPaul's Drag Race Season 13

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|Symone won RuPaul's Drag Race.}} {{legend|silver|Kandy Muse was the runner-up.}} {{legend|aqua|LaLa Ri was voted Miss Congeniality (Miss C) by viewers.}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the challenge in that episode.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe by the judges in that episode.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant had to lip sync in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}} {{legend|darkorange|LOSS, indicates that the contestant lost their lip sync in the first episode's lip sync tournament.}} {{legend|gainsboro|Guest, indicates that the contestant returned as a guest in that episode.}}

RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars Season 1

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|Chad Michaels won RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars.}} {{legend|silver|Raven was the runner-up.}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the challenge in that episode.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe by the judges in that episode.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant had to lip sync in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}}

RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars Season 2

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|Alaska won RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars.}} {{legend|silver|Detox and Katya were the runners-up.}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the challenge and the Lip Sync for Your Legacy in that episode.}} {{legend|yellow|Top 2, indicates the contestant won the challenge in that episode, but lost the Lip Sync for Your Legacy.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe by the judges in that episode.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant had to lip sync in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|QUIT, indicates that Adore Delano quit the competition in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|OUT, indicates that the contestant had a chance to win re-entry into the competition that week, but lost.}} {{legend|gainsboro|Guest, indicates that the contestant returned as a guest in that episode.}}

RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars Season 3

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|Trixie Mattel won RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars.}} {{legend|silver|Kennedy Davenport was the runner-up.}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the challenge and the Lip Sync for Your Legacy in that episode.}} {{legend|yellow|Top 2, indicates the contestant won the challenge in that episode, but lost the Lip Sync for Your Legacy.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe by the judges in that episode.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant had to lip sync in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|QUIT, indicates that BenDeLaCreme won the challenge, but chose to eliminate herself from the competition in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|OUT, indicates that the contestant had a chance to win re-entry into the competition that week, but was not chosen.}} {{legend|gainsboro|Guest, indicates that the contestant returned as a guest in that episode.}}

RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars Season 4

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|Monét X Change and Trinity The Tuck won RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars.}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the challenge and the Lip Sync for Your Legacy in that episode.}} {{legend|yellow|Top 2, indicates the contestant won the challenge in that episode, but lost the Lip Sync for Your Legacy.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe by the judges in that episode.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant had to lip sync in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|OUT, indicates that the contestant had a chance to win re-entry into the competition that week, but was not chosen.}} {{legend|gainsboro|Guest, indicates that the contestant returned as a guest in that episode.}}

RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars Season 5

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|Shea Coulée won RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars.}} {{legend|silver|Jujubee and Miz Cracker were the runners-up.}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the challenge in that episode.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe by the judges in that episode.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant had to lip sync in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}} {{legend|gainsboro|Guest, indicates that the contestant returned as a guest in that episode.}}

Canada's Drag Race Season 1

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|Priyanka won Canada's Drag Race.}} {{legend|silver|Rita Baga and Scarlett BoBo were the runners-up.}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the challenge in that episode.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe by the judges in that episode.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant had to lip sync in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}} {{legend|gainsboro|Guest, indicates that the contestant returned as a guest in that episode.}}

Drag Race España Season 1

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|Carmen Farala won Drag Race España.}} {{legend|silver|Killer Queen and Sagittaria were the runners-up.}} {{legend|aqua|Pupi Poisson was voted Miss Congeniality (Miss C).}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the challenge in that episode.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe by the judges in that episode.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant had to lip sync in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|QUIT, indicates that Inti quit the competition in that episode.}} {{legend|gainsboro|Guest, indicates that the contestant returned as a guest in that episode.}}

Drag Race Holland Season 1

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|Envy Peru won Drag Race Holland.}} {{legend|silver|Janey Jacké was the runner-up.}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the challenge in that episode.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe by the judges in that episode.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant had to lip sync in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}} {{legend|gainsboro|Guest, indicates that the contestant returned as a guest in that episode.}}

Drag Race Thailand Season 1

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|Natalia Pliaclam won Drag Race Thailand.}} {{legend|silver|Année Maywong and Dearis Doll were the runners-up.}} {{legend|aqua|B Ella was voted Miss Congeniality (Miss C) by her fellow contestants.}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the main challenge in that episode.}} {{legend|lightgreen|Runway challenge win, indicates the contestant won the runway challenge in that episode.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe by the judges in that episode.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant had to lip sync in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}} {{legend|gainsboro|Guest, indicates that the contestant returned as a guest in that episode.}}

Drag Race Thailand Season 2

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|Natalia Pliaclam won Drag Race Thailand.}} {{legend|silver|Année Maywong and Dearis Doll were the runners-up.}} {{legend|aqua|B Ella was voted Miss Congeniality (Miss C) by her fellow contestants.}} {{legend|hotpink|Kandy Zyanide was voted Drag Pop Star by Audience.}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the main challenge in that episode.}} {{legend|lightgreen|RWIN (Runway challenge win), indicates the contestant won the runway challenge in that episode.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe by the judges in that episode.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant had to lip sync in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}} {{legend|gainsboro|Guest, indicates that the contestant returned as a guest in that episode.}}

RuPaul's Drag Race Down Under Season 1

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|Kita Mean won RuPaul's Drag Race Down Under.}} {{legend|silver|Art Simone, Karen from Finance and Scarlet Adams were the runners-up.}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the challenge in that episode.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe by the judges in that episode.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant had to lip sync in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}} {{legend|gainsboro|Guest, indicates that the contestant returned as a guest in that episode.}}

RuPaul's Drag Race UK Season 1

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|The Vivienne won RuPaul's Drag Race UK.}} {{legend|silver|Divina De Campo was the runner-up.}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the challenge in that episode.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe by the judges in that episode.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant had to lip sync in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}} {{legend|gainsboro|Guest, indicates that the contestant returned as a guest in that episode.}}

RuPaul's Drag Race UK Season 2

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|Lawrence Chaney won RuPaul's Drag Race UK.}} {{legend|silver|Bimini Bon-Boulash and Tayce were the runners-up.}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the challenge in that episode.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe by the judges in that episode.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant had to lip sync in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|QUIT, indicates that Ginny Lemon quit the competition in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|WDR (Withdraw), indicates that Veronica Green was forced to withdraw from the competition in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|OUT, indicates that the contestant was not voted to return to the competition in that episode.}} {{legend|gainsboro|Guest, indicates that the contestant returned as a guest in that episode.}}

Thijslandsmeer (talk) 09:26, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * . Looks good to me. Let's move forward. Thanks for your work on this. – Novem Linguae (talk) 08:43, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * agreed, this is good. And better than good, it's actually encyclopedic--and will hopefully end the plague of the drivebys who just love to edit war over who was 'high' and who was 'low.' Excellent work. Daundelin  ❁  22:13, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

I think I'll transform the article's tables once All Stars 6 is finished, which is in a few days. I'll also fix the table for that season then. If that is fine, at least. Thijslandsmeer (talk) 20:22, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for working on this today. We may also want to move any progress tables that aren't in templates to templates. Also be aware that UK series 2 in a controversial RFC voted to remove their contestant progress table. If that table gets reverted, I may open a second RFC on the issue. – Novem Linguae (talk) 19:17, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I think that'll be a good idea, especially because there is a big chance that some (unregistered) users and/or fans will change or revert these tables. Given the fact that there was no consensus reached with these templates at TfD, I think this is possible. I would be fine working on this as well, although I think waiting a bit for the UK series two table might be a good idea. Thijslandsmeer (talk) 19:32, 2 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Seeing as the survey above has had more No's than Yes's by now, and due to there actually being complaints from fans of the show and Wikipedia users over the removal of the HIGH's and LOW's, I would suggest we add them back. These new tables and legends are great and as for all the other recent changes they very much make sense from the point of view of what's relevant to the show. But as many people have pointed out, the missing information regarding HIGH's and LOW's makes the tables quite useless to track progress of a contestant and is pushing users to use alternative sources to find that information rather than Wikipedia. Keeping the new tables but adding these back would be the best way of making sure the pages stay streamlined but informative. Zouki08 (talk) 16:12, 6 September 2021 (UTC)


 * As you can see in the discussion above, there is more than enough reason why the HIGHs and LOWs were removed (and why they shouldn't be added back). -- Thijslandsmeer (talk) 17:03, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I have followed the discussion above. And no, I did not see any reasons strong enough to make the pages less informative by removing something that is a central part of the show and that has been an important part of the Drag Race pages on Wikipedia for 13 years. And as stated above, it is not WP:OR since the information is attributable to the show itself and to the Untucked episodes. Zouki08 (talk) 18:39, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The thing is that it is WP:OR and it might be important for a fansite, but not for an encyclopedia. We can only use the LOW and HIGH placement if the show clearly states it. The only thing we can extract from the episodes are the wins, bottom placements and eliminated contestants. The rest of the contestants are declared "safe" at the end of the day. Nowhere in the episodes (except by the contestant's interpretation of the critiques) can we cite HIGH and LOW placements. The reason why a lot of users edit the LOW/SAFE/HIGH placements is because everyone interprets critiques differently. -- Thijslandsmeer (talk) 18:54, 6 September 2021 (UTC)


 * (edit conflic) Just because something has been done a certain way for a while doesn't mean it can't be changed. The high/low stuff is never actually stated by the show--it is said "you are the tops and bottoms," but at no point in my recollection of 13 main seasons, 6 AS seasons, 2 seasons of UK, and 1 of Canada has there ever been a statement "you, specifically, are high and you, specifically, are low." That's what makes it original research, as well as shading into WP:SYNTH. You should probably also read WP:PRIMARY. If people want fan-generated information, and the endless, interminable arguments over "well X should ackshullllly be high because blah blah" and the edit wars and all that nonsense, they can go to the fan wiki which does list those things. Wikipedia has policies, the high/low stuff is against several of them, and even third-party sources (such as recaps in AVClub or Vulture or wherever) are expressing an opinion about who is high/low, one that is never actually stated by the show itself.


 * What the show does state is: "You are safe. You are the winner(s). You are LSFYL." Those are easily verifiable declarative statements, which require no interpretation, no opinion, and do not generate edit wars or the seemingly endless parade of one-shot IP or brand new accounts who show up to vandalize because their preferred queen isn't being listed in the 'right' way. Daundelin  ❁  19:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Adding: simply counting the votes in a Wikipedia discussion doesn't matter. There could be 17 votes on one side of an issue, and 2 on the other--and if the 2 are citing policy and the 17 aren't, then the 2 wins. Daundelin  ❁  19:02, 6 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Claiming these placements as WP:OR is a huge reach, check Season 6 Episode 4 when RuPaul says "the nominees for best actress are..." and then selects one as the winner so there's definitely proof of the high/low placements within the show itself, besides the aforementioned untucked scenes where contestants will usually state things such as "Well, I'm in the bottom" and such. Besides that I would like to emphasize the point that people who actually use these pages are looking for the high/low placements too, and as stated earlier they will just end up going to the fan site as these pages are incomplete. Rhinocedolphin (talk) 13:10, 7 September 2021 (UTC)


 * It is not a 'huge reach.' For the reasons noted above. And it's amazing how many people suddenly have brand new accounts to weigh in on this discussion. Daundelin  ❁  13:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Can't we source these placements for seasons with untucked? Using the show as the primary source and untucked as the secondary, we would definitely be able to support high/low placements for the later seasons at least. Wouldn't that meet the requirements of WP:PRIMARY? And yeah, I noticed that the wiki was messed up so I made a wiki account to see what was up. Rhinocedolphin (talk) 13:46, 7 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Because when a queen says "I'm high she's low," that's a matter of opinion, not fact. And they get it wrong, hilariously at times. Quoting policy on your second edit, but you're brand new, okay sure. Daundelin  ❁  13:52, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Ive said this under the All Stars 6 Table change, but was told to say something under here instead. This “Consensus” for lack of better terms is pure Bull. Each week there are usually 3 tops and 3 bottoms (with the exception of a challenge judged groups/pairs and near then end with no Safe queens) and when you remove the placements it takes away from what the Queens did to earn said placements. If you guys are tired of the constant moving of 1 person from “Safe” to “High” or from “Safe” to “Low” then lock the page completely with 1-3 people editing the tables because clearly allowing EVERYONE to have a say is difficult, but it doesn’t mean changing the entirety of the table to discredit everyone. Especially for queens who have been in the top countless times but hadn’t won anything, it makes it look like they had been “Safe” and only safe when in reality they had been doing a great job. Yvng.Kxng (talk) 14:55, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, that is my issue with this as well. The tables are almost made useless when they don't include any mentions of who were in the top and who were in the bottom. Look at e.g. the table for season 11. The way it's been changed, it looks as if the winner only got a high placing in one episode, while in fact she was in the top seven times in total. Two of which she was part of a winning team, which is something that is definitely stated in the show and not original research. It is hardly useful for anybody to withhold that information. Zouki08 (talk) 09:40, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * No information is being 'withheld.' Some information is encyclopedic, and some is not. At no point in the show does anyone point at the queens and say "You are high, you are low, you are high, you are low." That is an invention of fans and therefore not encyclopedic. Please actually read the discussion and understand it, because for both of you, your arguments boil down to "but I want it there," with no actual policy backing you up. Daundelin  ❁  11:31, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I have read the discussion multiple times, but there's nothing there that's reason to change my mind. I'm fully aware that your interpretation is that this is not encyclopaedic. But I, like many others here, simply don't agree with your interpretation. And yes, there are numerous times where RuPaul actually does directly tell contestants that they are in the top or in the bottom. There are also moments when the judges clearly state who's in the top and the bottom while deliberating. So the existence of top and bottom placings is very clearly not just something that fans have simply invented. So I do not think there are any reasons strong enough to discredit it as not encyclopaedic. Zouki08 (talk) 12:00, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay well unfortunately you are wrong. Please accept the consensus and stop edit-warring. Thank you. Daundelin  ❁  12:03, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * What consensus? It's very clear from the discussion that there isn't one. Zouki08 (talk) 12:41, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The consensus, grounded in policy for removing the high/low nonsense from the progress tables. Thus far, not a single argument against the removal has been able to cite policy in support. Which means that those arguments are dismissed, that's how it works. Daundelin  ❁  12:45, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The "consensus" seems more like it's based on the opinion of less than a handful of people and their own arbitrary interpretation of the policy. I have so far not seen any argument for removing the HIGH's and LOW's that has clear support in the policy. So if you're going to dismiss the arguments of the majority for not being grounded in policy, we might as well dismiss yours for the same reason. If you want to base such a major change on a consensus, you can't just simply chose to only count the opinions of those who agree with you. Zouki08 (talk) 09:29, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but if you can't see any argument in the discussion above that's stating policy, you haven't read the discussion. If your only arguments are; "it's ugly" and "you don't see who did well", you're not really making a point. Where in WP's policy does it state that it is necessary to see who did well? I'm not going to keep repeating myself. -- Thijslandsmeer (talk) 09:36, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Again, you are welcome to quote policy that supports your position. You know, like we have. Your continued failure to do so makes it crystal clear that the sum total of your argument is WP:ILIKEIT. Unless and until you can quote actual policy in support of your argument, it will continue to be dismissed in favour of arguments which do rest on policy. That's just how Wikipedia works. Daundelin  ❁  10:42, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Further: at the very least, each and every instance of 'high' and 'low,' if you want them included so badly, must be verified. So you're welcome to try and find citations of factual statements about high/low for each and every episode. Daundelin  ❁  10:46, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * As I mentioned before, the episodes themselves are source enough for most of the cases. However, even if in some cases it isn't 100 % obvious who was in the top and the bottom, what there is absolutely no doubt about is that that we can use each episode as the source for who received critiques on stage and who was declared safe/sent directly to untuck. At the very least, we should include this in the progress tables. Something like "Contestant received critique on stage but was declared safe". And in addition to that, there is no reason to not include information about who was part of a winning team in the progress table. Zouki08 (talk) 09:52, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * And again, no, the episodes themselves are not source enough, because at no point are contestants explicitly told "you have placed high, you have placed low."
 * And yet again: you are welcome to make an argument based in policy. You have not done so. Until you do so, your arguments will be ignored. Daundelin  ❁  11:56, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't think you're listening to what I'm even saying now. My suggestion is what could be considered a compromise, where we don't actually say who was "high" and who was "low", but rather just differntiate between contestants who were declared safe without receiving critiques on stage, and those who were only safe after having received critiques on stage. So basically, everyone who got critiqued on stage (but who neither won the episode or were in the bottom) would be displayed with the same colour in the progress table. (Which isn't ideal from a user perspective, but I admit that it is a much more clear-cut case of adhering to policy than displaying the highs and lows like the tables used to). Zouki08 (talk) 20:42, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Below is an example of what I am referring to, although this is a bit of a rough version and it would perhaps need to be a different colour. Zouki08 (talk) 21:13, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

RuPaul's Drag Race Season 10

Legend: {{legend|#D4AF37|Aquaria won RuPaul's Drag Race.}} {{legend|silver|Eureka and Kameron Michaels were the runners-up.}} {{legend|aqua|Monét X Change was voted Miss Congeniality (Miss C) by viewers.}} {{legend|royalblue|Win, indicates the contestant won the challenge in that episode.}} {{legend|cornsilk|Safe, indicates that contestant received critiques by the judges but was ultimately declared safe.}} {{legend|white|Safe, indicates that the contestant was declared safe without receiving critiques by the judges.}} {{legend|lightblue|Safe, indicates that the contestant was part of the winning team but was declared safe.}} {{legend|lightpink|BTM (Bottom) indicates that the contestant had to lip sync in that episode.}} {{legend|tomato|ELIM (Eliminated) indicates that the contestant was eliminated in that episode.}} {{legend|gainsboro|Guest, indicates that the contestant returned as a guest in that episode.}}


 * Although this might be possible and can be cited from the episodes, my main concerns are; 1) If they are declared safe, regardless of them receiving critiques onstage, what important information do two different background colors add to the tables? 2) If this were to be implemented, this idea does not adhere to MOS:COLOR, as we can not have just color to convey information. -- Thijslandsmeer (talk) 21:29, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, you're right, the wording would have to be different, so that it isn't just a different colour. The above example is basically just a work in progress, but I'm sure we could figure out a way to display it in a way that adheres to MOS:COLOR. As for the importance of the information, the on-stage critiques are a central and pretty important element of the show. Displaying it would be both informative regarding what happened in each episode, but also better present a contestant's progress in a factual and sourced manner. (And as it's supposed to be a progress table, that's preferably what it should aim do to). Zouki08 (talk) 19:36, 13 October 2021 (UTC)


 * That information is unencyclopedic--it doesn't matter, it's irrelevant, it's just WP:FANCRUFT. And it's against policy, as the above user pointed out. Daundelin  ❁  22:41, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

I would love for somebody to show me where the consensus is on this page? Where did everybody agree that highs and lows should be removed off of every Drag Race page? I don’t see it anywhere. Lots of lies and bs coming from the users who’ve deemed themselves in charge of Wikipedia, a platform that is supposed to be collaborative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:60DF:41A0:CC17:D4ED:FEF1:6446 (talk) 19:01, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
 * It's literally right above this comment, in the section titled 'progress charts across all seasons.' On top of which, you need to either substantiate your accusation that people are lying, or remove it. You can't substantiate it, because nobody is, so you need to remove the comment.
 * Nobody has 'deemed themselves in charge.' The simple fact of the matter is that policy exists, and content must follow policy. There are no policy arguments for retaining high/low, as has been explained at great length above. There are plenty of policy arguments for getting rid of them, as has been explained at great length above. Daundelin  ❁  19:20, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I think we all know by now that you claim to have based your decision on how you've interpreted the policy. But whenever people have pointed out that they don't agree with your assessment or that the policies you've linked to don't quite back up your standpoint, you've failed to provide any other arguments. So it may be true that you made te decision with the policy in mind. But don't pretend that there was a consensus, when you've made it clear that you're dismissing any opinion that doesn't match yours. Zouki08 (talk) 13:12, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
 * and it's quite clear by now that you are making this needlessly personal, and after however many weeks have completely failed to provide a single policy-based reason for your preference. I will no longer be paying attention until you do. Daundelin  ❁  15:26, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Archive?
Any opposition to finally archiving this long discussion? Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:42, 3 December 2021 (UTC)