Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Gastropods/Subpage listing additional suspected CopyVio articles by GB

April 2009 onwards:

After working through this list, please plan to check quickly to examine the status of related articles that are linked in the article, such as species genera or family articles, because many of these may also have copyvio.

Also please check the rest of the master list as many others remain in that list. Those listed here were extracted from the first quarter of the list at. (These are all articles that were not included in the category Molluscs of New Zealand, or Molluscs of Australia, and they have not been tagged by a bot for possible copyvio. A lot of these artices were not tagged as being in Project Gastropods.)

If you find extra articles that need fixing or that you did fix (ones that did not already have the copyvio tag), please add them to this list.

I reorganized the list alphabetically for ease of use. Invertzoo (talk) 20:13, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Instructions
Anyone who attempts to check these articles needs to bear in mind that a great deal of the copyvio was taken from books which are not available on-line, and thus googling for a phrase and not finding it is not sufficient to ensure that it is not copied.

1. The most likely section to be copied verbatim is the "Description" section. "Habitat'" and "Range" sections may also be copied verbatim or almost verbatim. Note that it is not necessary to actually rewrite copyvio sections at this stage; the highest priority is to remove copyvio material. Instead of re-writing, you can just remove the offending sections altogether or render them invisible. (If however you very much want to rewrite a section, and you are confident that you can do a good job of this, because both your prose skills and your understanding are up to the task, then feel free to do so. Remember that a light paraphrasing is not enough to remove copyvio status.)

2. When you remove a copyvio section, note that in the edit summary, and also say "see talk page".

3. On the talk page of the article, place an explanation message as is shown here:. This should help to prevent people adding back in any unimproved text from the copyvio section.

4. If it is a gastropod article which has no project gastropod template, please add one. If it has a gastropod template but the class now needs adjusting from start to stub, do so.

List: A to M

 * Achatinidae - ✅, this one seems to be OK. Invertzoo (talk) 20:09, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Acteonidae - ✅, this one seems to be OK. Invertzoo (talk) 20:11, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Aglajidae - ✅ no copyvio found. --Snek01 (talk) 19:18, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Akeridae- ✅, this one seems to be OK. Invertzoo (talk) 21:34, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Architectonica - ✅ , presumed copyvio removed, Invertzoo (talk) 00:06, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Bittium - ✅ , Copyvio removed by User:Snek01. Invertzoo (talk) 14:08, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Buccinidae - ✅ no problems found Tim Ross   (talk)  10:25, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Buccinulum - ✅ , presumed copyvio removed, Invertzoo (talk) 00:21, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Bursidae - ✅  - one article had to be copyedited to remove a possible copyvio. JoJan (talk) 15:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Caecum (genus) - ✅ , copyvio removed, also same thing was done for the family article: Caecidae. Invertzoo (talk) 21:35, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Calliostoma - ✅  JoJan (talk) 16:44, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Cancellariidae - ✅  Copyvio removed. Invertzoo (talk) 21:36, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Carinaria lamarcki - ✅  Extensive copyvio removed. Invertzoo (talk) 21:59, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Cassinae - ✅  Extensive copyvio removed. Invertzoo (talk) 22:03, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Cellana - ✅  Some small suspected copyvio removed. Invertzoo (talk) 22:56, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Cerithiidae - ✅ , suspected copyvio removed --Snek01 (talk) 16:15, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Chromodorididae - ✅, this one seems to be OK. Invertzoo (talk) 00:03, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Cirsostrema - ✅, this one seems to be OK. Invertzoo (talk) 13:06, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Clanculus - ✅  JoJan (talk) 06:26, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Columbariinae - ✅  Some suspected copyvio removed. Invertzoo (talk) 13:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Columbellidae - ✅  Some suspected copyvio removed. Invertzoo (talk) 13:19, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Cominella - ✅, this one seems to be OK. Invertzoo (talk) 13:20, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Cowry - ✅ This one is OK. Invertzoo (talk) 12:34, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Cyclostrematidae - ✅  Some suspected copyvio removed. Invertzoo (talk) 12:39, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Cylichna - ✅ , copyvio removed, Invertzoo (talk) 23:37, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Dendropoma - ✅ , copyvio removed, Invertzoo (talk) 12:47, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Dolabrifera dolabrifera - ✅ , copyvio removed, Invertzoo (talk) 12:53, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Doto (mollusc) - itself had no copyvio text, BUT the related article Doto pita I had to clean up. Invertzoo (talk) 21:46, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Duplicaria - ✅ , suspected copyvio removed, Invertzoo (talk) 12:56, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Epitonium - ✅ no problems found Invertzoo (talk) 13:56, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Eulimidae - ✅ , suspected copyvio removed, Invertzoo (talk) 13:16, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Fissurellidae aka Keyhole limpet - ✅ - copyvio rewrited --Snek01 (talk) 19:26, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Fusinus - ✅ , suspected small copyvio removed, Invertzoo (talk) 22:28, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Gastropoda - ??? I don't know if GB put any phrases or sentences into this one.
 * Glaucidae - ✅, no problems found, Invertzoo (talk) 22:54, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Henry Suter - ✅ , suspected copyvio removed --Snek01 (talk) 23:02, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Homalopoma - ✅ , suspected copyvio removed, Invertzoo (talk) 23:38, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hydrobiidae ✅ There was no copyvio. --Snek01 (talk) 10:43, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Janthina - ✅ , small amounts of suspected copyvio removed, Invertzoo (talk) 23:50, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Mitra (genus) - ✅  No CopyVio, extra text was added by me, not by GB Invertzoo (talk) 18:39, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Mollusca - ✅  JoJan (talk) 15:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

List: M to Z

 * Nassarius - ✅ , I think this is rewritten enough that it is OK. Invertzoo (talk) 18:57, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Naticidae - ✅ , I believe this is now rewritten enough that it is OK. Some copyvio removed. Invertzoo (talk) 21:11, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Neritopsidae - ✅ , no copyvio. Invertzoo (talk) 21:27, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Orthogastropoda- ✅ , this appears to be OK, Invertzoo (talk) 13:31, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Philine - ✅ , presumed copyvio removed, Invertzoo (talk) 21:34, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Placostylus- ✅ , some rewriting some removal, Invertzoo (talk) 14:04, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Polinices - ✅ , presumed copyvio removed, Invertzoo (talk) 14:09, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Potamididae - ✅ , there are 3 sentences of suspected copyvio in invisible text waiting for rewriting. --Snek01 (talk) 22:42, 2 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Powelliphanta "Augustus" -- ??? I need some help with this one, can't make out if GB put copyvio info into this or not. Invertzoo (talk) 21:35, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Powelliphanta "Lodestone"
 * Powelliphanta "Matakitaki"
 * Powelliphanta "Owen" - ✅  - already fixed, by User:Ascidian
 * Powelliphanta "vittatus"
 * Powelliphanta


 * Ranellidae - ✅ , this one seems to be OK. Invertzoo (talk) 14:14, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Rissoidae - ✅ , presumed copyvio removed, Invertzoo (talk) 14:27, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Scaphander - ✅ , presumed copyvio removed, Invertzoo (talk) 19:11, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Scissurella - ✅ , presumed copyvio removed, Invertzoo (talk) 19:16, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Scissurellidae - ✅ , presumed copyvio removed, Invertzoo (talk) 22:08, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Sinezona] - ✅ , presumed copyvio removed, Invertzoo (talk) 22:21, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Solariella - ✅ , presumed copyvio removed, Invertzoo (talk) 23:41, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Struthiolaria papulosa- ✅ , presumed copyvio removed by Anna Frodisiak previously
 * Succinea - ✅ There was no copyvio. --Snek01 (talk) 13:28, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Terebra - ✅ There was no copyvio. Invertzoo (talk) 00:20, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thais orbita- ✅ There was no copyvio. Invertzoo (talk) 12:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Tonna (genus) - ✅ , presumed copyvio removed, Invertzoo (talk) 20:05, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Trimusculidae - ✅ , this family articles is OK, re-written enough. Invertzoo (talk) 15:37, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Trivia (genus) - ✅  Copyvio removed. Invertzoo (talk) 18:39, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Trochidae - ✅ no problems found, Invertzoo (talk) 22:56, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Turbinidae - ✅ , this one seems to be OK Invertzoo (talk) 21:35, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Turridae - ✅ , presumed copyvio removed, Invertzoo (talk) 17:41, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Turritriton labiosus - this one already done by User:Moonriddengirl
 * Volvarina - ✅ , this one seems to be OK, Invertzoo (talk) 17:44, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Zeacumantus - suspected copyvio removed --Snek01 (talk) 22:33, 2 April 2

Other mollusk articles started by GB

 * Arthur William Baden Powell - ✅ ' JoJan (talk) 06:32, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Tellina - ✅ ' - no problems found, GB wrote generic opening sentence and then worked only on list Tim Ross'   (talk)  13:05, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Dosinia - ✅ ' - no problems - same situation as Tellina. Tim Ross'   (talk)  13:11, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Chiton - ✅  - no problems - GB's efforts all involved the listing.
 * Rhyssoplax - ✅  - no problems, Invertzoo (talk) 21:26, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Cadulus - ✅  - no problems, Invertzoo (talk) 21:27, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Pholadidae - ❌ - many GB edits in this family; most just involve species lists and such, and are okay; those from the first week of Feb. '07 need to be checked against the literature. Tim Ross   (talk)  21:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Dentalium (anthropology) - ✅ ' - no problems, GB just added list and illustration Tim Ross'   (talk)  21:31, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Chlamys (bivalve) - ✅ ' - cleaned up by User:Whpq. Tim Ross'   (talk)  21:51, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Ischnochiton - ✅ ' - cleaned up by User:Whpq. Tim Ross'   (talk)  22:08, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Limatula - ✅ ' - deleted suspicious description, remainder okay. Tim Ross'   (talk)  22:30, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Acanthochitona - ✅ ' - cleaned up by User:Whpq. Tim Ross'   (talk)  23:02, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Plebidonax deltoides- ✅ ' - cleaned up by User:Ascidian. Tim Ross'   (talk)  23:25, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Periplomatidae- ✅ ' - cleaned up by User:Ascidian. Tim Ross'   (talk)  16:37, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Nucula - ✅ ' - no problems - GB just added to species list. Tim Ross'   (talk)  16:47, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Chiton (genus) - ✅ ' - article clean - just list info from GB. Tim Ross'   (talk)  16:47, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Anadara - ✅ ' - cleaned up by User:Whpq. Tim Ross'   (talk)  16:49, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

NOTE: Remember this is not a complete extract from the main list. I stopped less than a quarter of the way through the main list because I was getting tired. Invertzoo (talk) 21:05, 14 March 2009 (UTC) There are plenty more on the main bot-created list to extract and add to these lists. See

Note to editors who have worked on this list
Those of you who do not have access to a copy of Powell's book, which appears to have been GB's primary source and which is not available on-line, how are you determining that there is no CopyVio? Please answer here to let us know, thanks, Invertzoo (talk) 15:46, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, in the two I checked, Calliostoma and Buccinidae, there was only a general opening followed by the species lists; no detailed descriptions, which seem to constitute most of the problem if I understand properly. Let me know if I misunderstand the situation. Tim Ross   (talk)  16:01, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


 * In the Calliostoma article, I personally would want to check this sentence "The name of this genus is derived from the Greek words kallos (beautiful) and stoma (mouth), referring to the pearly aperture" against the relevant text in the Powell book, assuming that sentence was one of GB's edits. The Buccinidae article is probably fine as it stands though.
 * In general only the very first sentence of these articles is good to go, the rest of the text of an intro may often be quite suspect, especially when the prose sounds sort of elegant and a little bit antiquated. Thanks for replying and very best wishes to you, Invertzoo (talk) 22:24, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the insight. I do wish I had Powell's book here! Unchecked that listing. Tim Ross   (talk)  09:08, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Anyone else want to reply?
 * That phrase in Calliostoma is mine. I've been adding some general description and many more species to the list of this extremely large genus. JoJan (talk) 16:50, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * OK, good, thanks JoJan for telling us that. Best, Invertzoo (talk) 17:34, 18 March 2009 (UTC)