Wikipedia talk:WikiProject EastEnders/Style guide

Bringing this page up to MoS application standard
The opening:

Our style guideline includes the following guidelines aimed to standardise EastEnders articles:
 * 1) Adherence to the Wikipedia Manual of Style;
 * 2) Adherence to the Television WikiProject MoS;
 * 3) Adherence to the MoS with regard to fiction;
 * 4) Categorisation;
 * 5) Verification and citations;
 * 6) Organisation;
 * 7) Image usage.


 * MoS breach in the use of the first person.
 * "aimed to" is not grammatical in this sense.
 * Is adherence to something a guideline? (Ditto the other points.)
 * Organisation of what? Categorisation of what?
 * Does this guideline function only to standardise? Tony   (talk)  07:52, 13 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I copied that part from WikiProject Doctor Who/Manual of style, and that seems to have been included without any problems. Regardless, how about something like:


 * This is a style guide for EastEnders articles. It includes the following guidelines and policies from the following pages:
 * Wikipedia Manual of Style;
 * Television WikiProject MoS;
 * MoS with regard to fiction;
 * Categorisation;
 * Verifiability and citations;
 * Image usage.


 * ? I've removed "Organisation" because I don't know of any guideline or policy relating to that, but I was going to change it to "Standardisation", because we want consistency between articles, for example, use of language, layout of pages, etc. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 17:41, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I've added four words to your example.
 * All of those pages that self-elevated to MoS status need to be gone through with a tooth-comb. Tony   (talk)  22:01, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * What do you mean, exactly? AnemoneProjectors (talk) 22:30, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Do you mean the Doctor Who MOS needs to be checked as well? Fair enough, but it's been up for a long time, how will anyone know it needs to be checked? Anyway, I've put the above changes in to this page now. Is this better? AnemoneProjectors (talk) 21:09, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, but I see this has been tagged MoS again. That is premature. The Dr Who page is better, although could do with a spruce up. Tony   (talk)  22:34, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * No, it's still just tagged for copyediting. I didn't replace the MoS tag. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 22:45, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The bot has announced it again: Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style. PS To get editors reading this, you just review/comment on a few articles and link them to this. Tony   (talk)  23:08, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The bot announced it's been UNmarked as part of the MoS. It was when you removed the MoS banner. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:34, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The link you just gave is about Manual of Style Register being unmarked as part of the MoS, not this page. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:36, 16 January 2010 (UTC)