Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Horror/Archive 5

Re-emergence
I don't want this project to die, so I think we need to come up with some suggestions as to how we can revitalise this project. A drive might be nice, using articles from, the cleanup listing here, to try and attract new members. Any other suggestions would be most welcome. Also, do you think it would be appropriate if was named honourary coordinator emeritus, even though he's not active anymore, but he did try hard to relaunch the project way back in 2009, which is an impressive feat really. Anyway, let's try and keep this project going.--TÆRkast (Communicate) 19:30, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Another useful thing would be to expand the Horror portal as well as the Horror section on the Speculative fiction portal. They are both very good ways to promote the genre.Even if people weren't comfortable making the changes themselves (especially on P:SF, as the setup there is more complicated than on many other portals), offering suggestions for what could be improved is always helpful and appreciated. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WikiProject Japan ! 19:54, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * That is a good idea. We've got a lot of work cut out for us, but I think we can make it happen.--TÆRkast (Communicate) 20:09, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * You know, I had another idea in order to concentrate things a little more and make it easier to take care of in the future: what about merging the Horror portal into the Horror section of the Speculative fiction portal? It could be made to appear like the main page there (as far as amount of content). All of the content could be included easily. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WikiProject Japan ! 04:23, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Maybe this project should have collaborate on an article to make it a Featured Article. If enough members work on it together and get it to FAC, maybe some more editors might join the project because of the collab. GamerPro64 (talk) 05:07, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * That could be useful, too. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WikiProject Japan ! 05:30, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I've been working on The Texas Chain Saw Massacre for about 2 years now, it's recently failed its fourth FAC, but this year I'm hoping for it to make FA status. So maybe that could be the project? --TÆRkast (Communicate) 14:16, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * That sounds like a good article to start. Maybe a collaboration page should be made first. GamerPro64 (talk) 21:28, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, the current collaboration page could probably do with a revamp.--TÆRkast (Communicate) 21:50, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm all for boosting the community. I think focusing on one article to tackle for as a featured article might be a bit much, as basically not everyone has seen The Texas Chainsaw Massacre. I think if we just boost more community interaction and support, it would get more people interested in the project. My suggestions would include a newsletter and finding editors who tackle horror related projects or article to invite them to to the project and have people stay with newsletters, better peer review support and such. Do we have a Horror-invite template? Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:24, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * With regards to Chain Saw, it's OK, I'll continue to work on the article until it reaches FA. I know it isn't the easiest article to work on, but it's one 2+ years in the making. Just if anybody's interested. As far as I'm aware, there isn't a horror invite template, but we could create one, then post it to related projects, e.g. WP:FILM, WP:VG etc. --<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (<b style="color:maroon">Communicate</b>) 21:41, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Did someone say newsletter? If we are making one, can I be editor in chief? I work on WP:VG's newsletter from time to time. GamerPro64 (talk) 02:39, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure, I think a newsletter is a great idea, and you're welcome to be editor in chief. We need to think of content to put in it now. Once we manage to get a fair few participants, probably a few months down the line, we may then start to think about elections for the Coordinator posititons.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (<b style="color:maroon">Communicate</b>) 11:46, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, does anybody think another interview in The Signpost would be productive to the project in recruiting new members? --<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (<b style="color:maroon">Communicate</b>) 12:18, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * For the newsletter, here is the Outreach department of the project, and a possible revival of Collaboration as well. These are things we should be aiming to do.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (<b style="color:maroon">Communicate</b>) 13:43, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey! We go mentioned at WikiProject Film's Newsletter. GamerPro64 (talk) 21:34, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Awesome! I missed that part. Good catch.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (<b style="color:maroon">Communicate</b>) 21:50, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Also, as a sidenote, I'm going to be having a bit of down time soon until February to focus on real-life stuff, i.e. exams, so somebody else may want to take charge in the interim. Very loosely related to this, if we do manage to get coordinator elections going again, I doubt I'll be running for Coordinator, but we'll see. Let's get this project back on its feet.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (<b style="color:maroon">Communicate</b>) 22:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I've created a to-do list which can be seen in the main project page. Feel free to edit it.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (<b style="color:maroon">Communicate</b>) 22:44, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I have placed the first nomination for collaboration here. GamerPro64 (talk) 01:28, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Newsletter
O.k, before we bring the newsletter back, we need to talk about what changes it needs, like if an issue is monthly or quarterly and other stuff like that. GamerPro64 (talk) 21:34, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd love it to be monthly. But for now I'd say either quarterly or bi-monthly. I do not think we have enough activity to warrant it being it monthly yet. Any other opinions? 99.241.142.34 (talk) 15:20, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree, we need to build up our member base first, and that's the tricky part.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (<b style="color:maroon">Communicate</b>) 16:37, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Any new ideas? --<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (<b style="color:maroon">Communicate</b>) 21:10, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm in favor of the creation of a horror-invite template, like Andrzejbanas mentioned above. I think it would greatly help to attract new members who don't know there's a Wikiproject dedicated to horror. Kaguya-chan (talk) 21:50, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I think both a newsletter and invite-template would be helpful in attracting new members. With regards to the invite template, how is it going to be sent? --<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (<b style="color:maroon">Communicate</b>) 22:18, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, a newsletter would help too. With the invite, that's where it gets tricky (probably not the words you wanted to read). I think the members of the Horror Wikiproject should keep our eyes peeled for people who edit horror-related articles reasonably frequently and send them an invite. It's not a method for recruiting masses of members at one time, but one that will bring results over time. Or not. Personally, I think the problem facing this Wikiproject is that not enough people know about it. Kaguya-chan (talk) 22:43, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I can think of one person who may be interested in joining. As for sending invites, MuZemike has a bot that could do stuff like that. GamerPro64 (talk) 00:30, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Sounds good.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (<b style="color:maroon">Communicate</b>) 13:17, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * One way to find candidates is to check for "contributors" in certain articles like the ones for classic horror icons. Anyone who has edited one of them substantially and is still active could be a candidate. For example, The Amityville Horror shows that User:Ianmacm has worked substantially on it. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 17:28, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * That's a good idea, well worth doing.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (<b style="color:maroon">Communicate</b>) 17:49, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, I've placed a hidden underconstruction template at the Outreach department, where the newsletter is, and might do the same for the Collaboration department. These, and an invite template, should be our top priority now. I still won't be very active until the end of January, but others are welcome to make the changes. Also, feel free to update the todo list in the main Prokect page.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (<b style="color:maroon">Communicate</b>) 22:17, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, we're gonna have to get started sooner or later. Perhaps setting a specific date for work to begin might help. Thoughts? --<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (<b style="color:maroon">Communicate</b>) 14:09, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Would it be possible to get something going by mid Feb? Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:23, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Hopefully, my exams will be over by then (until the next ones), and a good 2 months I'll be able to do stuff as well, so hopefully that's possible.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (<b style="color:maroon">Communicate</b>) 16:30, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright, I'm going to see if any other horror project pages need cleaning up and updating, in the mean time, perhaps a Coordinator election should be held earlier than expected, which may help, but that's just an idea. We should probably get to work on the Newsletter.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (<b style="color:maroon">Communicate</b>) 19:19, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll try to start a draft this week if I have any free time. GamerPro64 (talk) 00:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * OK no probs.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (<b style="color:maroon">Communicate</b>) 20:39, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright, I started up the newsletter. If anyone has any suggestions on what to add to the newsletter draft, please make it at the Newsletter tip line. GamerPro64 (talk) 00:26, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * OK. Will do.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (<b style="color:maroon">Communicate</b>) 17:41, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Devil May Cry 2
So DVC2 is on the edge of being at FAR. if anyone wants to revamp the article to make it meet FA criteria, you can see its talk page of its concerns. GamerPro64 (talk) 03:04, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

2011 Rollcall
Sign here if you're still with us.
 * 1) <b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (<b style="color:maroon">Communicate</b>) 16:52, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Kaguya-chan (talk) 17:57, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) GamerPro64 (talk) 18:48, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:48, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) This seems a little silly since you can see all of us interacting above. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WikiProject Japan ! 18:05, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) I just joined. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  22:29, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Welcome to the Project.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (<b style="color:maroon">Communicate</b>) 18:50, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 1)    BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  20:00, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) —<span style="solid;background:#5D8AA8; border-radius: 8px; -moz-border-radius: 8px; font-family: Segoe Print"> Mike   Allen   00:33, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) LovelyLillith (talk)LovelyLillith (talk) 22:53, 16 April 2011 (UTC) Fashionably late to the party, as always...new to this particular project.

Task Center
We could use the (currently inactive) the Task Center as a starting point for stuff. I think it's a good idea to start from there. Thoughts? --<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (<b style="color:maroon">Communicate</b>) 19:43, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I like it. I've already have been calling myself editor-in-chief, might as well say that I am the "Newsletter editor". GamerPro64 (talk) 22:05, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Attention everyone. Is anyone else interested in holding a position in the Task Center? GamerPro64 (talk) 00:57, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I guess as the Coordinator, I go under Project Promoter.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (<b style="color:maroon">Communicate</b>) 13:07, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

List of A Nightmare on Elm Street characters
Hi all, I recently revamped this article because it looked like this: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_A_Nightmare_on_Elm_Street_characters&diff=414845182&oldid=413566705

Why it looked like this when its part of what is not a tiny franchise, I don't know, but I've gone over the entire thing to bring it in line with the List of Saw characters and List of Scream characters as quick examples so it now looks like this.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_A_Nightmare_on_Elm_Street_characters

I've done the best I can as I don't really have much knowledge of the films between 2 and New Nightmare, but I'm looking for input basically. I don't personally plan on doing anymore to it but I think I've done the bulk for anyone who wants to make any touches.Darkwarriorblake (talk) 20:22, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Important: Coordinator Election page
I made the first steps towards an election by creating the election page, I think it's an important step towards the revival of the project, and anybody can chip in towards improving the page. Thanks, --<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (<b style="color:maroon">Communicate</b>) 22:26, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Requesting peer review
I'm requesting a peer review of Friday the 13th (franchise). See Peer review/Friday the 13th (franchise)/archive2 for the page. I'm looking for editors that have not significantly contributed to the page (so it's as neutral and independent as possible) to point out descrepancies or issues that need to be answered by another FAC. It's been through 2 copy edits by the League of Copy Editors so I'm hoping there are not any copy editing issues.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  19:50, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Pageview stats
After a recent request, I added WikiProject Horror to the list of projects to compile monthly pageview stats for. The data is the same used by http://stats.grok.se/en/ but the program is different, and includes the aggregate views from all redirects to each page. The stats are at WikiProject Horror/Popular pages.

The page will be updated monthly with new data. The edits aren't marked as bot edits, so they will show up in watchlists. You can view more results, request a new project be added to the list, or request a configuration change for this project using the toolserver tool. If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know. Thanks! Mr.Z-man 00:24, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Maniac Mansion
Can I get some opinions on if Maniac Mansion falls onto the project? Link GamerPro64 (talk) 18:26, 3 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't know if I'd call it scary but its definitely horror based.Darkwarriorblake (talk) 15:30, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

The Incredible Melting Man
Just letting everyone know that The Incredible Melting Man is having a community reassessment due to it being quick-failed. Please comment on it. GamerPro64 (talk) 04:25, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

FAC nomination needs editors...FAST
The FAC nomination for The Texas Chain Saw Massacre is in desperate need of editors voicing opinions, supports, or opposes. This is the fifth nomination and again it's being ignored by reviewers. Previous attempts have failed because of inactivity and not enough people supporting or opposing the article. It's one thing for everyone to say "this is wrong and it needs to be fixed" and another when they don't even bother to show up for support period. User:TaerkastUA has put a lot of work into this article and it's only fair that we band together and do what we can to either support its promotion, or point out any issues that need to be addressed. Please visit Featured article candidates/The Texas Chain Saw Massacre/archive5 and help save this FAC from being closed because of inactivity.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  16:04, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Update - The FAC was restarted. So if you want to support or make a new comment on the FAC, please do so. GamerPro64 (talk) 00:43, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Is this project inactive/dead?
I'm starting to look at the amount of inactivity on the part of this project, lack of discussion, and the near-2 year backlog on article assessments and I'm forced to question as to this project's status. I'm honestly just short of running under the assumption that it's dead. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ ②  16:49, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi, firstly, I would like to direct you to the first section of this talk page called Re-emergence, which shows that we do have a small group of active editors still willing to edit. As is discussed there, we're trying to revitalise this project, so, it's not dead, just very, very inactive until we can come up with something to attract new participants.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (<b style="color:maroon">Communicate</b>) 16:59, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I missed that so my apologies. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ  ②  19:06, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Nah, it's OK. I really don't want this project to die out, so we do need to come up with something, I was thinking of a coordinator's election at this page, but I doubt that would attract much.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (<b style="color:maroon">Communicate</b>) 19:12, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

NAncy Thompson/Nancy Holbrook
Should Nancy Holbrook actually be on the Nancy Thompson page? They share base similarities at best, they are not the same character except in first name. Apart from the fate of her mother and the fact she brings Freddy into the real world they share no direct story traits any more than she does with whatserface from Freddy Vs Jason Darkwarriorblake (talk) 19:34, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Coordinator Election
I know we don't have a lot of members at the moment, but maybe holding a coordinator election may bring some attention to us. Anybody interested could add their name. I really don't want this project to die, for Hornoir's sake who tried hard to breathe some new life into this project.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (<b style="color:maroon">Communicate</b>) 20:13, 25 March 2011 (UTC)


 * OK. We seem to have a bit more members, so I think holding the election will definitely be useful. --<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (Discuss) 11:26, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Requesting Opinions at Peer Review
I am putting Friday the 13th (2009 film) up for peer review, and I am soliciting as many opinions as possible. Please come to the peer review discussion page to voice your critiques.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  20:28, 27 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Bumping this. I've received one editor's comments. I would really appreciate a few more before the peer review is archived. Thanks.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  01:17, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Requesting additional opinions
There is a discussion at Jason Voorhees regarding continuity and other similar issues. I am not entirely sure what is being proposed, but please come to the page and read over the discussion and voice your opinions. See Talk: Jason Voorhees.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  05:28, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Media franchises is up for deletion
I have nominated WikiProject Media franchises for deletion at WP:MFD. Please comment here for any concerns. Thank for your time. Regards, JJ98 (Talk)  09:00, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Silent Hill (video game)'s RFC
There is a RFC for Silent Hill due to "unsourced statements (possible original research) to the article's plot section". Please comment here. GamerPro64 (talk) 00:42, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Scores, soundtracks and incidental music
I added this to what the project is about, please correct if I'm wrong; I think there are some pieces of music that are unquestionably identified with certain fictional horror themes, such as Tubular Bells, Hello Zepp, the theme from Halloween, etc. and thus should be included in the project. LovelyLillith (talk) 12:22, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Requesting additional opinions (again)
I'm requesting additional opinions at Talk:Jason Voorhees. There is a disagreement as to whether someone deserves credit in the infobox for portraying a character in a single scene. One party says yes, and the other disagrees. Others are encouraged to come and weigh in so that we can have this matter settled because it's just turning into an edit war.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  00:44, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Active?
Is this Horror WikiProject still active? I've noticed that removed the semi-active tag. Also, I am starting to feel that the notice board of the Horror WikiProject is inactive since there is no activity. JJ98 (Talk)  11:51, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I can honestly say that this project is active. I have been updating the front page everytime an article becomes a Good Article. GamerPro64  14:31, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It is active, but not as much as it could be. We've been trying to come up with ideas to recruit new members.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (Discuss) 15:03, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The project is plenty active; we just don't always discuss things here as there's not always a need for it. Please go find something else to do that tag projects for deletion and inactivity when there is clearly activity. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WikiProject Japan ! 01:54, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Signpost Report on Project revival
an interesting Signpost report on Wikiproject revival, seems to really put things into perspective. My coordinator election idea has stalled for now, we need some new ideas, but more importantly, to be able to implement them.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (Discuss) 19:00, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

The Human Centipede (First Sequence) FAC
Hi there, in case anyone is interested, The Human Centipede (First Sequence) is currently a featured article candidate. Any constructive comments on the article review would be very much appreciated and would help us to get the article to FA. Cya! Coolug (talk) 09:53, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey, in case anyone is interested, this FA review was closed with the article not promoted due to the lack of comments. cya Coolug (talk) 13:07, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

second go at FAC for the human centipede
Hi. Yes I know it's a terrible terrible film, but a lot of work has been put into The Human Centipede (First Sequence) and it would be really helpful if any editors could help out with any constructive criticism on the Featured Article review. A month or so ago the FAC was closed because there were hardly any comments, but I still feel the article meets the standard so I've put it up again. Any comments whatsoever would very much be appreciated. Thanks (Oh yeah, here's the link :) Featured article candidates/The Human Centipede (First Sequence)/archive2) cya Coolug (talk) 15:52, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
 * hey there, there have been a few very useful comments on the article, which I have done my best to act on. If anyone else out there has anything else they say about the article I'd really appreciate it. cya Coolug (talk) 20:53, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Gremlins 2: The New Batch FAR
nominated Gremlins 2: The New Batch for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. JJ98 (Talk)  10:40, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Request for Comment
Re Wrong Turn 2: Dead End. Recently, an editor, User:87Stone, has edited the plot summary's fairly good English into what is clearly poor English which appears to be written by someone whose native language is not English. I have reverted him twice, but he persists in restoring his own odd version. He has not provided a single edit summary to justify these changes. Since I originally rewrote this section myself (it was formerly not in very good English and contained a number of inaccuracies), and therefore do not wish to be seen to be laying claim to the section's ownership, and also do not wish to revert him three times, I would appreciate comment on the talk page on these edits. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:43, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

redlink American zombie

 * redlink American zombie – Ling.Nut 04:55, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Strawpoll. How many want to make being on the bestseller's list proof of notability for a book?
Please come participate in the discussion and poll. Thank you. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WikiProject Japan ! 17:58, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Images
So, I'm looking for a freely licensed image to go in the infobox for horror writer M. Alice LeGrow (Bizenghast). Any help would be greatly appreciated. Kaguya-chan (talk) 21:51, 6 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Hello! You can try to look for images on Flickr and ask the copyright holder to change an image's license to Creative Commons Attribution or Attribution-ShareAlike. I did this with Alex Tse and Jane Hamsher. You could ask for the copyright holder of this image to change the license, and you can create a derivative work that can crop that image into more of a portrait. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 23:11, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Future of this project
I have some thoughts about what to do with this project and its future.


 * This project is hanging on by a thread
 * I'm planning to attempt another FAC on The Texas Chain Saw Massacre.
 * I want to hold a coordinator election at some point.
 * We need more members.
 * The newsletter has stalled, we need to revive it (again).
 * Looking at the cleanup listing might help active participation, i.e. a cleanup drive or something.

You are all free to add your own thoughts.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (Discuss) 18:54, 17 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Anybody? --<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (Discuss) 15:43, 19 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I think these are all great ideas, I just wish I could help. I don't have a lot of time right now to do much on here, let alone help revive this project. :(   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  15:50, 19 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, I'll do what I can. Chain Saw is my top priority, although the FAC will no doubt be another onslaught of reviewers.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (Discuss) 17:38, 19 July 2011 (UTC)


 * How about an auto assessment? I've created a category subpage myself that will automatically assess by a bot. It is possible to do that? JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  04:34, 20 July 2011 (UTC)


 * That's not a bad idea at all. Should be possible.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (Discuss) 11:07, 20 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Agree. The auto parameter still exists on the banner. I've made few changes on the WikiProject Horror project banner myself, including the peer review parameter. It looks like can auto assess any horror fiction-related articles and that would save the project. I go request it myself. Please note that this may take while. Remember, this WikiProject is about the horror fiction genre, not the emotion. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  00:32, 21 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Concur with Bignole. I'm still watching and I still keep an eye on a lot of project related articles.  I just haven't had a lot of time lately.  But I think your ideas are great and I'd be happy to pitch in more than just watching articles if/when my schedule clears up.  Millahnna (talk) 04:51, 20 July 2011 (UTC)


 * It's no easy task for sure, but I refuse to let this project fail. Kind of carrying on from the work of who tried revitalising this project two years ago, but hasn't edited since. I'll see what I can do to bring life back into this project.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (Discuss) 11:07, 20 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Perhaps some could volunteer for the jobs at the Task Center. I'll also request another interview at the Signpost and get the Coordinator Election started--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (Discuss) 18:36, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah bugger. I would like to work on the Newsletter again but I need some assistance with it. We could rework the format to be like WikiProject Video games/Newsletter. GamerPro64  22:41, 1 August 2011 (UTC)


 * I like it. I'll help if I can. As for the overall project, I believe the Task Center should be a starting point for any sort of revival.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (Discuss) 13:29, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Sorry for the late reply! For the new members issue, we could create something similar to this as an invitation:


 * Of course, the invitation above is only an example. It would be a good way of letting other editors know about the project. Kaguya-chan (talk) 05:01, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * That's an excellent idea.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (Discuss) 11:25, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree, I think it's a great way to get more members to the project and revitalize it.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  12:51, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi, I haven't had a look at your contributions, but have you been adding any comments to other FAC reviews? This might encourage other users to give their two cents on the Texas Chain Saw Massacre article. Good luck with the project. cya Coolug (talk) 16:15, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I like your suggestions and would be very happy to see a revival of this project. I have been making my way through the history of horror films, watching them with with my wife (god bless her), and attempting to provide importance and quality assessments to all of the horror films as we go - we're in 1968 right now.  I try to put my assessments in larger context (i.e. not just my opinion of the film), supported by comprehensive texts such as Worland 2006 and Hardy 1995.  Also, I've put a lot of effort into the List of horror films, which is, I feel, a foundation of my personal project, as well as that of this wikiproject.


 * I would be willing to volunteer in the Assessment Department, with the caveat that I don't realistically expect to assess everything in the near term (>3/4 of the nearly 10,000 articles lack importance assessments). I would also like to see a revival of discussions on Top-importance articles.  There seem to be a lot more of them listed in the assessment table than are listed in WP:WikiProject_Horror/Assessment/Top-importance.  Have they all been discussed at some point? Sp4cetiger (talk) 21:15, 9 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your reply. It's good to know there's still interest. As for the discussion of importance of articles, I doubt a lot, if any, has taken place so far, due to our numbers. I'm still interested in an election this year, but I'm not sure how we'd go about that right now, I did create that page in the hope of holding one this year.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (Discuss) 13:56, 10 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Considering how little involvement there is in the project at the moment, I'm not sure how meaningful it would be to elect multiple coordinators. Perhaps if we held a single election for coordinator, that person could designate the other positions as they saw fit.  Then if involvement increased in the future, we could add more elected positions.  Since the coordinators don't hold any real power and the project is in dire straits, I think we should emphasize efficiency over equity -- that is, minimize the number of formal steps involved in getting things done. Considering your experience and interest, I think you would be a natural candidate for the position.  Sp4cetiger (talk) 17:15, 11 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, our organzation is basically, 1 Coordinator, 1 Deputy, and maybe assistants, but that may be phased out. 2 people basically. I suppose I could continue in the interim, although delegating positions may be difficult due to time restraints on the part of our editors.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (Discuss) 11:37, 12 September 2011 (UTC)


 * OK, I guess I'll stand for the coordinator election, just to put the page to some use. Can somebody check over the page, I'm not sure I've set it up properly.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (Discuss) 12:19, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Book reports
BTW, if you haven't noticed, the book reports for Wikipedia books have been extensively tweaked to help editors assess and cleanup articles. See for example Book talk:Friday the 13th, which are automatically updated by User:NoomBot every few days. Features include breakdowns of article assessments, lists of cleanup tags found in the article, lists of non-free media, and a bunch of links to tools likes the external links inspector or the disambiguation fixer. Books and their talkpages can pretty much acts as mini-wikiprojects / mini-taskforces. One could easily make Book:Evil Dead and Book:Alfred Hitcock (or zillions of others), and work on Evil Dead / Hitchcock as a "topic/project/taskforce" or something.

Many books are created at WP:FTC, but you don't need to wait until then to gain their benefits (just click on "create a book" on the left sidebar and use the book creator tool, or create them "manually" by following Help:Books/for experts). Just thought I'd let you know. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 07:05, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Halloween
Halloween is coming up, and is of special significance to this project, so I think we should come up with something special to do this month. Any ideas? --<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (Discuss) 12:30, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Last year I tried to make a little effort to get more Horror related articles related to the Halloween "Did You Know?" section of wikipedia. We could try to do that again! Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:16, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 * That's a good idea. 1 October would've been a good date for a DYK on The Texas Chain Saw Massacre.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (Discuss) 16:25, 16 October 2011 (UTC)


 * How about doing a Collaboration of the Month project?--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (Discuss) 18:30, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
 * In case anyone's interested, there's a discussion about having The Human Centipede (First Sequence) on the main page. Some think this is a good idea, others do not. Thoughts always appreciated :) See Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests cya! Coolug (talk) 07:04, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Another good call. The other articles on bats aren't a bad idea either, but I'm supporting this one for the project. Great work again on that FA by the way! Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:16, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Speaking of the Collaboration of the Month project, can we start with Eraserhead, it has four supports. GamerPro64  20:15, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Good idea, that can get it going again, and maybe as time goes on more people will join in. We'll need to start gathering sources for this collaboration, then a copyedit, who knows, it might end up one day at FA status. P.S. I did add my name to the election page which, while not much, serves a purpose at least. It's more like a formality, but I'd like to put that page to at least some use.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (Discuss) 20:55, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Hey, in case you guys are interested, I've properly nominated the article now, you can support/oppose/comment on the nomination at Today's featured article/requests. Thanks! Coolug (talk) 10:42, 26 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Supported it :) Good luck.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (Discuss) 14:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Any one else who would like to support/oppose/comment on the nomination, there's still plenty of time to have your say! All comments are very much appreciated! Coolug (talk) 10:50, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Request for input on potential project
I have made a WikiProject proposal based off of The Walking Dead. I would like some input. Thanks in advanced. —DAP388 (talk) 15:43, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I think it might work better as a task force here. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 04:35, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Request for input
Hi everybody! and I have been having a bit of a civil discussion here over whether or not character occupations should be considered trivia or not, and what to do with the Silent Hill character list, as I understand it. Input from project members would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, Kaguya-chan (talk) 19:58, 1 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Happy New Year! So, Hula Hup and I were wondering if anyone here could think of a better title for "List of Silent Hill, Silent Hill 2, and Silent Hill 3 characters". Any input is greatly welcome and always appreciated! Thank you, Kaguya-chan (talk) 17:30, 5 January 2012 (UTC)


 * What was wrong with "list of Silent Hill characters?". Alternatively, "List of Silent Hill video game characters" or "List of characters in the Silent Hill franchise". Actually, why is Homecoming (and the others) left out?--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (Discuss) 17:39, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * They lacked information about them that wasn't plot summary (for example, design commentary). (There's actually a long, long discussion about that if you have the time.) If you found any, that's awesome! Kaguya-chan (talk) 17:45, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Review on Night of the Living Dead
nominated Night of the Living Dead for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. --George Ho (talk) 02:31, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

WikiWomen's History Month
Hi everyone. March is Women's History Month and I'm hoping a few folks here at WP:Horror will have interest in putting on events related to women's horror history - from actors to writers, characters, etc. We've created an event page on English Wikipedia (please translate!) and I hope you'll find the inspiration to participate. These events can take place off wiki, like edit-a-thons, or on wiki, such as themes and translations. Please visit the page here: WikiWomen's History Month. Thanks for your consideration and I look forward to seeing events take place! SarahStierch (talk) 19:10, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

category question
Is the category:Vampires in written fiction supposed to have all articles that are already in the subcats?--Cattus talk 00:21, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't think so, looking at it, a lot of the articles within would not squarely fit into the current sub-categories. It doesn't you can't re-file the ones which could be in more specific sub-categories. Sorry for the slow response. Someoneanother 01:47, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

The Rocky Horror Picture Show
I lowered the rating to start, but this may be to low to some so, please feel free to adjust as the project sees fit. The article had a great deal of unsourced material, but some may still see this as a possible C class. Unsure, so I am making note on all the projects for input.--Amadscientist (talk) 07:32, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

New article on film director Oliver Blackburn
I've created this new article. If you've got additional input for secondary sources, please feel free to suggest them at the article's talk page, I'd really appreciate it. :) Cheers, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 07:43, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Oliver Blackburn

Portal:Arts for featured portal consideration
I've nominated Portal:Arts for featured portal candidacy, discussion is at Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Arts. Thank you for your time, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 20:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Portal:Arts

New article on music composer François-Eudes Chanfrault
I've created this new article. If you've got additional input for secondary sources, please feel free to suggest them at the article's talk page, I'd really appreciate it. :) Cheers, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 06:50, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * François-Eudes Chanfrault

New article on British actress Sian Breckin
I've created this new article. If you've got additional input for secondary sources, please feel free to suggest them at the article's talk page, I'd really appreciate it. :) Cheers, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 23:07, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Sian Breckin

Resignation as Coordinator
It is with great reluctance thar I resign as Coordinator of the project. I feel I no longer have the time to be able to do what is expected of a Coordinator, and that as the Coordinator, I didn't really do a great job in anycase. It was good to serve though, and this does coincide with my semi-retirement, and possible eventual complete retirement from Wikipedia. I do have one last project to take to FA though, related to horror, and those that have seen or worked with me on the project know what it is :) So I hope my replacement (if there is one, I'd like to think there'd be) would be able to do a much better job than I have in revitalising the project. Thank you to all of you. --<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (Discuss) 17:33, 1 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you for all your work as coordinator. Don't be so harsh on yourself, okay? Kaguya-chan (talk) 01:59, 2 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Well, I'll try not to be :) I'd like to think that could be made Honorary Coordinator, for everything he did for the project during 2008/2009 in an attempt to revitalise it. He certainly deserves it. As for the future, I'd certainly like for their to be a new Coordinator and another attempt to jumpstart the Project again.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (Discuss) 12:58, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for what you've done, all the best. Someoneanother 02:48, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

List of The Walking Dead (TV series) characters
The page List of The Walking Dead (TV Series) characters is practically a duplicate of List of The Walking Dead (TV series) characters. The only difference in the title, is the capitalization of the word "series", and per Wikipedia policy it should NOT be capitalized. Since both lists are large and may have had different information added to them, they should be merged instead of doing a simple redirect, so that no original information is missed. Fortdj33 (talk) 20:23, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * They appear to be re-directing now. All done! Andrzejbanas (talk) 00:27, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Halloween III on Featured Article Review
I have nominated Halloween III: Season of the Witch for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. George Ho (talk) 18:23, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Films about the ten plagues of Egypt
The section "in popular culture" (present in many articles) adds not impoverishes. In fact I am amazed that a year and half ago has been removed. See this discussion: Section "in popolare culture". --Kasper2006 (talk) 23:03, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

New article on actor Robert Boulter
I've created this new article. If you've got additional input for secondary sources, please feel free to suggest them at the article's talk page, I'd really appreciate it. :) Cheers, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 19:14, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Robert Boulter

Resident Evil box issue
The table at the bottom of the RE articles is currently:

Can i ask why Operation Raccoon City is classified as a Spin off? Except for the option to kill Leon at then end there don't appear to be any other things to class it as a spin off and it fits in with the other games in the series fine. The option to kill Leon makes no difference anyway if you choose to let him go or if the team died fighting him. Thanks ツ Je no va  20  (email) 08:50, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Freedom of speech = New WikiProject
Hi there, I'm notifying this WikiProject due to its relevance to Freedom of speech. I've recently gone ahead and created WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech. If you're interested, here are some easy things you can do: Thank you for your interest in Freedom of speech, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 22:33, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech
 * 1) List yourself as a participant in the WikiProject, by adding your username here: WikiProject_Freedom_of_speech.
 * 2) Add userbox User Freedom of speech to your userpage, which lists you as a member of the WikiProject.
 * 3) Tag relevant talk pages of articles and other relevant pages using WikiProject Freedom of speech.
 * 4) Join in discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Freedom of speech.
 * 5) Notify others you think might be interested in Freedom of speech to join the WikiProject.

American Horror Story GA reassessment
I've started one, due to recent restructuring. Please check it out. — WylieCoyote (talk) 01:21, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Featured article review/Halloween II/archive1
Halloween II is under Featured Article review; join in discussion. --George Ho (talk) 17:49, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Halloween series navbox
Following on from the above, there's been some discussion on the Halloween series navbox about how best to format it, and I'd like to invite any input or feedback about the current or proposed templates to try to establish a consensus. Much appreciated! -- xensyria T 08:38, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Women's History Month is in March
Hi everyone at WikiProject Horror!

Women's history month is around the corner, in March, and we're planning the second WikiWomen's History Month.

This event, which is organized by volunteers from the WikiWomen's Collaborative, supports improving coverage about women's history during the month of March. Events take place both offline and online. We are encouraging WikiProjects to focus on women's history related to their subject for the month of March. Ideas include:
 * Biographies about women who are actors, characters, writers, producers, directors, or authors of horror
 * Key articles that focus on research and studies about horror and women

We hope you'll participate! You can list your your project focus here, and also help improve our to-do list. Thank you for all you do for Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 20:37, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Traditional ghost stories
I noticed that the this project's template as placed on every article it covers says "fictional horror". However, the articles Kaidan and Tales of Moonlight and Rain are also in here. "Kaidan" in Japanese tend to refer to folk-tales featuring ghosts, but not necessarily "horror fiction" (in that many of them were taken as historical). Similarly, Tales of Moonlight and Rain is a collection of Japanese adaptations of old Chinese ghost stories, but Ghosts in Chinese culture is not in here. Additionally, the word kaidan in English originates in the book of the same name, but that article also isn't covered here (even though the film version is). elvenscout742 (talk) 08:13, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Horror films custom search
Hi, I've created a Google's custom search engine based on the sites listed at User:MichaelQSchmidt/Reliable sources for horror films. The administrator that approved this external link suggested that a Wikiproject should adopt it, and this seems to be the most adequate one. Diego (talk) 11:40, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

New article created: Neville Page
I've created the new article, Neville Page. Feel free to improve or discuss at Talk:Neville Page. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 04:27, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Neville Page

Hannibal the Cannibal
We seem to be missing a franchise article, Hannibal Lecter is a fictional character article, so does not serve as a good franchise article. A franchise article should be created for this media franchise. Hannibal the Cannibal franchise or Hannibal Lecter franchise would serve as titles. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 10:54, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Review on The Evil Dead
The GA reviewer is requesting a copyedit to clean up the prose, can someone take a look at the article? Thanks. igordebraga ≠ 21:59, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Under the Dome (TV series)
Under the Dome (TV series) has been rated as "MID" importance to your project, is this correct? It seems odd to me -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 04:30, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I've changed it to low. Not enough of significance on the genre. Not yet anyways. Andrzejbanas (talk) 10:30, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

""
The usage of and fighting-machine is under discussion, see talk:Tripod (The War of the Worlds). "fighting machine" is currently used for a real world military topic. "Tripod" is a horror topic. -- 65.94.78.70 (talk) 07:08, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

""
The usage of and flying machine is under discussion, see talk:flying-machine. "flying machine" is currently used for a real world aeronautical topic. "Flying-machine" is a horror topic. -- 65.94.78.70 (talk) 07:15, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

""
The usage of and handling machine is under discussion, see talk:handling-machine. "handling-machine" is currently a science fiction topic. -- 65.94.78.70 (talk) 07:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Suggest Edit for an Article
Hi, I am new here and would like to suggest an edit for the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigappu_Rojakkal

Under the Remakes section it was stated that "Sigappu Rojakkal was remade in Japanese as Red Roses (1979)" - There are no results from Google search regarding a Japanese movie titled Red Rose in reference to Sigappu Rojakkal - are there any references to this?

However I have found a Japanese movie from 1979 titled "Beautiful Girl Hunter" which seems to have a similar plot to Sigappu Rojakkal and could be the Japanese movie in question.

V5point0 (talk) 14:40, 4 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi and welcome V5point0! :) I'm not familiar with this film, and unfortunately I had to remove your Youtube link, as we can't really link here to unauthorized copyrighted material. Sorry about that. There doesn't seem to be a source given for the Japanese title. Hmmm. It could be the Japanese film...you could see if the Wikiproject Japan knows/can find something about it, since this is a Japanese film we're talking about. :) Rapunzel-bellflower (talk) 16:48, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Popular pages tool update
As of January, the popular pages tool has moved from the Toolserver to Wikimedia Tool Labs. The code has changed significantly from the Toolserver version, but users should notice few differences. Please take a moment to look over your project's list for any anomalies, such as pages that you expect to see that are missing or pages that seem to have more views than expected. Note that unlike other tools, this tool aggregates all views from redirects, which means it will typically have higher numbers. (For January 2014 specifically, 35 hours of data is missing from the WMF data, which was approximated from other dates. For most articles, this should yield a more accurate number. However, a few articles, like ones featured on the Main Page, may be off).

Web tools, to replace the ones at ~alexz/pop, will become available over the next few weeks at popularpages. All of the historical data (back to July 2009 for some projects) has been copied over. The tool to view historical data is currently partially available (assessment data and a few projects may not be available at the moment). The tool to add new projects to the bot's list is also available now (editing the configuration of current projects coming soon). Unlike the previous tool, all changes will be effective immediately. OAuth is used to authenticate users, allowing only regular users to make changes to prevent abuse. A visible history of configuration additions and changes is coming soon. Once tools become fully available, their toolserver versions will redirect to Labs.

If you have any questions, want to report any bugs, or there are any features you would like to see that aren't currently available on the Toolserver tools, see the updated FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Mr.Z-bot (talk) (for Mr.Z-man ) 05:10, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

The Texas Chain Saw Massacre 40th Anniversary FAC
Hey everyone, long time no see. I was hoping to get The Texas Chain Saw Massacre up to FA-class this year in time for its 40th anniversary, and would appreciate any help if anybody wants to. Thanks, --<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (Discuss) 14:02, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I'd be happy to help, but I'm not sure what more can be contributed. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:07, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree with Andrejbanas. The article seems to cover everything. Rapunzel-bellflower (talk) 18:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, I'll get it to FAC sometime in June/July, and hopefully, any outstanding issues will be sorted out by October.--<b style="color:#0000f1">TÆRkast</b> (Discuss) 22:23, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Phantasm V
With the new film completed and officially announced, I too the time to make a page for Phantasm V: Ravager. I felt that one thing necessary was a more detailed history of the various stops and starts on production. If you have more info, feel free to add to it. Udar55 (talk) 20:54, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

The Town That Dreaded Sundown
In attempts to get the project rejuvinated again slightly, I'll try to keep users updated here on articles that are possible Good Article, Featured List and Featured article status. Currently, The Town That Dreaded Sundown is on hold. I think the article could still be cleaned up a bit. If any members would like to give it a read over, that would be very helpful. :) The GA status can be found here. Andrzejbanas (talk) 11:50, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikiproject banner issues
I noticed the wikiproject banner for WP:HORROR seems to take more space than necessary. Especially when it comes to the B-criteria list. it adds a second slot for the criteria right under the top one. so whether its start, C, or B, that B criteria block is there. If you look at talk:Uzumaki, WP:ANIME seems to condense the B-list criteria much more efficiently. Perhaps this wikiproject and mirror the WP:ANIME's wikproject banner? Another issue i find is the horror image is pretty big. is there anyway to make that smaller? not by much, but just enough to shrink it. Lucia Black (talk) 04:00, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 * It could be shrunk and I'm not against the idea of changing the icon or using a smaller one. I'm not really sure on the standards it takes to do this though. Anyone in the know or anyone who knows someone in the know? Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:02, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Leaflet For Wikiproject Horror At Wikimania 2014
Are you looking to recruit more contributors to your project? We are offering to design and print physical paper leaflets to be distributed at Wikimania 2014 for all projects that apply. For more information, click the link below. Project leaflets Adikhajuria (talk) 12:31, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Ada Wong's GAR
Ada Wong, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.

I would like to note that I did not nominate this article but am notifying the proper projects and editors on it. GamerPro64 20:41, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Andrea Harrison
Opinions are needed on the above linked matter. A WP:Permalink for it is here. Flyer22 (talk) 17:38, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Uzumaki
The Japanese Horror manga Uzumaki was nominated for a GA Review, and is currently looking for a second reviewer for fresh eyes. Most of the leg work is done here! Anyone interested? Maybe ? Andrzejbanas (talk) 00:19, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I helped out the nominator with it before she put it up at GAN, so I can't. :( Sorry about that. Rapunzel-bellflower (talk) 21:31, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Curses! No problem. I'm sure it'll get a good re-review eventually. Thanks though! Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:59, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal
Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

WP:VG comments subpages cleanup
Hi, there is currently a discussion taking place at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games regarding whether it would be acceptable to permanently shift all comments subpages associated with WP:VG articles into talk. This shift would follow the recommended approach given at WP:DCS. The WikiProject Horror articles that would be affected by this action are these: If you have objections related specifically to WikiProject Horror's use of these subpages, please make this clear at the discussion so that other unrelated talk pages can be cleaned up where appropriate. Thank you. -Thibbs (talk) 15:54, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Resident Evil Zero
 * Saw (video game)

Expert attention
This is a notice about Category:Horror articles needing expert attention, which might be of interest to your WikiProject. It will take a while before the category is populated. Iceblock (talk) 05:07, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

The Town That Dreaded Sundown
There is conversation whether the content on the film The Town That Dreaded Sundown requires sources or not for the The_Town_That_Dreaded_Sundown section. If anyone can contribute, it would be useful. Andrzejbanas (talk) 04:00, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikiproject Horror Userbox
I was wondering if I could submit a userbox for Wikiproject Horror participants. I have some here. I'm designing one now if you'd like to see it here. I won't post it anywhere other than in my sandbox until then. Please let me know on my talk page.

Thanks!

Tɛɛɳɑ (talk) 01:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject X is live!


Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Creator template RFC
Be advised that there is an WP:RFC at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Actors_and_Filmmakers with the intent of creating a general rule to support deleting templates at Category:Film producer navigational boxes, Category:Film writer navigational boxes, Category:Television producer templates, Category:Television creator templates, and Category:Television writer templates.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:18, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

WP:HORROR Icon
Hello crew! I will start trying to re-vamp this group slightly in the summer. One item I was thinking of doing was replacing our current icon of ol' Dracula with something a little snappier. I've found these images on the commons:

Thoughts? Andrzejbanas (talk) 23:15, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Definitely a good idea. Personally, I really like both, but.. I guess I'll go with spooky house. Rapunzel-bellflower (talk) 00:48, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The icon needs to look good when it's small, so I'd rather go with spooky castle. ... Or not changing it, or some other option. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 08:49, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your replies guys! I like both, but I agree with, that the castle stands out more when shrunk down. I've been playing around with a new front page for WP:HORROR which can be viewed here. Thoughts so far? Andrzejbanas (talk) 10:07, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Tenebrae FAR
I have nominated Tenebrae (film) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 02:15, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

BioShock listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for BioShock to be moved to BioShock (video game). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:34, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Horror Re-Design
Hello everyone. As mentioned above, I've been attempting a re-design of the main page of WP:HORROR. This will make our group a little easier to navigate I think.

You can view a sample of the new design here.

I'd like to get it running within a week's time. Does anyone have any questions or comments? Andrzejbanas (talk) 01:31, 29 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Looks nice. Great work! :) Rapunzel-bellflower (talk) 01:49, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

So this is not directly related to your draft but I noticed our "to-do list" has this point: "Hold elections for Coordinator, Deputy Coordinator and Assistant coordinators." No. Let's not. Let's remove that line, and let's do away with the current "coordinator" and "editor-in-chief" positions. WikiProjects don't have hierarchies. I didn't join this project to support someone's power-trip. Members are all equal. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 09:15, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I actually removed it from our list. ;) I don't think anyone was taking these roles seriously and anyone can be here to supervise and try and organize new tasks, etc. Andrzejbanas (talk) 10:32, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * WikiProject Horror/to do. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 10:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah yes. Whups. Removed! Andrzejbanas (talk) 11:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC)


 * So I'm gonna be a major buzzkill now but I think the redesign needs a redesign. See this: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Council. Basically, the design uses tables (like a lot of Wikiproject pages currently do), but it's a bad idea. Tables are meant to be used for displaying tabular data, not for designing pages. Using tables for whole page design can cause different kinds of problems. I'm not making this up, html table layouts are a widely discussed issue on the rest of the internet. I don't have a solid solution right now but I'm working on it myself since I'm planning a redesign of WikiProject Paranormal. But I decided to work on the content first and design the layout later. I'm probably going to use floating divs though, where necessary. (My userpage for example doesn't contain any big tables, the right sidebar is inside a float:right div.) — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 13:52, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * No that's totally true and understandable. That's why I posted it here first before I went out and just posted it. My only concern would be as this is a project page and not a wiki article, are we as concerned with mobile compatibility? I'd imagine we are still, but if not, I can try to clean up portions of this page on my own. Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:20, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * You might want to ask that on that WikiProject Council thread. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 15:26, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

AfD of Leatherface film
Leatherface (film) has been nominated for deletion on the grounds that it fails the notability criteria, contains unreliable sources, and it is not clear if the name of the article will actually be the name of  the  film. See discussion at Articles for deletion/Leatherface (film).  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  17:49, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Adam Wingard
I'm interested in expanding on articles for the films of horror director Adam Wingard. I was hoping I could solicit help from the horror group. Depending on how fast that goes, I'd also like to fix up horror anthology articles (Trick R Treat, VHS, Tales of Halloween) to better match the well made Grindhouse page the group has done such a good job on. Let me know if there's a good place or method for carrying on the discussion! Civicoblivion (talk) 15:58, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

WP:Prose vs. table format for cast lists
Opinions are needed on the following matter: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Television. A WP:Permalink for it is here. Flyer22 (talk) 05:53, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Discussion over at Wikiproject:Film regarding production section.
I'm inviting anyone who's interested to join in a discussion regarding Production section clutter over at Wikiproject: Film the discussion can be found here --Deathawk (talk) 06:01, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

"The X-Files (season 10)"
The usage and topic of is under discussion, see talk:The X-Files (miniseries) -- 70.51.200.135 (talk) 05:43, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

"The X-Files Season 10"
The X-Files Season 10 has been proposed to be renamed, see talk:The X-Files Season 10 -- 70.51.200.135 (talk) 05:27, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed change of WikiProject Horror's banner image/icon
A requested edit of the protected WikiProject Horror banner template, proposes a change of the image/icon used in the banner.
 * This proposal should be discussed by the affected community at Template talk:WikiProject Horror.

Thank you. <b style='font:1rem Arial;color:#066;text-decoration:inherit;'>f<i style='font-size:.7em;color:#0bb;'>red</i>g<i style='font-size:.7em;color:#0bb;'>andt</i></b> 23:48, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

RfC notice: In-universe name details of fictional characters, in article leads
Please see Village pump (policy) (concerning fictional characters as article subjects generally). — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  01:24, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Horror icon
So to update the project, I'm proposing we update our icon. I know on the main page it's still Dracula while we've had the haunted house. But no set conclusion. I've found some of these icons, which some could be possible good ones for the project. They are clean and simple and may be better than the haunted house.

I would suggest some of the following:

I think personally the jason mask one gives more of a pop culture identity to the group that the Dracula one did, but still looks more like an icon rather than a odd image. Thoughts? Let's vote and get something sorted out. Andrzejbanas (talk) 02:05, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Horror House (2013 film) - delete or promote? It's on borrowed time
Hello horror fans. This draft will be deleted shortly unless someone takes an interest in it or thinks that the current references demonstrate notability. Any opinions?&mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 16:21, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I redirected it to Lloyd Kaufman until its notability can be determined.&mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 20:39, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Doctor Sleep intro
Hi horror fans, I want to edit the introduction to the Wikipedia entry on the Stephen King novel Doctor Sleep. About half of the intro is about dates leading up to the publication of the book, not the book itself. To me, it seems to bog down the intro. If anyone would like to chime in, I started a discussion on the article's talk page. Maybe I'm off base. I'm new to editing articles on novels so I felt it best to discuss before I make any edits. Vivatheviva (talk) 18:11, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Weird Tales (anthology series) -> Weird Tales merger
I've proposed a merger of Weird Tales (anthology series) -> Weird Tales at the target talk page; please comment there if interested. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 01:54, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

AfD question
Would like input from project members as to reliability of sources and notability of this individual: Articles for deletion/Sean Whalen. Thank you. Montanabw (talk) 03:48, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

CfD
The category Fantasy horror films is up for deletion. You can voice your opinion on this at Categories for discussion/Log/2016 September 28. Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:09, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Christy Jenkins and Horror
There is a discussion on Talk:Christy Jenkins about where the article belong as part of WP:HORROR. If you are familiar with the series Charmed she is from, please add to the discussion to see if you think the page belong as part of the project page. Andrzejbanas (talk) 00:57, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Notice to participants at this page about adminship
Many participants here create a lot of content, may have to evaluate whether or not a subject is notable, decide if content complies with BLP policy, and much more. Well, these are just some of the skills considered at Requests for adminship.

So, please consider taking a look at and watchlisting this page:


 * Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll

You could be very helpful in evaluating potential candidates, and even finding out if you would be a suitable RfA candidate.

Many thanks and best wishes,

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 17:46, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

2016 Community Wishlist Survey Proposal to Revive Popular Pages
Greetings Members!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about a technical proposal to revive your Popular Pages list in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:


 * Fix and improve Mr.Z-bot's popular pages report

If the above proposal gets in the Top 10 based on the votes, there is a high likelihood of this bot being restored so your project will again see monthly updates of popular pages.

Further, there are over 260 proposals in all to review and vote for, across many aspects of wikis.

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Best regards, — Delivered: 18:01, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Talk:List of A Nightmare on Elm Street media
Besides the title of the page, the page itself is also subject to recent RM discussion. Join in. --George Ho (talk) 01:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Looking for reviewers for GA: The Seventh Victim
Hello all, I've done considerable work on the article for The Seventh Victim, the 1943 horror film directed by Mark Robson, and am looking to get reviewers in order to help it pass a GA review. If anyone is interested, I would much appreciate it! –Drown Soda (talk) 22:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * , hello! I'll take a little glance at it. I've already noted that the poster appears to be a lobby card, so that's one thing to look into on the talk page. I'll try to take a look at it tonight at home. Great work though! Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Reviewers needed for Archie vs. Predator FAC
Additional opinions are needed at Featured article candidates/Archie vs. Predator/archive1. All input is welcome. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:40, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Reviewers wanted for GAN: Final Destination 3
Greetings, I've been working on the FD3 article for some time now and believe it is ready to be reviewed for a GA nomination. If you're interested in reviewing the movie, I would appreciate your help. PanagiotisZois (talk) 10:34, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello ! I do not think I have time to review the article, but a quick browse shows that there are a lot of sources showing IMDb, some blogs, and sites that take in user-submitted content like Last.fm for sources and these usually fail as reliable sources in GA reviews. You might want to get these cleaned up before someone decides to peak at your review. Otherwise, good job! Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:50, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft
For those who are unaware, I started draft for Tom Six' upcoming psychological horror film The Onania Club. For those who aren't aware, he created The Human Centipede. I haven't had the time to edit it, but feel free to contribute here.  Dark Knight  2149  03:48, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I plan on creating the draft for the upcoming Halloween film, probably today.  Dark Knight  2149  14:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Good idea! I added a quick little bit, but I'll keep an eye on the article. :) Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

The Halloween draft was created and is here. I will be expanding it soon.  Dark Knight  2149  22:21, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Utah SF/F writers and works competition
Hi WikiProject Horror, I'm hosting a Wikipedia writing contest for new and improved pages for Utah SF/F writers and their works. You're welcome to join us and participate via the linked contest page. I know there's a lot of crossover between horror and SF/F. Let me know if you have any questions. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 15:38, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

RfC on the WP:ANDOR guideline
Hi, all. Opinions are needed on the following: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. A WP:Permalink for it is here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:04, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Automatic URL archives
Glad tidings! A new day has dawned in which you can add archiveurls to all references in your articles at the push of a button (here's an example). Calling this out for anyone who hasn't tried it- it's smooth like butter. You hit the login button, hit accept, then just run bot->fix a single page, enter the name and tick the boxes, and literally five seconds later all the refs on the page are archived. It transforms an hour-long, laborious process into a nearly-instantaneous process. Find this "iabot" tool here. Blue sphere  04:11, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Popular pages report
We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, will post at /Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of. We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:
 * The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
 * The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
 * The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).

We're grateful to for his original, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.

Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

list of zombie episodes
How feasible is this? Non-horror shows often have 1 zombie themed episode. I would like to keep track if them on a list. ScratchMarshall (talk) 20:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Seems that someone has beat you to it with Category:Zombies in television. Though, I imagine that it could be updated and expand the list.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  20:38, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Source review for Final Destination 3
Hello fellow users, would anyone be inerested in performing a source review for Final Destination 3 and getting one more horror article promoted to featured status? PanagiotisZois (talk) 16:16, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Randall Flagg
My hope is to get this to Featured status. I think the article is 99% of the way there but there's usually something preventing it from being accepted whenever I nominate it. Would anyone with experience be willing to help go over this article with me? Suggestions are also appreciated. --CyberGhostface (talk) 18:19, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed merger (Begotten and Din of Celestial Birds)
There is a discussion at Talk:Din of Celestial Birds to merge the short film article with its feature length predecessor, Begotten (film).  Dark Knight  2149  20:01, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Morales (The Walking Dead) picture
Hi, wondering can anyone get a season 8 image of Morales (The Walking Dead) for the article's infobox please? Cheers, Theo (edits) 09:13, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

RFC to change Film: MOS
I opened up an RFC on proposed changes to the Film:MOS. You can vote on it here/ Thank you --Deathawk (talk) 21:13, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation links on pages tagged by this wikiproject
Wikipedia has many thousands of wikilinks which point to disambiguation pages. It would be useful to readers if these links directed them to the specific pages of interest, rather than making them search through a list. Members of WikiProject Disambiguation have been working on this and the total number is now below 20,000 for the first time. Some of these links require specialist knowledge of the topics concerned and therefore it would be great if you could help in your area of expertise.

A list of the relevant links on pages which fall within the remit of this wikiproject can be found at http://69.142.160.183/~dispenser/cgi-bin/topic_points.py?banner=WikiProject_Horror

Please take a few minutes to help make these more useful to our readers.&mdash; Rod talk 15:57, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject
The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

Portals are being redesigned.

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template Transclude lead excerpt.

The discussion about this can be found here.

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.

Background
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.

There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

So far, 84 editors have joined.

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.

Thank you. &mdash; The Transhumanist  10:58, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Ugetsu community GAR notification
Ugetsu, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 05:53, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Fright Night
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Fright Night. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:37, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Highest grossing horror films
I just made the list List of highest-grossing horror films. Feel free to add to it. I will be expanding it a lot soon with info about franchises and such.★Trekker (talk) 13:56, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

sources for horror reviews?
I'm working on a page for a successful independent horror author. His works get lots of reviews, but I'm not finding very many reviews in newspapers. You can see his list of reviews. Sites like "The Horror Fiction Review" and "Horror Novel Reviews" seem on the border of reliable sources to me, but are they commonly accepted in the horror community? Thanks Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 17:31, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I will offer my thoughts, as this page isn't really patrolled, but I do not edit articles about horror writing (rather, I edit horror video game articles). Neither of the sites you mentioned look like reliable sources to me. Horror Fiction Review openly states their bias: "This is a FANZINE. If you want more critical reviews, a FANzine might not be the best place to look." Now bias does not make a source inherently unreliable, but they also have no editorial policy listed, and no information on who the authors are and their credentials. Horror Novel Reviews at least has author bios, but nothing there gives any credence to their reliability. They just appear to be fans, not professional horror or book critics. I'm not familiar with sources in the book review world, but in the video game world, sources like this would be considered unreliable. TarkusAB talk 18:06, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * thank you, it's helpful to know that I'm not alone in questioning them as good sources! I was able to find a few news articles and award nominations, so hopefully that will be enough. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 19:18, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

A new newsletter directory is out!
A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
 * – Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Five Nights at Freddy's for good article reassessment
Five Nights at Freddy's, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. <small style="color:red">JOE BRO  64  22:29, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

FAC copyedit request
Hello. It was suggested at the FAC for Soultaker (film) to have a copyedit done for it to make it better. Would anything here be interested in doing a copyedit for the article? GamerPro64 15:27, 29 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Well, I'm an anyone, but I wouldn't mind taking a look at it over the weekend. Are there any particular areas of concern? Rapunzel-bellflower (talk) 23:35, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I can wait for the weekend. The plot and the production sections was pointed out for a copyedit. Could also check the Reception section as well. GamerPro64  04:05, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Necronomicon Providence
Are any editors going to Necronomicon in Providence RI this coming weekend, August 22-25 2019? Is there interest in a get-together or BoF?

I've noticed a few of the guests don't have photos (Peter Cannon, Sonya Taaffe, Paul Tremblay), so I may try to get photos of them. Two of the guests don't have wikipedia pages at all (Molly Tanzer and Dempow Torishima) but that's a more time-consuming project. Andrew Kuchling (talk) 20:36, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I can't go myself. But I'd be willing to help with articles whatever way I can.★Trekker (talk) 16:11, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

How is article importance determined?
I was wondering how new articles (or any articles, for that matter) are evaluated in terms of importance. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 18:59, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Importance is determined by how much focus you think the article deserves. For example a great well written article on a major subject might not be deemed "top priority" because it doesn't need much focus right now, because it's already good, while a stub on a smaller subject migh be in need urgent checks by many editors to fix it.★Trekker (talk) 19:16, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Now recruiting
I'm looking for participants for a possible new wikiproject H. P. Lovecraft, to tag and improve articles relating to the horror writer.-- Auric   talk  09:47, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * It's been suggested that this be a taskforce instead. Does anyone feel like helping?-- Auric   talk  09:55, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I think it being a taskforce would be better.★Trekker (talk) 11:01, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * A taskforce also requires participants. Whether it's a project or a taskforce, this idea still has zero participants apart from its creator. --  Brown HairedGirl  (talk) • (contribs) 10:50, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm well aware a taskforce needs members as well.★Trekker (talk) 15:28, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Ping me if there are any articles that need improvement. --mikeu talk 16:46, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Caligari FAC needs attention
Hello all. I've nominated The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari for FA. So far the comments have been positive and leaning toward support, but it's at risk of getting archived because there haven't been enough editors weighing in on the conversation. If possible, please check out the FAC page and offer some feedback. Thanks! — <b style="color:#C0C0C0">Hun</b><b style="color:#C0C0C0">ter</b> <b style="color:#595454">Ka</b><b style="color:#595454">hn</b> 18:31, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Begotten GA Nomination
I have been working on an off again on expanding the article for the 1989 film Begotten for about 4 years now. I thought it would be nice, and ironic, to have it all approved for GA status before the year ends considering that it took 4 years to make the film. That and I want to get started on moving it to FA status soon as well. Feel free to let me know if you are willing to do so.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:37, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Requested move of Braindead (film)
A requested moved is being discussed at Talk:Braindead (film) which may be of interest to participants of this WikiProject. -- Netoholic @ 20:45, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Alice, Sweet Alice
I just completed some technical cleanup of this article. It was marked as a Start-class, I believe it to be B-class and marked it so. As this project had a banner on it I thought you might want to be aware. —¿philoserf? (talk) 04:41, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

100 Horror films GAs
Just want to say to everyone who works on these films on making 100 GA film articles for WikiProject horror. I know the point of this groups is to collaborate on projects and we haven't always done it fully, but I'm glad we were able to reach this bit. Let's keep going. :) Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:04, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I'd like to give a shout out to who has done amazing work on many horror articles.★Trekker (talk) 11:33, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Wow, thanks for that ! Here is getting about that many FA Horror articles!--Paleface Jack (talk) 19:10, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Agreed! Great work for sure. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:34, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Bringing Historically Significant and Influential Horror Topics to FA Status
Hello Horror Family! It has been on my mind for some time that many articles on subjects that are influential/significant to the Horror genre have not been given the love/attention they deserve, which is a shame considering how much the genre has been shaped by them. From articles such as those on influential novels (Dracula, Frankenstein, The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, etc.), films (Nosferatu, Universal Horror films, Halloween, The Texas Chain Saw Massacre, and so many others), characters, and other subjects have either been relegated to low-level status or stuck at GA. In my personal opinion, it would be hugely beneficial to bring such articles up to Featured Status as they are HUGELY significant subjects that have progressed the Horror genre and, as such are TOP importance. I am currently working on bringing several articles up to FA status at the moment but I would be willing to help collaborate with others in bringing several of these articles to FA status. Just wanted to put this idea out there before I forgot about it again, let me know if any of you are interested in this.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:28, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I agree fully. I personally think that there is a lot to be done regarding the Universal Classics that is long overdue.★Trekker (talk) 17:11, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 * That does seem like a fun idea to take in. Ill look through the listings after my current FAC is done. GamerPro64  19:09, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I have a really strong book about the making of Dracula that I could contribute with. I've been slowly working through some of the more obscure early Universal titles that were listed in Tom Weaver "Universal Horror" book and have submitted Cat People for a GA review that should be finished soon. Andrzejbanas (talk) 00:49, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Horror film article
I am tempted to re-write one the article "Horror film from scratch as its currently a mix of dead sources, YouTube links, original research, and over-emphasis on some less important topics. Would anyone in the group be interested in tackling some sort of group project? Although its a large encompassing project, I think tightening it up would make one the most important articles in the project be far more respectable. Would anyone be interesting in joining in? Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:46, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I'd be open to that.★Trekker (talk) 18:12, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Great! One more would be better than just myself. I've been a bit busy since I posted this, but we could create some group talk page to try and tackle it up and discuss it. Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:07, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Squirm nominated at FAC
I have nominated the article for Squirm for Featured Article Candidacy. If anyone is interested in reviewing the article, that would be much appreciated. The nomination can be found here. GamerPro64 20:39, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * This nomination is still up for review and needs more comments to it so if anyone wants to review it that would be much appreciated. GamerPro64  16:55, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Can I get someone to copyedit the article? I think its on the verge of becoming a Featured Article but it needs a copyedit to get by. GamerPro64  04:47, 17 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Renominated Squirm here. GamerPro64  15:54, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Squirm congrats
Just wanted to post to say great work for to for getting Squirm up to featured article status. That was quite the uphill battle but you got it done. Excellent work! Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:38, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I checked it out, great work!★Trekker (talk) 17:44, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Crazy to get this to Featured Article then having Soultaker be on the front page two days later. Really hoping to get more articles to get a bronze star. GamerPro64  17:53, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

New film article - Bloodlust Zombies
I created a new film article, about Bloodlust Zombies. Let me know if you want to help out with further research! Thanks very much, Right cite (talk) 02:49, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Hey Hey. I posted some comments on your talk page. I think you received them already though. :) Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:00, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Reliable sources list
I think it would be good to put together a list of sources typically seen as reliable as far as the horror genre goes, as there are a lot of niche horror sites that may be challenged if an article goes up for AfD or some other form of deletion - or just in general.

Here is my list so far:

I know I'm forgetting some, but I wanted to get a quick list started. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:18, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Dread Central: mainstream horror site
 * Bloody Disgusting: same
 * Rue Morgue: not as mainstream but still generally well known and respected
 * Fangoria: mainstream horror magazine, seen as a bit PR-ish, but generally seen as a reliable source
 * Arrow in the Head/JoBlo: Has editorial oversight, typically seen as a RS
 * Ginger Nuts of Horror: Has editorial oversight (AFAIK), was mentioned in this academic press book, frequently nominated for Locus Awards
 * HorrorNews.net: has editorial oversight, used as source in academic and scholarly texts/articles, typically seen as a RS
 * Daily Dead: Editorial oversight (AFAIK), typically seen as reliable
 * Kim Newman: well known for his critical pieces (also an author in general)
 * Tom Holland's Terror Time: I typically see more PR from there, but there does seem to be editorial oversight.
 * Culture Crypt: Run by a single person AFAIK, but his work has been referred to by big time outlets such as Bloody Disgusting, albeit briefly. Has held interviews with notable persons such as Darren Lynn Bousman
 * Horror Society: Has editorial oversight, typically seen as reliable but may need some closer review
 * iHorror (per comments)
 * Pop Horror (per comments)
 * Den of Geek: Typically seen as reliable AFAIK
 * The Geekiary (per my comment below)
 * I agree very much with this list. I'd also like to add iHorror (has editors and has been covered in reliable sources itself) and PopHorror (has staff and editors).★Trekker (talk) 08:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Adding to the list! ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:33, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Here's a potential addition:
 * Cryptic Rock: Used as a source in this Bloomsbury book, this book from a Rowan & Littlefield imprint. It's used in this book from Wipf and Stock, a biblical publisher but one whose works I believe are typically used scholastically.
 * Gruesome Magazine: Has an editorial staff, but that seems to be about it for the most part.
 * What do you guys think? ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:25, 3 October 2020 (UTC)


 * I also added Gruesome Magazine for consideration. It has an editorial staff, but I can't see where it's routinely used as a reliable source. I'm leaning towards ambivalent on this one. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:29, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Added Den of Geek. I think it's typically seen as reliable? ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:11, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Agree with the list so far, suggest that the list should be either linked or incorporated at the Wiki Project Film resources page, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 21:01, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I have linked the two pages to each other.★Trekker (talk) 13:36, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * that's great, Atlantic306 (talk) 18:37, 5 October 2020 (UTC)


 * I'm going to add The Geekiary - I'm looking for reviews on a film and this site popped up. A look shows that while it's a smaller site, it has been used as a citation/source for these academic and scholarly books. It's also interviewed with some fairly major stars - the last book I linked to had used their interview with Orlando Bloom as a source. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:02, 20 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi again all, since no one has objected I'll go ahead and add the above sources to the list.★Trekker (talk) 15:24, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Here are my source suggestions: --Paleface Jack (talk) 18:08, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * CHUD.com- Film review and movie news website and the longest-running site of its kind.
 * IconsofFright.com- Editorial with interviews with actors/actresses and filmmakers in the horror industry.
 * TerrorTrap- Another editorial with reviews and interviews
 * Birth.Movies.Death- Cultural magazine and editorial with news and commentary on films and media.
 * Nightmarish Conjurings- Horror editorial.
 * I'm familiar with Chud, IconsofFright and BMD and support those, I don't have any experience with the other two so can't speak yet on them, will check them out.★Trekker (talk) 19:32, 3 November 2020 (UTC)


 * I'm also familiar with CHUD and BMD. Nightmarish Conjurings looks OK - I was a little nervous that the about page had no info, but they're listed as a trusted critic on RT (both site and founder) and the founder Shannon McGrew is also interviewed here by TIME, which is reassuring. It was also cited as a source in a book published by ABC-CLIO, which typically has some strong editorial oversight. I'll look into the other two. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:37, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Source page
I decided to boldy create this new page to cover our listing of reliable sources. I hope more people chime in so we can have a wide consensus on potential sources.★Trekker (talk) 13:37, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks ! ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  23:09, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Seems alright for me, but granted I'm only familiar with a few of them here. I'll see if I can give it a better overview. Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:13, 4 October 2020 (UTC)


 * I'm on board, sounds like a good idea. (SeanTheYeti452)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Universal Classic Monsters
Template:Universal Classic Monsters has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. I've given a lot of thoughts about this one, but please read my response to why I don't think it should be used before responding. Thank you all in advance! Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:48, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Universal Classic Monsters split
I have proposed splitting the Universal Classic Monsters into separate articles. Please voice your opinion after reading the talk page at Universal Classic Monsters. Thank you! Andrzejbanas (talk) 02:10, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Help with Plot in The Giant Spider Invasion
I can admit that I am not good with writing plots for articles so I am hoping that I can get some assistance in filling in the plot section for The Giant Spider Invasion. It would be very helpful. GamerPro64 05:36, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Love Horror as a source?
I'm in the process of trying to create articles for films released during the 2020 FrightFest in London (side note, if anyone wants to pick up one, I've got a list with sources in my sandbox). I've frequently come across the website Love Horror and I can't remember if this was seen as usable or not. The about page gives off the impression that it should be usable and they do have editorial staff]. There's positive feedback, but it's from the people whose stuff they've reviewed. They do have praise from the Tromalicious Lloyd Kaufman, so they have that in their corner as far as I'm concerned. There's not much popping up from it being used in books and the like, except this McFarland text. That may be more due to the website having a name that bring up a lot of false positives, though.

What's your opinion? I say it's usable offhand. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:29, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If the article from Love Horror is written by a reputable reporter (such as John Squires), the FA precedent is that it's considered usable. If not, then I'm not so sure.  Dark knight  2149  04:56, 14 March 2021 (UTC) Actually, it looks like I was confusing it with Horror Love. Yeah, I have never heard of this site lol. Sorry about that.  Dark  knight  2149  04:58, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Zombie Nightmare Peer Review
I made a Peer Review for Zombie Nightmare. If you can, please do submit your feedback here. Thanks. GamerPro64 03:30, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Film article suggestions
Hey, I put together a list of films needing articles. I'm feeling a bit too lazy to do them all myself, so decided to post here in case someone(s) was interested. They all have sourcing and just need to be written up. Lately I've been feeling more like just scouting for sourcing than writing, TBH. The list can be found here. The general way I do sourcing is that I have the reviews in one section and articles about the film (interviews, release dates, etc) in another. The stuff you'd typically see in the external links section are at the top. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:46, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * It always seems weird to me to see how other wiki editors sort their notes. This system actually makes sense because you have a working list with citations and anyone can pick a topic and start an article. I have seen so many wiki workshop preparations and everyone does this differently. Cool system.  Blue Rasberry   (talk)  14:55, 24 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks! I used to just throw all of the sources together as I'd create the article right then and there. I changed it after going back to it and realizing that I had to sort them through all over again to determine what was what, as well as the where it was published. Sorting it like this ahead of time just cuts down on that a little, plus helps when I'm trying to determine if something is notable enough for an article while I'm still looking for sourcing. Plus I can just use abbreviations to refer to publications, like dc for Dread Central and so on. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  15:44, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

FAR for Pit and the Pendulum
I have nominated The Pit and the Pendulum (1961 film) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. 👨x🐱 (talk) 20:40, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Category:Horror articles needing expert attention has been nominated for discussion
Category:Horror articles needing expert attention has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 20:35, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Psycho-biddy
Hi! This article was brought up to AfD by and a good discussion has been started. I don't want to split the discussion, but I did want to draw new people in. The general gist is this:

There have been concerns that the coverage for the genre has been too recent and that it would be best merged into another article. A few suggestions were tossed around, such as merging content into gender in horror films (as the subgenre deals with older women) and even creating an article on the portrayal of elderly women in horror - or of elderly persons in horror in general.

I think that creating any new article among those lines would potentially be a larger undertaking, so I thought it'd be good to enlist people. Any input on this? ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  16:59, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Here's what I found as far as elderly and horror goes. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  17:24, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

External links on H. P. Lovecraft article
I would like to ask whether it would be appropriate to add to Lovecraft's article's external links section this list of links to online audiobooks of Lovecraft's works. It includes most of the stories he wrote alone and some of his poetry, nonfiction writings, and collaborative stories, and it is much more complete than his Librivox page, which is currently linked in the External Links. (I first asked about this on his article's talk page, but that seems not to have been noticed.) - 73.195.249.93 (talk) 03:28, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Removing a template
Hi. Relative newbie here. At Teahouse, they said I should come to the Wikipedia horror group and ask about removing a template at the article Rondo Hatton Classic Horror Awards, which I've been expanding because of a "notability" template there.

If we're all horror fans here then you know the Rondos are a fairly big deal. They've been around since 2002, presented annually at a fantasy/horror/sci-fi convention, and they get mentioned regularly in mostly the horror press but also big newspapers. I've put in a bunch of footnotes to cite all this — from websites, newspapers, magazines, scholarly journals and even a textbook.

A I said at the Teahouse, I don't want to just remove the template without it being OK to do so. The Rondos are notable. What does everyone think? The Horror, The Horror (talk) 14:06, 23 July 2021 (UTC)


 * You're right. There are plenty of references to establish notability. I removed the template while I was looking at the article. Rray (talk) 14:13, 23 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you! It feels very nice that maybe I'm developing good Wikipedia "instincts." Now that I've found this page, I look forward to working with everyone here! The Horror, The Horror (talk) 22:24, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Bloodthirsty
Hi. I'm going to try my first expansion of a movie article, at Bloodthirsty (2020 film). There's just a single section there and I'm going to follow the model of Werewolves Within to give sections for 1	Plot 2	Cast 3	Production 4	Release 5	Reception 5.1	Box office 5.2	Critical response

At least as best as I can. I'm going into it now, and I'll probably be a half-hour or 40 minutes or so. I'll post back here when I'm done and if I made any mistakes, and I probably will, maybe others here can give me contructive criticism and I will fix. Everyone on Wikipedia has been great to me. Thank you! The Horror, The Horror (talk) 19:41, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Go for it! Feel free to ask for feedback anytime.  Blue Rasberry   (talk)  19:45, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm sure you'll do great work! Rray (talk) 20:44, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you again everyone for being so supportive and encouraging. I probably made some mistakes but I think I found a lot of background on the movie. I thought I would have time today to fill in the plot and to fill out the reviews section using Rotten Tomatoes at https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/bloodthirsty but I hope tomorrow. I hope that's OK. The Horror, The Horror (talk) 21:15, 28 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Done. Thank you again everyone for any advice on my edits/mistakes at Bloodthirsty (2020 film). The Horror, The Horror (talk) 22:02, 29 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Nice work. Kudos. Rray (talk) 12:52, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Kim Newman
I just wanted to let WikiProject Horror know I've added biography citations to Kim Newman, and that at the Teahouse they say that the Internet Speculative Fiction Databsae is user-generated and that we shouldn't use it for footnotes. I know I don't have to report here with all my edits but I'm still learning and want to make sure I don't do anything wrong and if I do that I can fix it. Thank you, everyone. The Horror, The Horror (talk) 20:42, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Post Mortem: No One Dies in Skarnes
I've just expanded Post Mortem: No One Dies in Skarnes. It's the first time I've done a TV-show plot and I think it's OK to give spoilers (Spoiler) but if I'm wrong, please correct it! The Horror, The Horror (talk) 22:09, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
 * You are right, Wikipedia does not censor or avoid spoilers.★Trekker (talk) 22:25, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Michael Gingold
Hi! I've just really expanded the Wikipedia page for the writer about horror Michael Gingold. Please let me know what I can improve and please take a look! The Horror, The Horror (talk) 23:12, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I think you've done a good job! I appreciate your efforts on communicating with the group here on it, but you seem to be very much on the right track. :) Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)