Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Greater Manchester/Assessment

The Longdendale Bypass
Longdendale Bypass has been assessed as Low Importance, used for "suburbs, small stations/metro stops, branch libraries, leisure centres, Grade II listed buildings, local parks". I would have put such a thorny issues that is raising so many hackles much higher. The current rating feels like a POV. Given that it has the attention of major national agencies such as CPRE, Highways Agency and has been rumbling for some 20 years I would say it was High: "major structural elements of Greater Manchester, or subjects of UK importance" PeterIto (talk) 00:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Assessment scale
Wouldn't something with examples from the Greater Manchester project be more relevant for the table of assessment guidelines? I've made up an example here, and it's easily edited:

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Nev1 (talk • contribs) 14:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Of course it should yes, don't know why this has still not been done. I'll let you do it seen as you suggested it. └ and-rew ┘┌ talk ┐ 17:23, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Merseyside
Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection before December 2008, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 16:14, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Article alerts
This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the  parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {{{sup|ταλκ}}κοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:24, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)