Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Graphic design

Requested move at Talk:Color code
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Color code that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — Shibboleth ink  (♔ ♕) 22:56, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Who is active on WikiProject Graphic Design?
Hello, I am one of a group of practitioners, educators, and librarians who want to start working on graphic design related content in Wikipedia. We are trying to locate who is active in this Wikiproject, as we think we will have a fair amount of energy to bring to the topic. Please feel free to ping me and let me know with whom I might communicate. Thank you, Oughtta Be Otters (talk) 01:56, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Following up here. Wondering if any of the early members of the group are still editing? @Oicumayberight, @Steveluscher, @Hitrish, @Chelt -- wondering if any of you are still following this project? Thank you, Oughtta Be Otters (talk) 18:44, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, I realise this was posted over a year ago, but am also keen to increase the coverage of graphic design (studios, disciplines, practitioners, publications and critics). I have a draft in submission currently and looking to see how it might be improved. Thanks! Looktowindward (talk) 18:30, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

User script to detect unreliable sources
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like and turns it into something like
 * John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
 * John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from cite web, cite journal and doi.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Proper WP:VA listing
At Wikipedia_talk:Vital_articles/Level/5, we are discussing the proper listing of, which is the famous first use of the as a logograph for the word love, leading to ubiquitous use of I ... in marketing materials worldwide. It got listed as a specific work of visual arts. I want to make sure that no one has a problem with moving it from specific works of art. If anyone has an opinion, drop a note there.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 01:23, 14 January 2024 (UTC)