Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/American cinema task force/Archive 1

Page move of Barry Lyndon article
A user has moved the article from Barry Lyndon to Barry Lyndon (film), and now the former page is a disambig page. A discussion has been started on the article's talk page to request it be moved back to how it was. Your thoughts would be welcomed. Thanks! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 20:21, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Peer review for Remember Last Night? now open
The peer review for Remember Last Night? is now open; all editors are invited to participate, and any input there would be appreciated! Thanks! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 21:27, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Dispute at Talk:Casablanca (film) needs more input
I believe it would be useful to have more opinions on Talk:Casablanca (film) on the general question of what constitutes WP:UNDUE in terms of criticism of a film, and the specific question of whether Umberto Eco's criticism of Casablanca should be included in the article, and to what extent. Please see Criticism by Umberto Eco for the discussion so far. The original state of the article is represented by the "Critical reception" section this revision of this revision. This is being rejected as a cut-and-dried violation WP:UNDUE. Ed Fitzgerald t / c 23:24, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Article alerts
This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the  parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {{{sup|ταλκ}}κοντριβς – WP Physics} 08:47, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

James Bond film series GAR notification
James Bond film series has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 02:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello, fellow film fans!
This is to ask for your input on Balalaika, MGM 1939. Though I'm a good editor/copy writer and have been working on it since August (09), this is my first major research project of any description, anywhere. User talk:Nehrams2020 has been kind enough to help me, and I'm hoping you will look the article over; I would really appreciate your comments and suggestions, especially additional free sources of information/photos, to round it off nicely. Thank you, Shir-El   too  15:48, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement
This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 02:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced living people articles bot
Okip  02:47, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Rififi
It's a French film: see Rififi. What does the title mean in English? Some argument on the talk page about whether or not the en.wiki lede should say! Your input appreciated. S B Harris 21:39, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

FAR November (film)
nominated November (film) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. JJ98 (talk) 16:45, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Invitation to help with WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 15:11, 2 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Hello! I'm interested in helping out! I've added myself to the American cinema task force, but I'm not sure if that means anything lol. Please let me know how I can get involved! Jamodalamo (talk) 02:30, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

A consideration for cross project consolidation of talk page templates
I have started a conversation here about the possibility of combining some of the United States related WikiProject Banners into WikiProject United States. If you have any comments, questions or suggestions please take a moment and let me know. --Kumioko (talk) 19:46, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lethal Weapon 3 (soundtrack)


The article Lethal Weapon 3 (soundtrack) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No mention of notability no refernces, fails WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 11:31, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Lethal Weapon 3 (soundtrack) for deletion
The article Lethal Weapon 3 (soundtrack) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lethal Weapon 3 (soundtrack) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jeepday (talk) 00:47, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of A Little Soap and Water


The article A Little Soap and Water has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A search for references found a few minor mentions, fails WP:V and WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:45, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of A Little Soap and Water for deletion
The article A Little Soap and Water is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/A Little Soap and Water until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jeepday (talk) 02:28, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Merger needs comment
Please add your thoughts at Talk:Oh Dad, Poor Dad, Mama's Hung You in the Closet and I'm Feelin' So Sad. Thanks. Aristophanes68 (talk) 23:41, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Featured portal candidate: United States
Portal:United States is a current featured portal candidate. Please feel free to leave comments. -- RichardF (talk) 14:30, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Adding "Popular pages" to U.S.-related projects
A very interesting tool of the Wikimedia Toolserver is called WikiProject Popular pages lists. These lists are similar to project-related article lists like U. S. article lists used for generating assessment statistics. The Popular pages lists include the rank, total views, average daily views, quality and importance ratings for the listed articles. Here is the full list of projects using popular pages lists. An FAQ also is available at User:Mr.Z-man/Popular pages FAQ.

I recently added links to lists of popular pages as shown below to the U.S. Portal - WikiProjects box and the nominations sections for each of the selected articles boxes.

Portal:United States/Projects/Popular pages

Because this project was not included, I am bringing up the popular pages tool here. This tool makes it very easy to track three of four balancing dimensions when selecting articles for showcasing at a portal - quality, importance and popularity. When tracking the fourth dimension, topic, the related article lists tool (such as for U.S. article lists tool) also might be useful by filtering on categories of interest.

If you do decide to use this tool, feel free to update Portal:United States/Projects/Popular pages as well.

Regards, RichardF (talk) 02:21, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Notification on Deep Blue Sea
I've made several improvements and removed the citation tag from the Renny Harlin film Deep Blue Sea's article. You're welcome. --TheHande (talk) 17:43, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Anonymous (street Meat)
Please visit the Anonymous (Street Meat) page. Someone has removed all relevant information and the images that I have copyrighted. Can someone, please, help? Thank you so much.Mig (talk) 01:03, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

PLEASE READ - ANONYMOUS (STREET MEAT)
Someone keeps removing all relevant information and clarificationon Anonymous (Street Meat) -- why is this happening with such contentiousness? This project is being singled out while, for one examplme, the page for a short like "Saturday Night Live" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturday_Night_Special_(film) read like publicity pages and I'm told that with 3.7 million articles, it cannot be attended to. I don't understand. Is it because "Saturday Night Live" is made by a man? Please let me know. There are precious few message films made by women who are recognized by film festivals or the industry at large.

This appeared on the page: Anonymous (Street Meat)From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaJump to: navigation, search

"This article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy. Please share your thoughts on the matter at this article's entry on the Articles for deletion page. Feel free to edit the article, but the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed. For more information, particularly on merging or moving the article during the discussion, read the Guide to deletion.%5B%5BWikipedia%3AArticles+for+deletion%2FAnonymous+%28Street+Meat%29%5D%5DAFD This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. It needs additional citations for verification. Tagged since October 2011. It may have been edited by a contributor who has a close connection with its subject. Tagged since September 2011. The notability of this article's subject is in question. If notability cannot be established, it may be listed for deletion or removed. Tagged since October 2011." Kind regards,

I think that "anonymous (street meat) is placed in peril, despite its notability. I have another film to shoot and don't have all the time in the world.  I have a family and many personal responsibilities.  SO IF THEY WANT TO DELETE THIS ONE, THEY WILL.  They'll add "friendly" to their deletion as if that made it "friendly." That will be the end of it.  I ask for your assistance in this matter.  Thank you so much. Mig (talk) 13:22, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Mig (talk) 16:54, 10 October 2011 (UTC) Mig (talk) 17:01, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

ANONYMOUS (STREET MEAT)
Dear friends:

The image of the eye was restored (gun image was not) -- all images are available in "anonymous (street meat)" Google images, please, take a look. https://mail.google.com/mail/?shva=1#inbox/132e812637a7fb8e However, the file was truncated. Meanwhile, I was interviewed by someone from the Huffington Post yesterday. The interview centered on my inspiration for "anonymous (street meat)" -- a 2-year ordeal with Bank of America. With demonstrations and movements like "Occupy Wall Street" going on against Wall Street and the too-big-to-fail banks, the script for "anonymous (street meat)" was was a metaphor ahead of its time by having a plot that dealt with bank abuse with harrowing images. That's why the film has been well received at festivals abroad -- in Seoul Korea, for one, it was screened in over 14,000 monitors throughout the city. The HP article will link up to "anonymous (street meat)" and it is scheduled for publication on November 1st, or earlier. This sort of coverage is remarkable for a first film by a student while still a student (UCLA third year). "anonymous (street meat)" was finished, complete with sci-fi special effects, on January 21, 2011 - it had been presented before class at the UCLA Bridges Theater on December 8, 2010.

Whether one agrees with "anonymous (street meat)" or not ,and whether one even likes it, this is part of the news and the broader sociatal picture.

Thank you for your support in this endeavor --

Kind regardsMig (talk) 15:05, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Fall 2011 Photo Contest
WP:NRHP is having a Fall Photo Contest running from Oct. 21-Dec. 4, 2011. I'd like to encourage anybody who enjoys photography, and anybody who is interested in historic places to participate as a photographer, a sponsor, or both.

One way that an individual editor or a project can participate is to sponsor their own challenge. For example, somebody here might want to include a challenge such as "A barnstar will be awarded to the photographer who adds the most photos of previously non-illustrated NRHP sites of movie theaters to the NRHP county lists." To sponsor a challenge all you need to do is come up with an idea, post it on the contest page, and do the small bit of work needed to judge the winner(s).

Any and all contributions appreciated.

Smallbones (talk) 15:01, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposal to add American cinema task force under WikiProject United States
Greetings, I am a member of WikiProject United States, it was recently suggested that the American cinema task force of WikiProject Film might be inactive or semi active and it might be beneficial to include a joint task force for it in the list of projects supported by WikiProject United States, which Kumioko have added some of the projects like WikiProject American television and WikiProject United States Government. After reviewing the project it appears that there have not been any active discussion on the talk page in some time and the only content updates appear to be simple maintenance so being supported by a larger project might be beneficial. This discussion is intended to start the process of determining if the project members are interested in the joint task force being added to the projects supported by WikiProject United States. If have any thoughts, comments or questions, please let me know. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  09:58, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination as a United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month candidate
One or more articles relating to this project have been nominated to be a future United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month. All editors interested in improving these articles or voting for next months collaboration are encouraged to participate here. --Kumioko (talk) 19:38, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 01:36, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 18:11, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Improving the Lists of American films
I think the lists like List of American films of 1910 should have a navigation box on the top-right corner, like the page 1910 in film has ( using a template like Year nav topic2 ). And maybe another navigation box at the bottom of the page, like 1910 in film has. Also, I think sections like 1910 in film should have at the top a message like: . —  Ark25  (talk) 17:46, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposal for United States A-Class review process
There is a proposal at WikiProject United States to start an A-Class review process for United States related articles. Please stop by and join the discussion. Kumioko (talk) 02:03, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Portal for this project?
Pls comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States.Moxy (talk) 19:37, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Women's History Month is in March
Hi everyone at WikiProject American cinema!

Women's history month is around the corner, in March, and we're planning the second WikiWomen's History Month.

This event, which is organized by volunteers from the WikiWomen's Collaborative, supports improving coverage about women's history during the month of March. Events take place both offline and online. We are encouraging WikiProjects to focus on women's history related to their subject for the month of March. Ideas include:
 * Improving coverage about American women filmmakers, directors, producers, and executives
 * Developing content about women owned film businesses

We hope you'll participate! You can list your your project focus here, and also help improve our to-do list. Thank you for all you do for Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 20:39, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

New Portal:Film in the United States
I started Portal:Film in the United States. The French had one about this before we did WhisperToMe (talk) 03:23, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Importance ratings
Has this group decided to not give articles importance ratings? and if not, why are some rated by importance? i tried to find how Ronald Reagan is given a high importance rating (im not questioning the rating, only how someone managed to code it as that), and i cant find a banner that includes it in that importance category. there must be something i dont understand. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:49, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Mercurywoodrose. None of the task forces nor the Film project itself gives importance ratings. I'm not sure why not, but we don't. It's not even in our coding. Regarding Ronald Reagan, it appears that he does not even have a Film project banner. You may be referring to the parameter cinema-importance in WikiProject United States. BOVINEBOY 2008 12:14, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Discussion to remove the Automatically assessed logic from the WikiProject United States template
Greetings, there is a discussion regarding removal of the logic used to populate Automatically assessed article categories from Template:WikiProject United States. Most of the categories (over 220 Wikipedia wide) were deleted in February 2013 because they were empty. These categories were previously populated by a bot that hasn't run since 2011 and the categories aren't used. Removal of this uneeded/unused logic will greatly reduce the size and complexity of the WikiProject United States template. Any comments or questions are encouraged here. Kumioko (talk) 18:35, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Lest there is any confusion for people who don't speak the same language, the words "logic used to populate Automatically assessed article categories" refer to the feature that was supposed to allow this WikiProject's template to "inherit" class and importance ratings from other WikiProjects. Kumioko says that there are no longer any bots performing the function that formerly copied those ratings. --Orlady (talk) 22:55, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Little Nemo (1911 film) Featured Article canditature
I've put up Little Nemo (1911 film) as a Featured Article canditate, and would appreciate any and all feedback on the article. Please join in the discussion at Featured article candidates/Little Nemo (1911 film)/archive1. Curly Turkey (gobble) 07:49, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Nefarious: Merchant of Souls
The article about the American film Nefarious: Merchant of Souls has an ongoing featured article candidacy here. Any constructive comments you would be willing to provide there would be greatly appreciated. Neelix (talk) 14:55, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Not My Life
The article about the American film Not My Life has an ongoing featured article candidacy here. Any constructive comments you would be willing to provide there would be greatly appreciated. Neelix (talk) 03:08, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Mind Meld
The article about the American film Mind Meld has an ongoing featured article candidacy here. Any constructive comments you would be willing to provide there would be greatly appreciated. Neelix (talk) 12:08, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposal to add Portal:Film in the United States to Gone with the Wind (film)
Hi! Here is an RFC on whether to add Portal:Film in the United States to: Gone with the Wind (film) Village_pump_(proposals) WhisperToMe (talk) 23:32, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Uninformative article on Adolph Zukor
Very little content for such a major figure. Dougweller (talk) 12:56, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

RM: The Notebook (2004 film) → The Notebook
An RM that affects this project is currently taking place. Interested editors may wish to discuss here. Chase (talk &#124; contributions) 17:37, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Copyright Violation Detection - EranBot Project
A new copy-paste detection bot is now in general use on English Wikipedia. Come check it out at the EranBot reporting page. This bot utilizes the Turnitin software (ithenticate), unlike User:CorenSearchBot that relies on a web search API from Yahoo. It checks individual edits rather than just new articles. Please take 15 seconds to visit the EranBot reporting page and check a few of the flagged concerns. Comments welcome regarding potential improvements. These possible copyright violations (plot summaries are common) can be searched by WikiProject categories. Use "control-f" to jump to your area of interest (if such a copyvio is present).--Lucas559 (talk) 20:08, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Archived old addressed threads
I've archived some old and/or addressed threads. Addressed means for example notifications for deletion discussions that have since been closed.

Archived threads older than two (2) years old. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 05:00, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Determining Importance
I think we should set some guidelines for this. We have a problem when The Hangover Part III is rated as mid-importance. Okay. I propose these rules: -We base importance on encylopedic/informational importance. Ie, if you are film school, will they ask you about Star Wars, or will they ask you about Hitchcock? This is too focused on recentivist cultural importance, so classic silents are rated below shitty new movies in importance. In 50 years, what will we think is important? So some principles. Firstly, just because American film is more specific than regular film doesn't mean we should automatically move everything up one in importance from wikiproject film. Things moderately important to film as a whole can also be moderately important to American film. 1. No people should be top-importance. Period. No films should be top-importance. Only articles which talk about defining American cinema as a whole should be top importance. Ie, Cinema of the United States. "Classical Hollywood Cinema". 2. Most "high-importance" articles should be of influential concepts not restricted to a single person or work- Entities like "MGM", and things like "New Hollywood", "Westerns", "film noir". Films included are the kind which were masterpieces and/or pioneering for the medium, those called "the best X ever". "Casablanca", "Citizen Kane", blahblahblah. Very few people are of high importance. Basically just the people mentioned here are of high importance, though they needn't be included in this project as they are well-served by the biography project. In fact, most actors should not be in this project since they aren't the focus of film criticism. But directors like Griffith and Hitchcock are high importance. 3. Mid-importance includes the popular or critically acclaimed actors and directors not listed there, and works such as "Avatar". 4. Low-importance is everything else. --Monochrome _ Monitor  20:28, 23 December 2015 (UTC) Your thoughts on this criteria? So, yeah. I don't think I'm changing the importance correctly but right now it's pretty bad. Casablanca was ranked as low-importance. --Monochrome _ Monitor  21:40, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Production of Key Largo
A relatively small matter but, after 9 years, no-one has bothered to address a simple question about this classic movie. Though not a film connoisseur, I have read the article in question and believe it is well below WP standards. Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 06:30, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Bette Davis
I have nominated Bette Davis for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. DrKay (talk) 11:37, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Please See - Submissions
https://wikiconference.org/wiki/Submissions --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 00:47, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject United States - 50,000 Challenge
--- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:16, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Notice to participants at this page about adminship
Many participants here create a lot of content, have to evaluate whether or not a subject is notable, decide if content complies with BLP policy, and much more. Well, these are just some of the skills considered at Requests for adminship.

So, please consider taking a look at and watchlisting this page:


 * Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll

You could be very helpful in evaluating potential candidates, and even finding out if you would be a suitable RfA candidate.

Many thanks and best wishes,

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 17:39, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Article review
I have created a new article, Baby Snatcher (film), and it would be appreciated if someone would review it. Otr500 (talk) 10:55, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Bobby G. Can't Swim
I put this up today, and would appreciate anything anyone wants to do to improve it. Thanks. Invertzoo (talk) 22:13, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Movie Trailers from Internet Archive (SabuCat)
Movie Trailers from Internet Archive (SabuCat) Public Domain. Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 12:10, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

RFC of interest to this project.
See Talk:Natalie Portman. Contribute if you have an opinion. -- Jayron 32 04:05, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Blade Runner low importance?
This confuses me, it was preserved in the National Film Registry before Eraserhead; and arguably BR has had more influence on American cinema than Casablanca (film). - RoyBoy 22:35, 16 June 2017 (UTC)


 * I think it is considered low-importance for WikiProject United States in general. There are a lot more U.S. topics that are more important. It may be part of the American Cinema task force, but it's a project rating, not a task-force rating. You can see under WikiProject Film, it is considered part of the core list of films. Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 22:51, 16 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the reply, just doesn't seem appropriate in relative to other articles within this project. - RoyBoy 04:28, 18 June 2017 (UTC)


 * I think you have to consider the scope of WikiProject United States. That would include the U.S. states, the Presidents, key members of Congress, landmarks, all the major historical events, etc. Film is part of it, but I am not sure if Blade Runner rates highly in that scope. I don't think it matters too much as long as it is definitely recognized as a core film by WikiProject Film. Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 13:44, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Star Wars at GAR
A GAR was opened up for Star Wars a month ago, and it's starting to garner comments. Lately, the article has been having issues with structure, length, disputes over the best way to summarize the elements. Due to the importance of the article, and some budding disagreement about the best way to address its issues, more eyes would be appreciated. The GAR is at Good article reassessment/Star Wars/1. ~Cheers, Ten  Ton  Parasol  19:02, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed merger (Begotten and Din of Celestial Birds)
There is a discussion at Talk:Din of Celestial Birds to merge the short film article with its feature length predecessor, Begotten (film).  Dark Knight  2149  19:59, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

RFC on Film MOS
I opened up an RFC on proposed changes to the Film:MOS. You can vote on it here Thanks. --Deathawk (talk) 22:48, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Eyes needed...
...on current WP:POINTy editing on Pre-Code Hollywood, the result of the editor not getting their way at Talk:Pre-Code Hollywood. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:32, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Query
Can non-americans join this project? Harsh Rathod  13:17, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Sleepy Hollow (film) - GA reassessment
Sleepy Hollow (film), an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amakuru (talk • contribs) 11:53, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Crediting The Wachowskis
Opinions are needed on the following matter: Talk:The Matrix (franchise)/Archive 2. It primarily concerns the franchise known as the Matrix, an American-made film. A permalink for it is here. &#8213; Matthew J. Long -Talk-☖  19:10, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

The Thin Man discussion
Members of this project may be interested in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Thin_Man_(film)#%22Hard-drinking%22? this discussion]. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:50, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

MDMA (film)
Hi

Can someone please take a look and try and find some refs?

I found one I could see, but was getting ECs from a self-appointed reviewer :(

There is not much here in the UK, and MOST of the ref sites I found are US and not available in the UK, so I cannot get refs from them :(

Thanks Chaosdruid (talk) 16:27, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Category:XBIZ Award winners has been nominated for deletion
Category:XBIZ Award winners has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Right cite (talk) 17:26, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Category:AVN Award winners has been nominated for deletion
Category:AVN Award winners has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Right cite (talk) 17:26, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

New film article - Bloodlust Zombies
I created a new film article, about Bloodlust Zombies. Let me know if you want to help out with further research! Thanks very much, Right cite (talk) 03:02, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Peer review/Home Alone/archive2
Members of this project might be interested in leaving comments on the page linked above. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:29, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

The Curse of the Cat People
This article recently underwent a fairly major expansion that might need to some fresh eyes to assess. I've removed a big chuck of bio information about the film's producer, but the the plot section was expanded quite a bit and seems a bit overly detailed now. Some of the additions are probably OK, but they still might need some tweaking. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:34, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Aroused peer review
I've put the good article on the documentary film Aroused (film) for peer review at Peer review/Aroused (film)/archive1. Feedback to help improve its quality further would be appreciated, thank you, Right cite (talk) 14:20, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

New film article - Women of the White Buffalo
I created a new article about the documentary film, Women of the White Buffalo. Let me know if you want to help with further research, Right cite (talk) 22:02, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Importance scale
Hello American cinema task force members. I've recently did a major expansion in the entry for Dog Day Afternoon, and it is currently a Good Article nominee. I couldn't help but notice that the article was classed as "low importance" on the project's scale. It is also the case for Cool Hand Luke, and that Jailhouse Rock was not rated. I am aware that it is the case particularly for this productions because I worked on their GA nominations. Now, I wanted to bring your attention to the fact that all three of them were inducted into the National Film Registry for being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant". Shouldn't all the films inducted to the National Film Registry be classified as at least "high importance" regarding American Cinema? I haven't checked the status of the other films on the list, but I do think it is important to make a case for rating all the articles in the list at least as "high importance".-- GD</b><b style="color:#273BE2">uwen</b> <b style="background:#318CE7; padding:2px; color:cyan"> Holler! </b> 14:30, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Peer review/The 40-Year-Old Virgin/archive1
Can someone please leave comments for this? <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 23:49, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

WP:NFF has an RFC
WP:NFF has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Platonk (talk) 03:23, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Peer review/Ed, Edd n Eddy's Big Picture Show/archive1
Input for this PR is welcomed. <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 01:32, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

A film
The abduction of Jennifer Grayson 2017 film, should have a wikipedia page 74.89.212.125 (talk) 05:00, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Diana Walter for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diana Walter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Diana Walter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Mahāgaja · talk 12:48, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Ed, Edd n Eddy's Big Picture Show/archive1
An ongoing FAC for any task force members who are interested in reviewing it. <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 23:32, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Discussion at Content assessment
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Content assessment, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. &#x0020;This WikiProject received this message because it currently uses "Current" and/or "Future" class(es). There is a proposal to split these two article "classes" into a new parameter "time", in order to standardise article-rating across Wikipedia (per RfC), while also allowing simultaneous usage of quality criteria and time for interest projects. Thanks! &#8212;CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 21:16, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Not My Life Featured article review
I have nominated Not My Life for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:41, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

"See You On Venus" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=See_You_On_Venus&redirect=no See You On Venus] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. &mdash; Archer1234  (t·c) 16:00, 30 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Due to the lack of response, the request for discussion of See You On Venus has been relisted at Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_February_6. Readers of this page are encouraged to comment on the redirect there. &mdash;  Archer1234  (t·c) 21:30, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Snow White and the Huntsman
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Snow White and the Huntsman that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Killarnee (talk) 22:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)